Volume 3 Issue 1-2 (2014)

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Social Networks and their Usage by High School Students

pp. 7-18  |  Published Online: November 2014  |  DOI: 10.12973/edupij.2014.312.1

Chich-Jen Shieh, Murat Demirkol


Social networks are virtual environments created by humans through software and programs. Today, social networks have expanded and become more commonplace. Individuals identify themselves through these internet networks and use their communication methods to enable them to get in touch with people from the same or different cultures. It is known that social networks have advantages as well as some disadvantages. The main purpose of this study is to determine why, how, and how frequently students use online social communication networks, and to identify the effects of these social networks on their education and social lives according to the opinions of high school students. In this study, one of each of the three high education institutions in a city center were randomly selected and the opinions of 63 students studying at different grades of these schools were collected. According to the results of this study, a significant percentage of participants regularly benefit from social network websites. The majority of opinions indicate that the participants use social network websites with the aim of communication and education.

Keywords: social network, high school students, qualitative research


Bashan, F. (2011). Assimilating of Internet with its Various Aspects by Turkish Society: Sample of Karaman, Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation, Karamanoglu Mehmetbey Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Isletme Anabilim Dali.

Berners-Lee, T., Cailliau, R., Groff, J.F., & Pollermann, B. (2010). World-Wide Web: the information universe. Internet Research, 20(4), 461-471.

Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. (2010). Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 3(38), 16-31.

Denzin, N. K. (2000). The practices and politics of interpretation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.),Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Diestel, R. (2000). Graphtheory {graduatetexts in mathematics; 173}. Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH.

Donath, J. (2007). Signals in social supernets. Journal of ComputerMediated Communication, 13(1), 231-251.

Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of ComputerMediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.

Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Community & Society, 8(2), 125-147.

Kandemir, V. (2011). General Purpose Pro Grammable Controller Design. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Istanbul Teknik Universitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu.

Karasar, N. (1995). Arastirmalarda rapor hazirlama. Ankara: 3A Arastirma Egitim Danismanligi

Keten, B. (2012). Effects of Information Retrieval Process on Decision Making and Problem Solving: An Empirical Study. Turk Kutuphaneciligi, 26(3), 476-500.

Kim, W., Jeong, O.R., & Lee, S.W. (2010). On social Web sites. Information systems, 35(2), 215-236.

Kiper, M. (2004). Teknoloji Transfer Mekanizmalari ve Bu Kapsamda Universite–Sanayi isbirligi. Teknoloji, 59.

Kirschner, P.A., & Karpinski, A.C. (2010). Facebook and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior 26(6), 1237-1245.

Martinez, J.S.V., Lopez, P.G., & Infante, J.C.G. (2011, February). Execution time Validation of the mathematical models of an electric motor in Soft Real Time simulation. In Electrical Communications and Computers (CONIELECOMP), 2011 21st International Conference on (pp.131-136). IEEE.

Mazman G. (2009). Adoption Process of Social Network and Their Usage in Educational Context, Unpublished master thesis, Hacettepe Universitesi, Ankara.

May, T. (1996). Social research-issues, methods and process. Buckingham: Open University.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousands Oaks.CA: Sage.

Morris, R. D. (2011). Web 3.0: Implications for online learning. TechTrends, 55(1), 42-46.

Ofcom, (2008). Socialnetworking a quantitative and qualitative research report into attitudes, behaviours and use, Research Document, Office of Communications, 2 April, pp.1-72. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/advice/media_literacy/medlitpub/medlitpubrss/    socialnetworking/report.pdf.

O’Reilly, T. (2005). Media http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/ what-is- web-20.html.

Ozdemir, M. (2010). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Study On Methodology Problem In Social Sciences. Eskisehir Osmangazi Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1).

Sendag, S. (2008). Web’de Yeni Egilimler: Ogrenme Ortamlarina Entegrasyonu. International Educational Technology Conference, Eskisehir, Turkey.

Sheeks, M., & Birchmeier, Z. (2007). Shyness, sociability, and the use of computer-mediated communication in relationship development. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 10(1), 64-70.

Shen, Z. (2011). Lecture Notes for CSDI1400 Computers: Past, Present and Future. Department of Computer Science and Technology Plymouth State University.

Valkenburg, P.M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A.P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well-being and social self-esteem. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 9(5), 584-590.

Vossen, G., & Hagemann, S. (2010). Unleashing Web 2.0: From concepts to creativity. Burlington: Elsevier.

Yucel, A. S., & Devecioglu, S. (2012). The Usage of Information And Communication Technologies in Sport Education. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 7(2).



► Journal Metrics

  • 8% acceptance rate
  • 3.4 (2023) CiteScore (Scopus)
  • Q2 (2023) CiteScore Best Quartile
  • 0.42 (2023) Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

EDUPIJ Statistics from Scopus

CiteScore: 3.4, view Scopus page

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

► Educational Process: International Journal is member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). 

► New issue coming soon! (Volume 13 Issue 2, 2024)