Volume 14 (2025) Download Cover Page

How do Gen Z Teachers Develop Their Intrapersonal Skills? Evidence from Indonesia

Article Number: e2025016  |  Published Online: January 2025  |  DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.14.16

Suyatno Suyatno , Dholina Inang Pambudi , Wantini Wantini , Didit Haryadi , Hendra Hendra , Rohmatus Naini

Abstract

Background/purpose.   Generation Z (Gen Z) teachers often face problems related to low intrapersonal skills in the workplace. Although empirical evidence shows how important intrapersonal skills are in supporting Gen Z teachers, there is still limited research on the intrapersonal problems faced by these teachers. Therefore, this research aimed to explore the intrapersonal skill problems often faced by Gen Z teachers as well as ways to solve these problems.  

Materials/methods. Adopting a qualitative research method, a Focus Group Discussion (FGD) was conducted to explore the experiences and views of Gen Z teachers regarding intrapersonal skills. Data were collected from 50 teachers from Bima City and Regency, West Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia, between the ages of 23 and 28. The data were analyzed using thematic data analysis.

Results. The results showed that Gen Z teachers often face problems such as work pressure, emotional regulation, and negative self-image. Strategies adopted for improving intrapersonal skills included mindfulness, self-reflection, seeking feedback, and maintaining a balance in life.

Conclusion.  This research evaluated the problems faced by Gen Z teachers and appropriate strategies developed to solve them, which indicated the importance of emotional support and intrapersonal skills. Therefore, schools need to provide spaces and training that support the development of these skills so that teachers can be more effective in facing challenges and improving professionalism. The findings offer a strong framework for developing more comprehensive teacher training programs, which focus not only on technical skills but also on developing intrapersonal skills crucial in enhancing learning. 

Keywords: Gen Z teachers, intrapersonal skills, mindfulness, self-reflection, balance in life

References

Al-Adwan, A. S., & Al-Debei, M. M. (2024). The determinants of Gen Z’s metaverse adoption decisions in higher education: integrating UTAUT2 with personal innovativeness in IT. Education and Information Technologies, 29(6), 7413–7445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12080-1

Barhate, B., & Dirani, K. M. (2022). Career aspirations of generation Z: a systematic literature review. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(1–2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejtd-07-2020-0124

Bauml, M., Patton, M. M., & Rhea, D. (2020). A qualitative study of teachers’ perceptions of increased recess time on teaching, learning, and behavior. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 34(4), 506–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2020.1718808

Bier, M. C., Sherblom, S. A., Berkowitz, M. W., & Sterling, E. (2021). How a servant leader’s ethos of service and stewardship can support teachers’ professional ethos in twenty-first century schools. In The International Handbook of Teacher Ethos: Strengthening Teachers, Supporting Learners (pp. 393–412). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73644-6_23

Braun, V., Clarke, V., Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2017). Applied qualitative research in psychology. Applied Qualitative Research in Psychology, 0887(2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-35913-1

Brundiers, K., Barth, M., Cebrián, G., Cohen, M., Diaz, L., Doucette-Remington, S., Dripps, W., Habron, G., Harré, N., & Jarchow, M. (2021). Key competencies in sustainability in higher education—toward an agreed-upon reference framework. Sustainability Science, 16, 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00838-2

Cheng, X., Zhang, H., Cao, J., & Ma, Y. (2022). The effect of mindfulness-based programs on psychological distress and burnout in kindergarten teachers: A pilot study. Early Childhood Education Journal, 50(7), 1197–1207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01254-6

Chou, C. Y., & Zou, N. B. (2020). An analysis of internal and external feedback in self-regulated learning activities mediated by self-regulated learning tools and open learner models. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00233-y

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: a practical guide. Thematic Analysis, 1–100. https://doi.org/https://www.torrossa.com/it/resources/an/5282292

Cooper, R., & Fleisher, A. (2012). Building connections : an interpretative phenomenological analysis of qualitative research students ’ learning experiences. The Qualitative Report, 17(17), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ974974

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

de Carvalho, J. S., Oliveira, S., Roberto, M. S., Gonçalves, C., Bárbara, J. M., de Castro, A. F., Pereira, R., Franco, M., Cadima, J., Leal, T., Lemos, M. S., & Marques-Pinto, A. (2021). Effects of a mindfulness-based intervention for teachers: a study on teacher and student outcomes. Mindfulness, 12(7), 1719–1732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-021-01635-3

Demirbilek, M., & Keser, S. (2022). Leadership expectations of Generation Z teachers working in educational organizations. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 7(1), 209–245. https://doi.org/https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/real/issue/69243/1021310

Djafarova, E., & Bowes, T. (2021). ‘Instagram made me buy it’: Generation Z impulse purchases in fashion industry. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102345

Dye, L., Burke, M. G., & Wolf, C. (2020). Teaching mindfulness for the self-care and well-being of counselors-in-training. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 15(2), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2019.1642171

Fűzi, B., Fischer, A., Simon, G., & Majzik-Lichtenberger, K. (2024). Establishing a dynamic-transitional model of personal support in mentoring. Educational Process: International Journal, 13(4), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2024.134.4

Gnepp, J., Klayman, J., Williamson, I. O., & Barlas, S. (2020). The future of feedback: Motivating performance improvement through future-focused feedback. PLoS ONE, 15(6), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234444

