Volume 15 (2025) Download Cover Page

Writing Anxiety Coping Strategies Among Arabic Language Students at Islamic Universities in Indonesia

Article Number: e2025125  |  Available Online: March 2025  |  DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.15.125

Mohammed Ali Al-Khawaldeh , Nasih Burhani

Abstract

Objectives. This study examined writing anxiety coping strategies among Arabic language students at Islamic universities in Indonesia and explored differences based on gender, academic level, and specialization.

Method. This study employed a descriptive research design, and data were gathered from 1,101 students using a validated Writing Anxiety Coping Strategies Scale.

Results. The results showed that positive thinking was the most frequently used strategy, while preparation, peer seeking, and relaxation were moderately used. Resignation (avoidance behavior) was the least used strategy. Significant differences were found based on gender and academic level, but not specialization. Female students used relaxation and positive thinking more, while male students showed higher resignation. Senior students exhibited greater resignation tendencies than junior students.

Conclusion. The study highlights the need for effective interventions to help students manage writing anxiety, emphasizing structured preparation, peer support, and relaxation techniques.

Keywords: Writing anxiety, coping strategies, Arabic language students, Islamic universities

References

Abd Al-Tawab, S. (2019). Trends in research on teaching Arabic writing to non-native speakers. Journal of the Faculty of Arts, Beni Suef University, 51, 391–452.

Abu Ghazal, M., Hayajneh, W., & Khudair, R. (2019). Writing anxiety among adolescents and its relationship with metacognitive writing strategies and writing self-efficacy. Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences, 20(10), 59–94. https://doi.org/:10.12785/jeps/200302

Afdalia, T., Mirza, A., & Widiastuty, H. (2023). An analysing of student’s writing anxiety and strategies used in writing English journal article. Journal of English Language Teaching and Literature, 4(2), 55-67. https://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/ELTL.

Aidit, N., Fauzi, S., & Perry, J. (2023). Investigation of second language writing anxiety among ESL students in Public University. International Journal of Service Management and Sustainability, 8(1), 73-92. https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/76477

Al Khawaldeh, M., & Yang, F. (2023). The attitudes of Chinese students in Jordan toward learning Arabic language. Mu'tah Journal for Humanities and Social Sciences, 37(7), 467–504. https://ejournal.mutah.edu.jo/index.php/hsss/article/view/1806

Al-Alwan, A. (2011). Emotional intelligence and its relationship with social skills and attachment styles of university students in light of specialization and gender. Jordanian Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(2), 124–144. https://journals.yu.edu.jo/jjes/Issues/2011/Vol7No2/2.pdf

Algaragere, R., & Al-Khawaldeh, M. (2023). The effectiveness of teaching text structure on improving writing composition skills and reducing writing anxiety among seventh graders in Jordan. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13 (12), 3251-3259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1312.23

Al-Hallaq, A. (2010). A reference for teaching Arabic language skills and sciences. Modern Book Institution.

Al-Najjar, F. (2007). Technical foundations of expressive writing. Safa Publishing and Distribution.

Al-Naqah, M. (1985). Teaching Arabic to speakers of other languages: Foundations, approaches, and teaching methods. Umm Al-Qura University Publications, Saudi Arabia.

Anita, R., & Zulhermindra, Z. (2022). Investigating the levels, types, causes and coping strategies of college students’ foreign language writing anxiety. Syntax Literate, 7 (30), 3359-3365. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i3.6627

Asr, H. (1994). Modern trends in teaching Arabic at the preparatory and secondary levels. The Arab Modern Office for Printing and Publishing.

Bloom, L. (1981). Why graduate students can’t write: Implication of research on writing anxiety for graduate education. Journal of Advanced Compositions, 2(2), 103-117. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED199710

Bloom, L. (1985). Anxious wwriters in ccontext: Graduate sschool and bbeyond, in When a writer can’t write, ed M. Rose. New York: Guilford Press, 119-133.

Cheng, Y-S. (2004). A measure of second language writing anxiety: Scale development and preliminary validation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 313- 335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.07.001

Clark, D. (2005). Explorations into writing anxiety: Helping students overcome their fears and focus on learning. ISSOTL Conference, May, 8-10, Canada.

Hassan, B. (2001). The relationship of writing apprehension and self-esteem to the writing quality of EFL university students. Mansoura Faculty of Education Journal, 4, 1-39. ERIC - ED459671.

Horwitz, E., Horwitz, M., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x

Jaber, W. (2002). Teaching Arabic: Theoretical concepts and practical applications. Dar Al-Fikr for Printing, