Volume 15 (2025) Download Cover Page

Enhancing Critical and Creative Thinking Capabilities in Pre-service Teacher Education: Digital Integration and Pedagogical Innovation in Thailand’s Next Normal Era

Article Number: e2025103  |  Available Online: March 2025  |  DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.15.103

Pornpisut Duangngern , Wanwisa Wannapipat , Sanit Srikoon , Parama Kwangmuang

Abstract

Background/purpose. The ongoing digital transformation in education has identified important areas for development in pre-service teachers' preparation to facilitate critical and creative thinking within technology-enhanced learning environments. This study investigated the readiness and implementation of creative and critical thinking skills among pre-service teachers in Thailand during the Next Normal era.

Materials/methods. The study employed a comprehensive mixed-methods sequential explanatory design, gathering data from 85 pre-service teachers and 11 faculty members across multiple higher education institutions. Quantitative data were collected through surveys and assessments, while qualitative insights were obtained through 20 in-depth interviews and four focus group discussions.

Results. The findings revealed that data analysis had emerged as the most potent capability with a strong correlation to digital tool proficiency. Project-based learning demonstrated the highest effectiveness rating, though significant implementation challenges were identified. Notable disparities in technological readiness between urban and rural settings highlighted infrastructure challenges.

Conclusion. Successful development of critical and creative thinking capabilities requires a balanced approach combining structured support systems, innovative pedagogical strategies, and technological infrastructure, while addressing the specific needs and constraints of different educational contexts. The study contributes to understanding how institutional support, pedagogical approaches, and technological integration influence the development of essential cognitive skills in teacher education.

Keywords: Critical-creative thinking capabilities, pre-service teacher education, digital integration, pedagogical innovation, next normal era

References

 Abuhassna, H., & Alnawajha, S. (2023). Instructional Design Made Easy! Instructional design models, categories, frameworks, educational context, and recommendations for future work. European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education, 13(4), 715–735. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13040054

Babenko, О. (2020). Implementation of information technologies to develop students’ creative and critical thinking in ESL classes. Young Scientist, 12 (88), 348–351. https://doi.org/10.32839/2304-5809/2020-12-88-67

Boer, P. J., & Asino, T. I. (2022). Learning design experiences of the Namibian teachers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: an Ethnographic perspective. TechTrends, 66(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00684-8

Bosch, N. (2022). Design of the participatory learning experience. In Proceedings of the 2022 Interaction Design and Children Conference (pp. 452–457). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3501712.3535298

Carvalho, L., Castañeda, L., & Yeoman, P. (2023). The “Birth of Doubt” and “The Existence of Other Possibilities”: Exploring how the ACAD toolkit supports design for learning. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(2), 340–359. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.7.1494

Chan, C. K. Y., Tsi, L. H., & Yeung, N. C. J. (2022). An adapted 3P (precursor-process-product) framework for the development of holistic competencies – “Approach to develop” in out of classroom learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 75, 101205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101205

Chen, W., Pi, Z., Tan, J. S. H., & Lyu, Q. (2022). Preparing pre-service teachers for instructional innovation with ICT via co-design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7743

Dai, C., Ke, F., Dai, Z., & Pachman, M. (2022). Improving teaching practices via virtual reality‐supported simulation‐based learning: Scenario design and the duration of implementation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(4), 836–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13296

Dignath, C. (2021). For unto every one that hath shall be given: teachers’ competence profiles regarding the promotion of self-regulated learning moderate the effectiveness of short-term teacher training. Metacognition and Learning, 16(3), 555–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09271-x

Fang, J., Chang, S., Hwang, G., & Yang, G. (2021). An online collaborative peer-assessment approach to strengthening pre-service teachers’ digital content development competence and higher-order thinking tendency. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 1155–1181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09990-7

Hamid, A., Saputro, S., Ashadi, N., & Masykuri, M. (2021). Analysis of critical-creative thinking styles and their implications on self efficacy teacher pree service. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1760(1), 012033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1760/1/012033

Huang, J., & Sang, G. (2023). Conceptualising critical thinking and its research in teacher education: A systematic review. Teachers and Teaching, 29(6), 638–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2023.2212364

Jajoo, A., & Deshmukh, P. (2024). Exploring competency: Corporate framework, learning theories, and a cognitive development model. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(8), 2024170. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024170

Kao, Y., Chen, H., & Lo, J. (2023). Exploring an interdisciplinary curriculum in product and media Design Education: knowledge innovation and competency development. Sustainability, 15(23), 16369. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316369

