Volume 11 Issue 1 (2022)

The Impact of Work Environment and Teacher Attributes on Teacher Job Satisfaction

pp. 28-39  |  Published Online: March 2022  |  DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2022.111.3

Hsiang-Wei Ker, Ying-Haur Lee, Shu-Meei Ho


Background/purpose – Teachers play a critical role in student learning processes and in their academic success, and as such their job satisfaction directly impacts upon their teaching efficacy and lecture quality. In light of the importance of job satisfaction in educational practice, this study investigates the impact of work environment factors and personal attributes on teachers’ job satisfaction.

Materials/methods – This study utilizes data from the 2019 TIMSS (Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study) for eighth-grade science teachers from the United States.

Results – Teacher job satisfaction showed a strong association with the majority of work environment factors and professional development factors, whilst no significant relationship was found with teacher background.

Conclusion – Teachers’ job satisfaction significantly impacts on their performance, retention, and teaching efficacy. Through analysis of the TIMSS 2019 dataset, it was seen that teacher job satisfaction is primarily affected by the environment in which they work and also their professional development. These results concur with other findings reported in the literature. However, contrary to prior works, this study revealed no association between job satisfaction and teachers’ background. As a result, schools should prioritize creating a congenial work environment in order to improve teaching quality. The limitations of this research and suggestions for future work are also discussed.

Keywords: Teacher job satisfaction, work environment, teacher characteristics, TIMSS.


Cotter, K. E., Centurino, V. A. S., & Mullis, I. V. S. (2020). Developing the TIMSS 2019 mathematics and science achievement instruments. In M. O. Martin, M. von Davier, & I. V. S. Mullis (Eds.), Methods and Procedures: TIMSS 2019 Technical Report (pp. 1.1-1.36). Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/methods/chapter-1.html

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science24(2), 97-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Daryanto, E. (2014). Individual characteristics, job characteristics, and career development: a study on vocational school teachers’ satisfaction in Indonesia. American Journal of Educational Research2(8), 698-702. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-8-20

Evans, L. (1997). Addressing problems of conceptualization and construct validity in researching teachers’ job satisfaction. Educational Research, 39(3), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188970390307

Fishbein, B., Foy, P., & Yin, L. (2021). TIMSS 2019 User Guide for the International Database. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://timss2019.org/international-database/downloads/TIMSS-2019-User-Guide-for-the-International-Database-2nd-Ed.pdf

García-Crespo, F. J., Fernández-Alonso, R., & Muñiz, J. (2021). Academic resilience in European countries: The role of teachers, families, and student profiles. PLoS One, 16(7). http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253409

Gülbahar, B. (2020). Investigation of the relationship between perception of supervisor support, perceived school effectiveness, work engagement, job satisfaction and organizational cynic attitude of teachers. Participatory Educational Research, 7(3), 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.

Hsieh, J. Y., Liao, P. W., & Lee, Y. H. (2022). Teacher motivation and relationship within school contexts as drivers of urban teacher efficacy in Taipei city. The Asia - Pacific Education Researcher, 31(1), 23-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00535-9

Ingersoll, R. M., & May, H. (2012). The magnitude, destinations, and determinants of mathematics and science teacher turnover. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(4), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373712454326

Kim, T., & Lee, Y. (2020) Principal instructional leadership for teacher participation in professional development: evidence from Japan, Singapore, and South Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(2), 261-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09616-x

Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741-756. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0019237

Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2011). The occupational commitment and intention to quit of practicing and pre-service teachers: Influence of self-efficacy, job stress, and teaching context. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(2), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.01.002

Liu, X. S., & Ramsey, J. (2008). Teachers´ job satisfaction: Analyses of the teacher followup survey in the United States for 2000-2001. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 24(5), 1173-1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.010

Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Rand McNally.

Ma, X., & MacMillan, R. B. (1999). Influences of workplace conditions on teachers’ job satisfaction. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(1), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679909597627

Maren, S. L., Ertesvåg, S. K., & Virtanen, T. (2021). Patterns of teachers’ instructional support quality and the association with job satisfaction and collegial collaboration. Educational Psychology, 41(10), 1300-1318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021.1988519

Menon, M. E., & Athanasoula-Reppa, A. (2011). Job satisfaction among secondary school teachers: The role of gender and experience. School Leadership & Management, 31(5), 435-450. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2011.614942

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 International Results in Mathematics and Science. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/international-results/

Rosenberg, M. G., & An, Y. (2019). Supporting Science Teachers’ Learner-Centered Technology Integration through Situated Mentoring. Educational Process: International Journal, 8(4), 248-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2019.84.4

Sadeghi, K., Ghaderi, F., & Abdollahpour, Z. (2021). Self-reported teaching effectiveness and job satisfaction among teachers: the role of subject matter and other demographic variables. Heliyon, 7(6), e07193. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844021012962

Salami, M. A., Makela, C., & Miranda, M. A. (2017). Assessing changes in teachers’ attitudes toward interdisciplinary STEM teaching. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27, 63-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9341-0

Sims, S. (2020). Modelling the relationships between teacher working conditions, job satisfaction and workplace mobility. British Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 301-320. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3578

Smet, M. (2022). Professional development and teacher job satisfaction: Evidence from a multilevel model. Mathematics, 10(1), Article 51. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math10010051

Yin, L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). Creating and interpreting the TIMSS 2019 context questionnaire scales. In M. O. Martin, M. von Davier, & I. V. S. Mullis (Eds.), Methods and Procedures: TIMSS 2019 Technical Report (pp. 16.1-16.331). Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/methods/chapter-16.html

Zhu, Y. (2013). A review of job satisfaction. Asian Social Science, 9(1),293-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n1p293

Zülfü, D. (2010).Teachers’ job satisfaction levels. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1069-1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.287



► Journal Metrics

  • 8% acceptance rate
  • 3.4 (2023) CiteScore (Scopus)
  • Q2 (2023) CiteScore Best Quartile
  • 0.42 (2023) Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

EDUPIJ Statistics from Scopus

CiteScore: 3.4, view Scopus page

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

► Educational Process: International Journal is member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). 

► New issue coming soon! (Volume 13 Issue 2, 2024)