| |
Apps to Promote Computational Thinking and Coding Skills to Young Age Children: A Pedagogical Challenge for the 21st Century Learners pp. 7-13 | Available Online: March 2022 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2022.111.1 Stamatios Papadakis
Abstract
Keywords: Mobile applications (apps); computational thinking; basic coding skills; preschool age; pre-primary school age. |
|
| |
An Exploration of Literary Genres Through the Eyes of Pre-Service English Teachers pp. 14-27 | Available Online: March 2022 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2022.111.2 Gamze Erdem Cosgun
Abstract
Keywords: Literature, genres, English teacher. |
|
| |
The Impact of Work Environment and Teacher Attributes on Teacher Job Satisfaction pp. 28-39 | Available Online: March 2022 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2022.111.3 Hsiang-Wei Ker, Ying-Haur Lee, Shu-Meei Ho
Abstract
Keywords: Teacher job satisfaction, work environment, teacher characteristics, TIMSS. |
|
| |
The Influence of Educational Employees’ Policy Alienation on Their Change Cynicism: An Investigation in the Turkish Public-Schooling Context pp. 40-64 | Available Online: February 2022 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2022.111.4 Tijen Tulubas
Abstract
Keywords: Policy alienation, change cynicism, educational employee, teacher, school administrator. |
|
| |
The Mentoring Experiences of Early Career and Senior Academics in a Multicampus University in South Africa pp. 65-85 | Available Online: February 2022 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2022.111.5 Yaw Owusu-Agyeman
Abstract
Keywords: Early career academics, mentoring, social constructivist theory, institutional structure, institutional culture, multicampus setting. |
|
| |
Trends for the Segregation Practices of International Students: A Review of Higher Education in Turkey pp. 86-104 | Available Online: February 2022 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2022.111.6 Tugba Hosgorur, Ilker Aysel
Abstract Background/purpose - This study aims to explain international student mobility within Turkish higher education in terms of the push-pull factors that affect students’ choices to attend Turkey based on international students studying at a provincial university in Mugla, Turkey. Materials/methods - The current study was implemented through a qualitative approach originated from the interpretivist paradigm. This qualitative study is a case study, with data collected through semi-structured interviews. Results - The reasons pushing students to study abroad were observed as economic such as due to high unemployment rates in their country of origin; political issues such as a state of war; educational issues such as low quality education; or personal issues such as a wish to experience a different culture. Conclusion - The reasons behind choosing Turkey for higher education were observed to be economic factors such as Turkey’s low-cost living; political factors such as bureaucratic regulations being more accommodating for students recognised as refugees; educational factors. Such as superior quality higher education; and, geographical and cultural proximity. Keywords: International students, segregation, higher education, push-pull factors, higher education policies. |
|
| |
Mentorship Practices and Research Productivity Among Early-Career Educational Psychologists in Universities pp. 105-126 | Available Online: March 2022 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2022.111.7 Abigail E. Okon, Valentine J. Owan, Mercy V. Owan
Abstract Background/purpose – This study analyzed the contribution of three mentorship practices relatively and cumulatively to the research productivity of early-career academics in the field of educational psychology in universities. The study was conducted in the South-South region of Nigeria. Materials/methods – The research method adopted was the quantitative approach, following the ex-post facto research design. The study’s population covered 723 early-career researchers (ECRs) in educational psychology distributed across 19 universities located in South-South Nigeria. The “Mentorship Practices and Research Productivity Questionnaire” (MPRPQ) was the instrument used for data collection. The questionnaire was designed by the researchers and then validated by three experts. Reliability analysis was performed using the Cronbach approach with estimates of .80, .79, .87, and .91 obtained for the four clusters. Primary data were collected from the field after copies of the instrument had been administered to respondents. Results – Mentorship practices were generally revealed to significantly contribute to the research productivity of ECRs in educational psychology in universities. Specifically, the adoption of cloning and apprenticeship approaches to mentorship contributed substantially to the ECRs’ research productivity. However, the study highlighted that nurturing contributed only negligibly to the ECRs’ research productivity. Conclusion – Mentorship practices are important determinants to the research productivity of early-career educational psychologists. In order to boost the productive research capacities of ECRs, there is a need for institutions to strengthen their mentorship practices. Keywords: Apprenticeship, cloning, early-career researchers, nurturing, psychologists. |
EDUPIJ News!
ANNOUNCEMENT
Message from the Editor-in-Chief,
We would like to inform our authors, reviewers, and stakeholders that EDUPIJ has entered Scopus’s re-evaluation process, as officially communicated (dated 2025-12-09). This assessment is a standard quality assurance practice applied to indexed journals and aims to ensure sustained editorial quality, ethical integrity, and alignment with Scopus’s evolving evaluation framework.
EDUPIJ welcomes this process and views it as an opportunity to further consolidate its editorial governance, strengthen publication ethics, and enhance peer-review rigor.
Strengthening Editorial and Ethical Standards
To ensure full compliance with international best practices and to proactively address Scopus evaluation criteria, the following measures have been formally implemented:
1. Selective Acceptance Policy for 2026 and Beyond
In response to increased submission volume in 2025 (see Journal Metrics: https://edupij.com/index/sayfa/18/journal-metrics), EDUPIJ will adopt a more selective acceptance policy starting in 2026 and continuing in the years ahead. In doing so, the geographic distribution of authors will also be taken into account to ensure that editorial decisions are informed by transparent, year-to-year submission and authorship patterns. Acceptance rates will be carefully aligned with editorial capacity to ensure a rigorous double-blind peer review process supported by active reviewer engagement and uncompromised editorial oversight. This policy reflects our commitment to quality-driven growth rather than volume-based expansion, and it directly addresses observations that the geographic spread of authors has changed significantly during the same period by ensuring that any such shifts are systematically monitored and considered within our quality assurance framework.
In line with this approach, we have adopted a Publication Volume Policy, enacted on 2025-12-07, which establishes clear upper limits on annual publication volume and defines a framework for maintaining EDUPIJ’s output at sustainable, long-term levels, comparable to pre-2025 volumes under normal conditions. This policy is also publicly available at https://edupij.com/index/sayfa/41/publication-volume-journal-metrics-policy.
From 2026 onwards, our objective is to maintain a moderate and stable annual volume, prioritising quality and selectivity rather than growth.
2. Enhanced Author and Manuscript Integrity Screening
All submissions now undergo mandatory integrity checks, including automated screening for retraction history and potential ethical risks prior to peer review. These procedures are designed to safeguard originality, research integrity, and transparency at every stage of the editorial process.
3. Establishment of a Publication Ethics Review Committee
A dedicated Publication Ethics Review Committee has been constituted to evaluate high-risk submissions, oversee ethical investigations when necessary, and ensure consistent adherence to COPE guidelines and internationally recognized publishing standards. All ethical decisions are documented and managed through a structured, transparent process.
Ongoing Commitment:
EDUPIJ remains firmly committed to rigorous double-blind peer review, transparent editorial policies, responsible scholarly communication, and the advancement of high-quality educational research at an international level.
Our journal continues to demonstrate steady progress in terms of international visibility, indexing coverage, and citation performance. We are confident that the Scopus re-evaluation process will further support the journal’s long-term sustainability and academic impact.
We sincerely thank our authors, reviewers, and the broader scholarly community for their continued trust and contribution to EDUPIJ.
Sincerely,
Prof. Turgut Karaköse, Editor-in-Chief
Posted: 2025-12-09