The Role of the Critical Friend in Supporting Principals to Lead School Improvement

Background/purpose. This study explores the different ways in which critical friend roles are conceptualized. The critical friend role is adaptive by nature, with significant ambiguity surrounding it, which has resulted in disjointed and fragmented literature. This study sought to provide insights into the varied and potentially boundary-spanning roles that critical friends may need to draw upon when supporting school-based improvement work.

Materials/methods. A focus group methodology was adopted to examine the type of role that experienced critical friends anticipated that they would be required to undertake as part of a longitudinal school improvement program. A semi-structured interview protocol guide was used to uncover the participants' prior experiences when undertaking the role of a critical friend.

Results. This study analyzed the work of five critical friends whose primary role was to support principals to lead improvement in improving teaching and learning in mathematics. The results show that critical friends defined four key archetypes they anticipated to utilize during the professional learning program.

Conclusion. The study highlighted that the role of the critical friend in supporting improvement is quite varied. The critical friend role can differ depending on the context, level of trust in the relationship, and the core work that is to be undertaken.

Keywords: Critical friend, principals, school improvement

References

Campbell, A., McNamara, O., & Gilroy, P. (2004). Practitioner Research and Professional Development in Education.

Capobianco, B. M., McCauley, V., & Flynn, P. (2024). The influence of critical friendships on secondary student teachers engaged in collaborative action research. Educational Action Research, 32(5), 746–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2023.2263492

Charmaz, K. (2014a). Constructing grounded theory. Sage.

Charmaz, K. (2014b). Grounded Theory in Global Perspective: Reviews by International Researchers. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(9), 1074–1084. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414545235

Coghlan, D., & Brydon-Miller, M. (2014). Critical friend. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Action Research, 1, 245–246.

Coppola, R., Rocha, D. J., & Woodard, R. (2021). Toward a Bidirectional and Co-Constructed Mentorship: Rethinking the Mentor and Student–Teacher Relationship. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 70(1), 252–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/23813377211033559

Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (1993). Through the lens of a critical friend. Educational Leadership, 51, 49–49.

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage

Curry, M. (2008). Critical friends groups: The possibilities and limitations embedded in teacher professional communities aimed at instructional improvement and school reform. Teachers college record, 110(4), 733-774. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810811000401

Dennis, B. K. (2014). Understanding participant experiences: Reflections of a novice research participant. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13(1), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691401300121

Doherty, J., MacBeath, J., Jardine, S., Smith, I., & McCall, J. (2001). Do schools need critical friends. Improving School Effectiveness, 138–151.

Dunn, R. (2023). Teacher Inquiry: Towards a typology of a teacher’s inquiry disposition. Professional Development in Education, 49(5), 884–898. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1879219

Durand-Bush, N., Salmela, J. H., & Thompson, K. A. (2004). Le rôle joué par les parents dans le développement et le maintien de la performance athlétique experte: Staps, n o 64(2), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.3917/sta.064.0015

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557

Fletcher, A. (2019). An invited outsider or an enriched insider? Challenging contextual knowledge as a critical friend researcher. Educational Researchers and the Regional University: Agents of Regional-Global Transformations, 75–92.

Gerdes, D. A., & Conn, J. H. (2001). A user-friendly look at qualitative research methods. Physical Educator, 58(4), 183.

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.

Gould, D., Collins, K., Lauer, L., & Chung, Y. (2007). Coaching life skills through football: A study of award winning high school coaches. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 19(1), 16-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200601113786

Gould, D., Lauer, L., Rolo, C., Jannes, C., & Pennisi, N. (2008). The Role of Parents in Tennis Success: Focus Group Interviews with Junior Coaches. The Sport Psychologist, 22(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.22.1.18

Guerin, B. (1999). Social behaviors as determined by different arrangements of social consequences: Social loafing, social facilitation, deindividuation, and a modified social loafing. The Psychological Record, 49, 565–577.

Gurr, D., & Huerta, M. (2013). The Role of the Critical Friend in Leadership and School Improvement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 3084–3090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.356

Hattie, J. (2015). High impact leadership. Educational Leadership, 72(5), 36–40.

Kenigs, O. A., Bravo, C. V., Turra, Y., & Hernández, M. E. M. (2023). Implications of a critical friend in the resignificance of pedagogical leadership practices. International Journal of Leadership in Education. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13603124.2023.2272137

Krueger, R. A. (1998). Analyzing and reporting focus group results. Sage.

Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2019). Analyzing Focus Group Data. In U. Kuckartz & S. Rädiker, Analyzing Qualitative Data with MAXQDA (pp. 201–217). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15671-8_15

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newberry Park.

MacKenzie, B. (2015). Critical friendships for coaching and mentoring in writing. The Future of Coaching and Mentoring: Evolution, Revolution or Extinction? Part 2.

MacPhail, A., Tannehill, D., & Ataman, R. (2024). The role of the critical friend in supporting and enhancing professional learning and development. Professional Development in Education, 50(4), 597–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1879235

Morgan, D. L., Krueger, R. A., & King, J. A. (1998). The focus group guidebook. Sage.

Mulford, W., & Edmunds, W. (2010). Educational investment in Australian schooling: Serving public purposes in Tasmanian primary schools. University Of Tasmania.

Noe, R. A., Greenberger, D. B., & Wang, S. (2002). Mentoring: What we know and where we might go. In Research in personnel and human resources management (pp. 129–173). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

OECD. (2012). Preparing Teachers and Developing School Leaders for the 21st Century: Lessons from around the World (A. Schleicher, Ed.). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264174559-en

Riley, P., Rahimi, M., & Arnold, B. (2021). The New Zealand Primary Principal Occupational Health, Safety and Wellbeing Survey 2020 Data. Deakin University. https://www.nzeiteriuroa.org.nz/assets/downloads/The-New-Zealand-Primary-Principal-Occupational-Health-Safety-and-Wellbeing-Survey-2020data-Final2.pdf

Robinson, V. (2007). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: Making sense of the evidence.

Schuck, S. (2011). Resisting complacency: my teaching through an outsider’s eyes. In Schuck, S., & Pereira, P. (eds) What Counts in Teaching Mathematics. Self Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices (vol 11). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0461-9_5

Swaffield, S., & MacBeath, J. (2005). School self‐evaluation and the role of a critical friend. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640500147037

Szymanski, C., Pesquita, A., Brennan, A. A., Perdikis, D., Enns, J. T., Brick, T. R., Müller, V., & Lindenberger, U. (2017). Teams on the same wavelength perform better: Inter-brain phase synchronization constitutes a neural substrate for social facilitation. NeuroImage, 152, 425–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.013

Urquhart, C., & Fernández, W. (2013). Using grounded theory method in information systems: The researcher as blank slate and other myths. Journal of Information Technology, 28(3), 224-236. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2012.34

Wepner, S. B., Henk, W. A., & Broege, N. (2024). Critical friend mentoring: Strategic sounding boards for academic deans. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 32(5), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2024.2372282

Wiesche, M., Jurisch, M. C., Yetton, P. W., & Krcmar, H. (2017). Grounded theory methodology in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 41(3), 685-A9. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.3.02

Announcement

EDUPIJ Citation Metrics

EDUPIJ News!

► Educational Process International Journal has changed to publish in article number order instead of in page range order beginning with Volume 14 (2025).