Integrating Mastery Adaptive and Problem-Solving (MAPS) Digital Technology Skills into a Thai Community College Student Learning Model

Background/purpose. The increasing integration of digital technology in education underscores the need for instructional models that support personalized, skill-based, and problem-solving-focused learning. While traditional pedagogies often fail to address these needs comprehensively, this study proposes that the Mastery Adaptive Problem-Solving (MAPS) Model offers an innovative solution for enhancing digital technology skills (DTS) and academic achievement (AA) among Thai community college students.

Materials/methods. The MAPS Model incorporates mastery learning, micro-learning, adaptive learning, and problem-based learning (PBL) into a six-step framework. Expert validation of the model was conducted using the Connoisseurship method via focus group discussions. A quasi-experimental design was employed to evaluate the model's implementation with 19 second-year Thai community college students. Student DTS and AA were measured using validated tools with reliability indices exceeding 0.80. Retention of skills and knowledge was assessed 14 days post-instruction.

Results. Experts rated the MAPS Model highly for utility, feasibility, appropriateness, and accuracy. After implementation, students' DTS significantly exceeded the set threshold (70%), with statistical significance at the .01 level. Additionally, students demonstrated significantly higher AA post-instruction than pre-instruction levels, at the .01 significance level. Retention analysis revealed no significant decline in DTS or AA 14 days after program completion.

Conclusion. The MAPS Model effectively integrates innovative pedagogical strategies to enhance DTS and AA in community college settings. Its structured, adaptable framework addresses diverse learner needs, ensuring immediate and sustained educational benefits.

Keywords: adaptive learning, community college, digital literacy, mastery learning, microlearning, problem-based learning, Thailand

References

Archambault, L., Leary, H., & Rice, K. (2022). Pillars of online pedagogy: a framework for teaching in online learning environments. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 178-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2051513

Akpan, B. (2020). Mastery learning—Benjamin Bloom. In B. Akpan & T. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Science education in theory and practice (pp. 149-162). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_11

Bergmann, J. (2022). Mastery Learning, Flipped. Educational Leadership, 80(3), 46-51.

Bojović, Ž., Bojović, P. D., Vujošević, D., & Šuh, J. (2020). Education in times of crisis: rapid transition to distance learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(6), 1467-1489. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22318

Chandra, A., Stewart, C. M., & Meyer, C. (2024). An eclectic problem-based learning model in an entrepreneurship capstone course. The International Journal of Management Education, 22(3), 101034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101034

Choo, C. Y., & Rahim, A. S. A. (2021). Pharmacy students' perceptions and performance from a microlearning-based virtual practical on the elucidation of absolute configuration of drugs. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(4), 1–10. https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/AJUE/article/download/16187/8410/

Clark, D., & Talbert, R. (2023). Grading for growth: A guide to alternative grading practices that

promote authentic learning and student engagement in higher education. Taylor & Francis. https://tinyurl.com/2eubh6r4

Community College Institute. (2024). Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation. Thailand. https://www.iccs.ac.th/

Cundiff, P. R., McLaughlin, O., Brown, K., & Grace, K. (2020). In search of greater understanding: The impact of mastery learning on social science education. Teaching Sociology, 48(2), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X20907979

Darma, I. K. (2019). The effectiveness of the teaching program of the CIPP evaluation model. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT and Scientific Research, 5(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v5n3.619

Dunlea, J. (2015). Validating a set of Japanese EFL proficiency tests: demonstrating locally designed tests meet international standards. (PhD thesis -University of Bedfordshire) United Kingdom. https://uobrep.openrepository.com/handle/10547/618581

Dwinggo Samala, A., Bojić, L., Bekiroğlu, D., Watrianthos, R., & Hendriyani, Y. (2023). Microlearning: Transforming education with bite-sized learning on the go—insights and applications. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 17(21), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i21.42951

Eau, G., Hoodin, D., & Musaddiq, T. (2022). Testing the effects of adaptive learning courseware on student performance: An experimental approach. Southern Economic Journal, 88(3), 1086–1118. https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12547

Fidan, M., & Tuncel, M. (2019). Integrating augmented reality into problem-based learning: The effects on academic achievement and attitude in physics education. Computers & Education, 142, 103635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103635

Gligorea, I., Cioca, M., Oancea, R., Gorski, A. T., Gorski, H., & Tudorache, P. (2023). Adaptive learning using artificial intelligence in e-learning: a literature review. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121216

