Challenges Impeding Technology Education Teachers in Delivering Lessons to Raise Students’ Awareness About Littering

Background/purpose – Technology education (TE) offers hands-on activities through a design process to be an environmentally-oriented subject. TE can be used to reduce littering, an environmental problem that also has health implications for modern-day society. This research study sought to explore the challenges that impede TE teachers in delivering lessons to raise students’ awareness of littering through the application of the participatory paradigm.

Materials/methods – TE teachers of Grade 8 students were selected using purposive sampling in this qualitative participatory action research (PAR) study. The use of PAR was chosen in order to develop relevant action research-based methods of intervention that can be implemented to address gaps in the literature. Chaos theory was used to ground the study. Interviews were used to generate data from the study participants, which were then analyzed using the content/textual analysis method.

Results – The study identified issues, challenges, and obstacles that impede TE teachers from delivering lessons that raise students’ awareness about littering. Lack of understanding environmental education and subject relevancy were found to be some of the major challenges facing TE teachers in conscientizing students about littering.

Conclusion – The author concludes that TE teachers need to be equipped with environmental pedagogies through inservice training in order that they can incorporate littering issues into their lessons.

Keywords: chaos theory, environmental education, littering, problems, technology education

References

Akbar, H., Bibi, W., Inamullah, H. M., & Ullah, A. (2023). Analysis of Environmental Activism in high schools in District Peshawar. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 7(1) 1411-1419. https://journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/15572/10022.

Ankiewicz, P. (2021). Technology education in South Africa since the new dispensation in 1994: An analysis of curriculum documents and a meta-synthesis of scholarly work. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(5), 939-963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09589-8.

Bezuidenhout, R., & Cronje, F. (2018). Qualitative data analysis. In F. Plooy-Cilliers, C. Davis, & R. Bezuidenhout (Eds.), Research Matters (7th ed.) (pp. 228-251). Juta.

Cyprian, A. (2022). Environmental education awareness and implementation in secondary schools in Tanzania: A case of Sumbawanga Municipality [Doctoral dissertation, The Open University of Tanzania]. https://repository.out.ac.tz/3605/1/ALBERT%20CYPRIAN%20-%20dissertation%20Final.pdf.

Department of Basic Education. Republic of South Africa. (2011). Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement grades 7-9 (Schools) policy: Technology. Department of Education. https://www.education.gov.za/Portals/0/CD/National%20Curriculum%20Statements%20and%20Vocational/CAPS%20SP%20%20TECHNOLOGY%20GR%207-9.pdf?ver=2015-01-27-160218-077.

Fahim, M., & Talabari, F. A. (2014). Chaos/complexity theory and education. Two Quarterly Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning University of Tabriz, 6(13), 43-56. https://journals.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_2168_4cff07915201434e2c23086e117d2e28.pdf.

Fru, R. N., & Ndaba, T. L. (2023). Educators’ perceptions and approaches to environmental education and pro-environmental behaviour in South African Secondary Schools. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(5), 359-373. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.5.18.

Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a New Science. Viking Penguin.

Gumbo, M. T. (2014). An Action Research pilot study on the integration of indigenous technology in Technology Education. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(10), 386-392. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n10p386.

Ham, S., & Sewing, D. (1988). Barriers to Environmental Education. Journal of Environmental Education, 19(2), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1988.9942751.

Ho, U. T., Lepage, B. A., & Fang, W. (2022): Environmental education in preschool teacher training programs in Vietnam: situations and challenges. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education (Advance online publication). https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2022.2136552.

Jacobs, K. R. (2015). The classroom implementation of indigenous knowledge in the science curriculum by science teachers in the Western Cape province [Doctoral dissertation, University of Cape Town, South Africa]. https://open.uct.ac.za/items/f36d6667-0dcb-45b0-a2aa-a358b146dde8.

Little, R. L. (1998). Integrating environmental education across the curriculum in higher learning. In Proceedings of the International Best of Both Worlds Conference (pp. 102-111). The University of South Africa.

Malhotra, R. K., & Upadhyay, R. (2021). Teaching sustainability in technology education: A comparison of perception and practice. Ilkogretim Online, 20(1), 7328-7342. doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2021.01.757.

Mamabolo, J. (2021). Challenges faced by teachers in the implementation of curriculum changes for primary schools: The case of Mamabolo Circuit, South Africa. African Perspectives of Research in Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 15-23. http://hdl.handle.net/10386/3293.

