Abstract

Conclusion.  The use of cutting-edge technologies, such as the NAO robot, holds significant potential for driving innovation in higher education. These tools contribute to more interactive and effective teaching, supporting the development of essential cognitive skills and improving educational outcomes.

Keywords: Complex thinking, social robotics, teachers, educational innovation, higher education, Education 4.0, NAO robots, research methodology

Aizikovitsh-Udi, E., & Cheng, D. (2015). Developing critical thinking skills from dispositions to abilities: Mathematics education from early childhood to high school. Creative Education, 6(4), 455–462. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.64045

Arredondo-Trapero, F., Vázquez-Parra, J. C., & de la Garza, J. (2016). Innovation factors for competitiveness in the Pacific Alliance. An approach from the world economic forum. Estudios Gerenciales, 32(141), 299-308.

Baena-Rojas, J. J., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Mazo-Cuervo, D. M., & López-Caudana, E. O. (2022). Traits of complex thinking: A bibliometric review of a disruptive construct in education. Journal of Intelligence, 10(3), Article 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030037

Bano, S., & Ali, M. M. (2022, September 1). Teaching learning resources and ICT platforms in higher educational institutions. Scholarly Research Journal for Humanity Science & English Language, 10(53), Article 11646. https://doi.org/10.21922/srjhsel.v10i53.11646

Basha, I. N. U., & Abbas, M. (2011). Managing ICT resources in e-learning environment: Challenges, issues and a proposed model. 2011 Third International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Communication Systems and Networks, 319–322. https://doi.org/10.1109/CICSyN.2011.73

Behar-Horenstein, L. S., Schneider-Mitchell, G., & Graff, R. (2009). Promoting the teaching of critical thinking skills through faculty development. Journal of Dental Education, 73(6), 665–675. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2009.73.6.tb04746.x

Bemelmans, R. (2015). A study of the possibilities and effect of assistive robots in the intramural elderly healthcare. Unpublished Thesis, Maastricht University.   https://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20151111rb

Bustamante-Meza, L. Y., Torres-Oliveros, S., & Salcedo-Ospino, J. (2022). Desarrollo de habilidades STEM para docentes de educación infantil. Praxis, 18(2).

Cheng, M., & Bakhoum, E. (2021, November 1). Tracking control design and implementation of multiaxial controller for social robotic devices. In Volume 7A: Dynamics, Vibration, and Control. https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-70510

Cui, Y., Song, X., Hu, Q., Li, Y., Sharma, P., & Khapre, S. (2022, April). Human-robot interaction in higher education for predicting student engagement. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 99, Article 107827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.107827

Daglarli, E., Kose, H., & Gunel, G. O. (2017). Rehabilitation applications using brain-inspired cognitive architecture for humanoid robots. 2017 25th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU), Article 7960677. https://doi.org/10.1109/siu.2017.7960677

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x

Dragičević, N., Vladova, G., & Ullrich, A. (2023, January 4). Design thinking capabilities in the digital world: A bibliometric analysis of emerging trends. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1012478

Dupont, P. E., Nelson, B. J., Goldfarb, M., Hannaford, B., Menciassi, A., O'Malley, M. K., Simaan, N., Valdastri, P., & Yang, G.-Z. (2021). A decade retrospective of medical robotics research from 2010 to 2020. Science Robotics, 6(60). https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.abi8017  

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., & Tondeur, J. (2015). Teachers’ beliefs and uses of technology to support 21st-century teaching and learning. In H. Fives & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International Handbook of Research on Teacher Beliefs (pp. 403–418). Routledge.

Feidakis, M., Gkolompia, I., Emmanouilidou, S., Marnelaki, A., Marathaki, K., & Agrianiti, E. (2023). NAO robot, an educational assistant in training, educational and therapeutic sessions. EDUCON2023 Proceedings, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/educon54358.2023.10125229

Halili, S. H. (2019). Technological advancements in education 4.0. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 7(1), 63–69.

Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62–66.

Horn, M. B., & Goldstein, M. (2018). Putting school budgets in teachers' hands: What if end-users in the classroom made purchasing decisions? Education Next, 18(4), 82–84.

Hsu, S., & Kuan, P. Y. (2013). The impact of multilevel factors on technology integration: The case of Taiwanese grade 1–9 teachers and schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9269-y

Idris, N. Z., & Halabi Azahari, M. (2024). The impact of information technology on middle school student engagement. International Journal of Research in Education Humanities and Commerce, 5(2), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.37602/IJREHC.2024.5213

Inamorato dos Santos, A., Chinkes, E., Carvalho, M. A., Solórzano, C. M., & Marroni, L. S. (2023). The digital competence of academics in higher education: is the glass half empty or half full?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00376-0 

Ireh, M. (2010). Budgeting and funding school technology: essential considerations. School Business Affairs, 76(7), 18.

Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, N. H. (2016). The effects of secondary teachers’ technostress on the intention to use technology in South Korea. Computers & Education, 95, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.004

Kearney, M. L. (2009). Higher education, research, and innovation: Charting the course of the changing dynamics of the knowledge society. In Higher Education, Research, and Innovation: Changing Dynamics (Vol. 7, pp. 1–15). UNESCO.

Kennedy, J., Lemaignan, S., & Belpaeme, T. (2016). The cautious attitude of teachers towards social robots in schools. In Robots 4 Learning Workshop at IEEE RO-MAN 2016.

Khaksar, S. M. S., Slade, B., Wallace, J., & Gurinder, K. (2020). Critical success factors for application of social robots in special developmental schools: Development, adoption, and implementation. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(4), 677–696. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2019-0312

Kim, J. S., Kang, D., Choi, J., & Kwak, S. S. (2022, August 29). Domestic social robots as companions or assistants? The effects of the robot positioning on the consumer purchase intentions. 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900844

Latip, A., & Hardinata, A. (2020, June 24). Implementation of STEM-Robotics as High School Intra-curricular. Thabiea: Journal of Natural Science Teaching, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v3i1.6770

Lesort, T., Lomonaco, V., Stoian, A., Maltoni, D., Filliat, D., & Díaz-Rodríguez, N. (2020). Continual learning for robotics: Definition, framework, learning strategies, opportunities and challenges. Information Fusion, 58, 52–68.

Lopez-Caudana, E., Ramirez-Montoya, M. S., Martínez-Pérez, S., & Rodríguez-Abitia, G. (2020). Using robotics to enhance active learning in mathematics: A multi-scenario study. Mathematics, 8(12), 2163.

Lopez-Caudana, E., Reyes, G. B., Acevedo, R. G., Ponce, P., Mazon, N., & Hernandez, J. M. (2019). RoboTICs: Implementation of a robotic assistive platform in a mathematics high school class. In 2019 IEEE 28th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE) (pp. 1589–1594). IEEE.

Morin, E. (2005). Introducción al pensamiento complejo. Editorial Gedisa.

Mubin, O., Alhashmi, M., Baroud, R., & Alnajjar, F. S. (2019, December 2). Humanoid robots as teaching assistants in an Arab school. Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction.https://doi.org/10.1145/3369457.3369517

Oliveira, A., Feyzi Behnagh, R., Ni, L., Mohsinah, A. A., Burgess, K. J., & Guo, L. (2019). Emerging technologies as pedagogical tools for teaching and learning science: A literature review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 149–160.

Ozdamli, F., & Cavus, N. (2021). Knowledge sharing technologies in higher education: Preferences of CIS students in Cyprus. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 1833–1846.

Patiño, A., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., & Ibarra-Vazquez, G. (2023). Trends and research outcomes of technology-based interventions for complex thinking development in higher education: a review of scientific publications. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), 1-25.