Hamed, M. H., Atena, E., & Milad, H. H. (2020). Flipping microlearning-based EFL classroom to enhance learners’ self-regulation. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 20, 43-59.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Kapur, M., & Hamstra, M. (2018). Learning through problem-solving. In International Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 210-220). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315617572

Holland, J. G. (1977). Variables in adaptive decisions in individualized instruction. Educational Psychologist, 12(2), 146-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461527709529170

Holmes, A. G., Polman Tuin, M., & Turner, S. L. (2021). Competence and competency in higher education, simple terms yet with complex meanings: Theoretical and practical issues for university teachers and assessors implementing Competency-Based Education (CBE). Educational Process International Journal, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2021.103.3

Hug, T. (2021). Sound pedagogy practices for designing and implementing microlearning objects. In Microlearning in the Digital Age (pp. 33-57). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367821623

Ipinnaiye, O., & Risquez, A. (2024). Exploring adaptive learning, learner-content interaction, and student performance in undergraduate economics classes. Computers & education, 215, 105047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105047

Jing, Y., Zhao, L., Zhu, K., Wang, H., Wang, C., & Xia, Q. (2023). Research landscape of adaptive learning in education: A bibliometric study on research publications from 2000 to 2022. Sustainability, 15(4), 3115. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043115

Kiettikunwong, N., & Narot, P. (2024). Concept of program evaluation. In Determining outcomes and impacts of human resource development programs (pp. 35-51). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0395-1_4

Leong, K., Sung, A., Au, D., & Blanchard, C. (2021). A review of the trend of microlearning. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 13(1), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-10-2020-0044

Maqsood, A., Abbas, J., Rehman, G., & Mubeen, R. (2021). The paradigm shift for educational system continuance in the advent of COVID-19 pandemic: mental health challenges and reflections. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences, 2, 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2020.100011

Mohammed, G. S., Wakil, K., & Nawroly, S. S. (2018). The effectiveness of microlearning to improve students' learning ability. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(3), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.415824

Morgan, A., Sibson, R., & Jackson, D. (2022). Digital demand and digital deficit: conceptualising digital literacy and gauging proficiency among higher education students. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 44(3), 258-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2022.2030275

Nantha, C., Siripongdee, K., Siripongdee, S., Pimdee, P., Kantathanawat, T., & Boonsomchuae, K. (2024). Enhancing ICT literacy and achievement: A TPACK-based blended learning model for Thai business administration students. Education Sciences, 14(5), 455. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050455

Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2018). Mobile-based microlearning and assessment: impact on learning performance and motivation of high school students. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 34(3), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12240

Noor, S., & Isa, F. M. (2023). Online learning challenges faced by SSC-level learners during the COVID-19 pandemic: a case of Pakistan. Educational Process: International Journal, 12(4), 65-77.– https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2023.124.4

Normadhi, N. B. A., Shuib, L., Nasir, H. N. M., Bimba, A., Idris, N., & Balakrishnan, V. (2019). Identification of personal traits in adaptive learning environment: systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 130, 168–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.005

Paiboonsin, N., & Sopeerak, S. (2016). Web-based instruction development by integrated collaborative learning and problem-based learning for undergraduate students. Technical Education Journal King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, 7(2), 91-101.

Park, Y., & Kim, Y. (2018). A design and development of micro-learning content in e-learning system. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 8(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.8.1.2698

Park, O. C., & Lee, J. (2013). Adaptive instructional systems. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 647-680). Routledge.

Parker, D. A., & Roumell, E. A. (2020). A functional contextualist approach to mastery learning in vocational education and training. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1479. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01479

Pimdee, P., Sukkamart, A., Nantha, C., Kantathanawat, T., & Leekitchwatana, P. (2024). Enhancing Thai student-teacher problem-solving skills and academic achievement through a blended problem-based learning approach in online flipped classrooms. Heliyon, 10(7), e29172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29172

Rahman, Z., Mattingly, S. P., Casey, C., & Madanu, S. K. (2019). Mastery-level achievement method for assessing module-based educational tools. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 145(4), 04019010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000417

Riel, J., Christian, S., & Hinson, B. (2012). Charting digital literacy: A framework for information technology and digital skills education in the community college. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2781161

Rodriguez, M., & Liu, L. (2023). A Case Study of the Caregiver Digital Literacy Self-Efficacy During Distance Learning. Journal of School Administration Research and Development, 8(2), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.32674/jsard.v8i2.5815