Mambinja, S. (2008). School grounds as a place for environmental learning in the life skills learning programme [Master’s thesis, Rhodes University, South Africa]. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/145046039.pdf.

McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education – evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). International Edition. Pearson.

Meeran, S., & Amin, N. (2021). When curriculum changes: the resilience of a mathematics teacher. African Perspectives of Research in Teaching and Learning, 5(2), 1-15. https://www.ul.ac.za/aportal/application/downloads/Article%2011_5_2_nov_2021.pdf.

Moeletsi, P. M. A. (2022). Impediments faced by Technology teachers in the teaching of Technology [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Africa]. https://uir.unisa.ac.za/handle/10500/28943.

Nkambwe, M., & Essilfie, V. N. (2012). Misalignment between policy and practice: Introducing Environmental Education in school curricula in Botswana. Educational Research and Review, 7(1), 19-26. https://academicjournals.org/journal/ERR/article-full-text-pdf/1790CE64295.pdf.

Nunes, B. M., Martins, T., Zhou, J., Alajamy, L. M., & Al-Mamari, S. (2010). Contextual sensitivity in grounded theory: The role of pilot studies. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 8(2), 73-84. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/42825/.

Ogunniyi, M. B. (2005). Cultural perspectives on science and technology education. In A. A. Abdi & A. Cleghorn (Eds.), Issues in African Education: Sociological perspectives (1st ed.) (pp. 123-140). Palgrave MacMillan.

Pienaar, C., & Lombard, E. (2010). A teacher educator’s practice becoming a living theory. Education As Change, 14(2), 259-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2010.522064.

Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order Out of Chaos. Bantam.

Ruthanam, M., Reddy, P., & Pillay, D. (2021). Teachers’ choices of teaching methods for environmental education: A case study of Life Skills teachers at a primary school in South Africa. Southern African Journal of Environmental Education, 37, 124-142. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajee.v37i1.9.

Ryan, P. G., Maclean, K., & Weideman, E. A. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on urban street litter in South Africa. Environmental Processes, 7, 1303-1312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-020-00472-1.

Sebaeng, L. (2022). Challenges facing the secondary school teachers in the implementation of curriculum and assessment policy statement in Mankweng Circuit, Limpopo Province [Master’s thesis, University of Limpopo, South Africa]. http://ulspace.ul.ac.za/handle/10386/4221.

Snyder, K. J., Acker-Hocevar, M., & Wolf, K. M. (1995, September 22-24). Chaos theory as a lens for advancing quality schooling [Conference presentation]. School Management Institute College of Education University of South Florida.

Spennemann, D. H. R. (2021). COVID face masks: Policy shift results in increased littering. Sustainability, 13(17), Article 9875. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179875.

Strydom, A., & Bezuidenhout, R. (2018). Qualitative data collection. In F. Plooy-Cilliers, C. Davis, & R. Bezuidenhout (Eds.), Research Matters (7th ed.) (pp. 173-194). Juta.

Trygestad, J. (1997, March 24-28). Chaos in the classroom: An application of Chaos theory [Conference presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

Tsotetsi, N. (2021). Assessing the implementation of environmental education in selected Vosloorus township schools [Master’s thesis, University of South Africa]. https://uir.unisa.ac.za/handle/10500/28491.

Wang, X., Loh, L., & Sera, K. (2023). Challenges of teachers to integrate ESD design activities in technology education in Japanese public junior high schools. In L. Buck, H. Grierson, & E. Bohemia (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, E&PDE 2023 (Article 1144). https://doi.org/10.35199/EPDE.2023.23.

Wolhuter, C. C., & Seroto, J. (2020). Guidelines for a research project. In J. Seroto, M. N. Davids, & C. C. Wolhuter (Eds.), Decolonising education in the global south: Historical and comparative international perspectives (pp. 282-304). Pearson.

Announcement

EDUPIJ News!

► Journal Metrics

8% acceptance rate
3.4 (2023) CiteScore (Scopus)
Q2 (2023) CiteScore Best Quartile
0.42 (2023) Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

► EDUPIJ Statistics from Scopus

CiteScore: 3.4, view Scopus page

► Educational Process: International Journal is member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

► New issue coming soon! (Volume 13 Issue 2, 2024)