Paul, N., Ramesh, S., Bhattacharya, C., Ramesh, J., & Vijayan, P. (2021, May 30). Can non-humanoid social robots reduce workload of special educators: An online and in-premises field study. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). https://doi.org/10.1109/icra48506.2021.9561633

Philipsen, B., Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., Vanslambrouck, S., & Zhu, C. (2019). Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: A systematic meta-aggregative review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67, 1145–1174.

Piedade, J. M. N. (2021). Pre-service and in-service teachers’ interest, knowledge, and self-confidence in using educational robotics in learning activities. Educação & Formação, 6(1).

Ponce, P., Molina, A., Caudana, E. O. L., Reyes, G. B., & Parra, N. M. (2019). Improving education in developing countries using robotic platforms. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 13, 1401–1422.

Qian, Y. (2009). New media literacy in 3-D virtual learning environments. In Handbook of Research on New Media Literacy at the K-12 Level (pp. 257–269).

Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Castillo-Martínez, I. M., Sanabria-Z, J., & Miranda, J. (2022). Complex thinking in the framework of Education 4.0 and open innovation: A systematic literature review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1), 4.

Ranasinghe, A. I., & Leisher, D. (2009). The benefit of integrating technology into the classroom. International Mathematical Forum, 4(40), 1955–1961.

Rapti, S., & Sapounidis, T. (2023). Critical thinking, communication, collaboration, creativity in kindergarten with educational robotics: A scoping review (2012–2023). Computers & Education, 210, 104968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104968

Reyes, G. E. B., López, E., Ponce, P., & Mazon, N. (2021). Role assignment analysis of an assistive robotic platform in a high school mathematics class through a gamification and usability evaluation. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13, 1063–1078.

Rodríguez-Abitia, G., Martínez-Pérez, S., Ramirez-Montoya, M. S., & Lopez-Caudana, E. (2020). Digital gap in universities and challenges for quality education: A diagnostic study in Mexico and Spain. Sustainability, 12(21), 9069.

Sah, R. (2014). History and contemporary relevance of information and communication technology (ICT) in higher education. Quest-The Journal of UGC-HRDC Nainital, 8(3), 195. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-0035.2014.01084.5

Saif, S. M., Ansarullah, S. I., Ben Othman, M. T., Alshmrany, S., Shafiq, M., & Hamam, H. (2022, June 5). Impact of ICT in modernizing the global education industry to yield better academic outreach. Sustainability, 14(11), 6884. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116884

Suárez-Brito, P., López-Caudana, E., Baena-Rojas, J., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. (2022). Eliciting complex thinking through open educational resource projects. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 13(4), 56-77.

Tuna, G., Tuna, A., Ahmetoglu, E., & Kuscu, H. (2019, September 30). A survey on the use of humanoid robots in primary education: Prospects, research challenges, and future research directions. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(3), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v14i3.3291

United Nations. (2024). Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all. United Nations (UN). Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal4

United Nations. (2024a). Reduce inequality within and among countries. United Nations (UN). Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal10

United Nations. (2024b). Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the Global Partnership for Sustainable Development. United Nations (UN). Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal17

Vascan, T. (2022, August). Robotics in STEAM education. Acta Et Commentationes: Științe Ale Educației, 28(2), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.36120/2587-3636.v28i2.41-49

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.

Vongkulluksn, V. W., Xie, K., & Hawk, N. A. (2020). Investing time in technology: Teachers’ value beliefs and time cost profiles for classroom technology integration. Teachers College Record, 122(12), 1–38.

Xie, K., Di Tosto, G., Chen, S. B., & Vongkulluksn, V. W. (2018). A systematic review of design and technology components of educational digital resources. Computers & Education, 127, 90–106.

Yerdelen-Damar, S., Boz, Y., & Aydın-Günbatar, S. (2017). Mediated effects of technology competencies and experiences on relations among attitudes towards technology use, technology ownership, and self-efficacy about technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26, 394–405.

Yin, R. K., Clarke, C., Cotner, B., & Lee, R. (2012). Case study methods. In Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 111–122). Routledge.