Gonzales, M. (2022). Emotional Intelligence for students, parents, teachers and school leaders. A Handbook for the Whole School Community. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0324-3

Harari, T. T., Sela, Y., & Bareket-Bojmel, L. (2023). Gen Z during the COVID-19 crisis: a comparative analysis of the differences between Gen Z and Gen X in resilience, values and attitudes. In Current Psychology (Vol. 42, Issue 28, pp. 24223–24232). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03501-4

Hossain, M. I., Tabash, M. I., Siow, M. L., Ong, T. S., & Anagreh, S. (2023). Entrepreneurial intentions of Gen Z university students and entrepreneurial constraints in Bangladesh. In Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship (Vol. 12, Issue 1). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00279-y

Katz, D. (2019). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. American Psychologist, 20(9), 714–715. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021466

Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Sage Publications, Inc.

London, M., Sessa, V. I., & Shelley, L. A. (2023). Developing self-awareness: learning processes for self- and interpersonal growth. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-044531

Ludwig, C. M., Geisler, A. N., Fernandez, J. M., Battaglia, G., Andorfer, C., & Hinshaw, M. A. (2020). The challenge of change: resilience traits in Women’s Dermatological Society Forum participants by generation. International Journal of Women’s Dermatology, 6(4), 277–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijwd.2020.06.005

Lyndgaard, S. F., & Kanfer, R. (2024). Interpersonal, intrapersonal, and cognitive tactics: A thematic analysis of adults’ 21st century learning management. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 33(1), 175–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2024.2303777

Magano, J., Silva, C., Figueiredo, C., Vitória, A., Nogueira, T., & Dinis, M. A. P. (2020). Generation Z: Fitting project management soft skills competencies—a mixed-method approach. Education Sciences, 10(7), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10070187

Maloni, M., Hiatt, M. S., & Campbell, S. (2019). Understanding the work values of Gen Z business students. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(3), 100320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100320

Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2022). The burnout challenge: managing people’s relationships with their jobs. Harvard University Press.

Mihelič, K. K., Lim, V. K. G., & Culiberg, B. (2023). Cyberloafing among Gen Z students: the role of norms, moral disengagement, multitasking self-efficacy, and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38(2), 567–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00617-w

Parker, K., & Igielnik, R. (2020). On the cusp of adulthood and facing an uncertain future: What we know about Gen Z so far.

Pellegrino, J. W. (2017). Teaching, learning and assessing 21st century skills (2017). Educational Research and Innovation, 223-251. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264270695-12-en

Perilus, B. (2020). Engaging four generations in the workplace: a single case study. University of Phoenix.

Rachmawati, Y., & Suyatno, S. (2021). The effect of principals’ competencies on teachers’ job satisfaction and work commitment. Participatory Educational Research, 8(1), 362–378. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.21.8.1

Rahmawati, R., Rizal, Y., & Nurdin, N. (2024). The meaning of being a teacher in the generation of Gen Z in the phenomenological approach. Economic Education and Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(1), 72-77. https://doi.org/10.23960/e3j/v7i1.72-77

Redman, A., & Wiek, A. (2021). Competencies for advancing transformations towards sustainability. Frontiers in Education, 6, 785163. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.785163

Schroth, H. (2019). Are you ready for gen Z in the workplace? California Management Review, 61(3), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619841006

Sherman, U. P., & Morley, M. J. (2015). On the formation of the psychological contract: a schema theory perspective. Group and Organization Management, 40(2), 160–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115574944

Shorey, S., Chan, V., Rajendran, P., & Ang, E. (2021). Learning styles, preferences and needs of generation Z healthcare students: Scoping review. Nurse Education in Practice, 57, 103247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103247

Siagian, N. R., & Yuliana, N. (2023). The role of social media in Generation Z communication. Interdisciplinary Journal of Advanced Research and Innovation, 1(3), 109–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58860/ijari.v1i3.27

Solaja, O. M., & Ogunola, A. A. (2016). Leadership style and multigenerational workforce: a call for workplace agility in Nigerian public organizations. International Journal of African and Asian Studies Www.Iiste.Org ISSN 2409-6938, 21(January 2016), 46–56. www.iiste.org

Suyatno, S., Hasanah, E., Wantini, W., Pambudi, D. I., & Supardi, S. (2021). Meaning in work of Indonesian teachers: A phenomenological research. Qualitative Report, 26(10), 3189–3213. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4970

Suyatno, S., Pambudi, D. I., Mardati, A., Wantini, W., Nuraini, E., & Yoyo, Y. (2019). The education values of Indonesian teachers: origin, importance, and its impact on their teaching. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 633–650. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12338a

Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021). Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technology in Society, 65, 101565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565

Walinski, C. J., Ontiveros, J. C., Liu, F., Crain, G., & Vardar‐Sengul, S. (2023). Optimizing teaching effectiveness in dental education for a new generation of learners. Journal of Dental Education, 87(2), 182–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13108

Yeap, S. B., & Thien, L. M. (2021). Enhancing commitment to teaching entrepreneurship through mindfulness and readiness for change in higher education institutions. Educational Process: International Journal, 10(4), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2021.104.3

Announcement

EDUPIJ Citation Metrics

EDUPIJ News!

► Educational Process International Journal has changed to publish in article number order instead of in page range order beginning with Volume 14 (2025).