Rooholamini, A., Amini, M., Bazrafkan, L., Dehghani, M. R., Esmaeilzadeh, Z., Nabeiei, P., Rezaee, R., & Kojuri, J. (2017). Program evaluation of an integrated basic science medical curriculum in Shiraz Medical School, using CIPP evaluation model. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 5(3), 148. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5522906/

Rukspollmuang, C., & Fry, G. W. (2022). Overview of education in Thailand. In Symaco, L.P., Hayden, M. (Eds.), International handbook on education in Southeast Asia. Springer international handbooks of education (pp. 1-31). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8136-3_24-1

Saechan, T., & Morsorn, T. (2016). Digital literacy: definition, component, and current situation. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 116-145.

Santhuenkaew, T., Jaikaew, S., & Athikiat, K. (2024). Information technology for school guida. RICE Journal of Creative Entrepreneurship and Management, 5(1), 74-82. https://doi.org/10.14456/rice.v5i1.85

Seters, J. R., Ossevoort, M. A., Tramper, J., & Goedhart, M. J. (2012). The influence of student characteristics on the use of adaptive e-learning material. Computers & Education, 58(3), 942–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.002

Scott, S. I., Dalsgaard, T., Jepsen, J. V., von Buchwald, C., & Andersen, S. A. W. (2020). Design and validation of a cross‐specialty simulation‐based training course in basic robotic surgical skills. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer-Assisted Surgery, 16(5), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2138

Shail, M. S. (2019). Using micro-learning on mobile applications to increase knowledge retention and work performance: A review of literature. Cureus, 11(8), e5307. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5307

Siripipatthanakul, S., Kaewpuang, P., Sitthipon, T., & Sriboonruang, P. (2022). a review of educational adaptation during the COVID-19 pandemic via online learning. International Journal of Computing Sciences Research, 6(1), 1-17.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2015). CIPP evaluation model checklist: a tool for applying the CIPP model to assess projects and programs. Western Michigan University Evaluation Center.

Temel, S. (2014). The effects of problem-based learning on pre-service teachers' critical thinking dispositions and perceptions of problem-solving ability. South African Journal of Education, 34(1), 1–20. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC148686

Tomlinson, C. A., & Jarvis, J. M. (2023). Differentiation: making curriculum work for all students through responsive planning & instruction. In Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 599-628). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003419426

Ussarn, A., Pimdee, P., & Thanawat, T. K. (2021). Mastery micro-adaptive instruction model with problem-based learning to enhance digital technology skills for community college students. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 5443-5449.

Wannapiroon, N., & Pimdee, P. (2022). Thai undergraduate science, technology, engineering, arts, and math (STEAM) creative thinking and innovation skill development: A conceptual model using a digital virtual classroom learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 5689–5716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10849-w

Wayo, W., Charoennukul, A., Kankaynat, C., & Konyai, J. (2020). Online Learning Under the COVID-19 Epidemic: Concepts and applications of teaching and learning management. Regional Health Promotion Center, 9, 285-298.

Wilson, L. O. (2016). Anderson and Krathwohl Bloom’s Taxonomy revised: understanding the new version of bloom’s Taxonomy. https://tinyurl.com/4r95smkz

Winget, M., & Persky, A. M. (2022). A practical review of mastery learning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 86(10), ajpe8906. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8906

Xie, X., Siau, K., & Nah, F. F. H. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic–online education in the new normal and the next normal. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 22(3), 175-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2020.1824884

Xiong, Y., Ling, Q., & Li, X. (2021). Ubiquitous e‐Teaching and e‐Learning: China’s Massive Adoption of Online Education and Launching MOOCs Internationally during the COVID‐19 Outbreak. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 1, 6358976. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6358976

Yang, C., Luo, L., Vadillo, M. A., Yu, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2021). Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Psychological bulletin, 147(4), 399. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/bul0000309

Yarbrough, D. B., Shulha, L. M., Hopson, R. K., & Caruthers, F. A. (2010). The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users (3rd. Ed.). Sage. http://tinyurl.com/39txh4v6

Yemi, T. M. (2018). Mastery learning approach (MLA): its effects on the students' mathematics academic achievement. European Journal of Alternative Education Studies. https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejae/article/view/1584

Announcement

EDUPIJ Citation Metrics

EDUPIJ News!

► Educational Process International Journal has changed to publish in article number order instead of in page range order beginning with Volume 14 (2025).