Kim, M. S. (2021). Factors to assess teacher design knowledge competencies: data literacies practice, design practice, and distributed epistemic practice (3Ds). International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(4), 2173–2193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09683-5

Kyza, E. A., & Agesilaou, A. (2022). Investigating the processes of teacher and researcher empowerment and learning in co-design settings. Cognition and Instruction, 40(1), 100–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2021.2010213

Lin, W., Zaman, S. I., Jamil, S., & Khan, S. A. (2023). Students engagement in distant learning: How much influence do the critical factors have for success in academic performance? Psychology in the Schools, 60(7), 2373–2394. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22858

Lombard, F., Schneider, D. K., Merminod, M., & Weiss, L. (2020). Balancing emotion and reason to develop critical thinking about popularized neurosciences. Science & Education, 29(5), 1139–1176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00154-2

Lu, K., Yang, H. H., Shi, Y., & Wang, X. (2021). Examining the key influencing factors on college students’ higher-order thinking skills in the smart classroom environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00238-7

Ma, N., Li, Y., Guo, J., Laurillard, D., & Yang, M. (2022). A learning model for improving in-service teachers’ course completion in MOOCs. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5940–5955. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2025405

McBride, C., Smith, A., & Kalir, J. H. (2023). Tinkering toward teacher learning: a case for critical playful literacies in teacher education. English Teaching Practice & Critique, 22(2), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-08-2022-0114

Minaflinou, E. B. (2019). Promoting critical thinking skills in EFL university students in Benin. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 8(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.23.2019.81.1.13

Naidoo, J., Pillay, D., & Naicker, I. (2023). Together a catalyst: learning from our Co-Creative Arts-Based inquiry about our teacher selves during the transition to online teaching. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231180167

Nilsson, P., & Lund, J. (2022). Design for learning – involving teachers in digital didactic design (D3). Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 20(1), 142–159. https://doi.org/10.1108/itse-08-2021-0143

Núñez-Canal, M., De Las Mercedes De Obesso, M., & Pérez-Rivero, C. A. (2021). New challenges in higher education: A study of the digital competence of educators in Covid times. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121270

Olney, T., Rienties, B., Chang, D., & Banks, D. (2023). The Learning Design & Course Creation Workshop: Impact of a Professional Development Model for Training Designers and Creators of Online and Distance Learning. Technology Knowledge and Learning, 29(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09639-1

Parkhouse, H., Senechal, J., & Severson-Irby, E. (2023). Laying a foundation for critical professional development through a research-practice partnership. Professional Development in Education, 49(4), 725–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2023.2193198

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2019). Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Professional and Personal Life. Foundation for Critical Thinking.

Pérez-Garcias, A., Tur, G., Moral, S. V., & Darder-Mesquida, A. (2022). Flexible learning itineraries in digital environments for personalised learning in teacher training. RIED Revista Iberoamericana De Educación a Distancia, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.2.32326

Phodong, A., & Jarujit, N. (2022). The model development competency learning designers to teacher by integrating active learning. Journal of Buddhist Anthropology, 7(8), 373–388. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JSBA/article/view/258831

Ryan, M., Weber, L., Barton, G., & Dutton, J. (2022). Exploring the impact of a reflexive, co-designed program of professional learning for the teaching of writing in elementary school classrooms. Literacy Research and Instruction, 62(4), 371–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2022.2130115

Schwittay, A. (2023). Teaching critical hope with creative pedagogies of possibilities. Pedagogy Culture and Society, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2187439

Shieh, J., Reynolds, B. L., & Van Ha, X. (2023). Using a design‐based approach to develop a checklist for evaluating pre-service teacher learning materials. TESOL Journal, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.717

Silva, H., Lopes, J., Cruz, G., Dominguez, C., & Morais, E. (2022). Does university attendance affect students’ critical and creative thinking skills? A Longitudinal research with pre-service teaching and psychology undergraduates. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(2), 442–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2057448

Sudhindra, S. T., He, Y., Blessing, L., & Khan, S. A. (2022). Stories of Design Education: An Analysis of Practices and Competencies. Proceedings of the Design Society, 2, 2403–2412. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.243

Thorsten, A., & Tväråna, M. (2023). Focal points for teaching the notion of critical aspects. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 68(6), 1247–1260. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2023.2228817 

Trang, N. M. (2020). Designing a rhizomatic online personal learning environment model to improve university students’ academic listening skills. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 9(4), 286–304. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.23.2020.94.286.304

Tuan, L. K. (2022). Exploiting influential factors in teaching oriented towards the development of learners’ capacity. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 21(11), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.11.10

Wasson, B., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020). Learning Design: European Approaches. TechTrends, 64(6), 815–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00498-0

Wong, E., Kwong, T., & Chan, C. (2021). Blended Learning approach to enhance reflective higher-order cognitive thinking skills in students. In Creativity in the twenty-first century (pp. 121–132). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72216-6_8

Wong, J. T., & Hughes, B. S. (2022). Leveraging learning experience design: digital media approaches to influence motivational traits that support student learning behaviors in undergraduate online courses. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 35(3), 595–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09342-1

Wu, B., Peng, X., & Hu, Y. (2021). How to foster pre-service teachers’ STEM learning design expertise through virtual internship: a design-based research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(6), 3307–3329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10063-y

Xie, Q. (2021). Developing pre-service English teachers’ assessment literacy through design-based research. Journal of Education for Teaching International Research and Pedagogy, 47(3), 460–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1906155

Zalavra, E., Papanikolaou, K., Dimitriadis, Y., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2022). Representing learning designs in a design support tool. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 6563–6594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11441-6

Announcement

EDUPIJ Citation Metrics

EDUPIJ News!

ANNOUNCEMENT

Message from the Editor-in-Chief,

We would like to inform our authors, reviewers, and stakeholders that EDUPIJ has entered Scopus’s re-evaluation process, as officially communicated (dated 2025-12-09). This assessment is a standard quality assurance practice applied to indexed journals and aims to ensure sustained editorial quality, ethical integrity, and alignment with Scopus’s evolving evaluation framework.

EDUPIJ welcomes this process and views it as an opportunity to further consolidate its editorial governance, strengthen publication ethics, and enhance peer-review rigor.

Strengthening Editorial and Ethical Standards

To ensure full compliance with international best practices and to proactively address Scopus evaluation criteria, the following measures have been formally implemented:

1. Selective Acceptance Policy for 2026 and Beyond

In response to increased submission volume in 2025 (see Journal Metrics: https://edupij.com/index/sayfa/18/journal-metrics), EDUPIJ will adopt a more selective acceptance policy starting in 2026 and continuing in the years ahead. In doing so, the geographic distribution of authors will also be taken into account to ensure that editorial decisions are informed by transparent, year-to-year submission and authorship patterns. Acceptance rates will be carefully aligned with editorial capacity to ensure a rigorous double-blind peer review process supported by active reviewer engagement and uncompromised editorial oversight. This policy reflects our commitment to quality-driven growth rather than volume-based expansion, and it directly addresses observations that the geographic spread of authors has changed significantly during the same period by ensuring that any such shifts are systematically monitored and considered within our quality assurance framework.

In line with this approach, we have adopted a Publication Volume Policy, enacted on 2025-12-07, which establishes clear upper limits on annual publication volume and defines a framework for maintaining EDUPIJ’s output at sustainable, long-term levels, comparable to pre-2025 volumes under normal conditions. This policy is also publicly available at https://edupij.com/index/sayfa/41/publication-volume-journal-metrics-policy.

From 2026 onwards, our objective is to maintain a moderate and stable annual volume, prioritising quality and selectivity rather than growth.

2. Enhanced Author and Manuscript Integrity Screening

All submissions now undergo mandatory integrity checks, including automated screening for retraction history and potential ethical risks prior to peer review. These procedures are designed to safeguard originality, research integrity, and transparency at every stage of the editorial process.

3. Establishment of a Publication Ethics Review Committee

A dedicated Publication Ethics Review Committee has been constituted to evaluate high-risk submissions, oversee ethical investigations when necessary, and ensure consistent adherence to COPE guidelines and internationally recognized publishing standards. All ethical decisions are documented and managed through a structured, transparent process.

Ongoing Commitment:

EDUPIJ remains firmly committed to rigorous double-blind peer review, transparent editorial policies, responsible scholarly communication, and the advancement of high-quality educational research at an international level.

Our journal continues to demonstrate steady progress in terms of international visibility, indexing coverage, and citation performance. We are confident that the Scopus re-evaluation process will further support the journal’s long-term sustainability and academic impact.

We sincerely thank our authors, reviewers, and the broader scholarly community for their continued trust and contribution to EDUPIJ.

Sincerely,
Prof. Turgut Karaköse, Editor-in-Chief

 

Posted: 2025-12-09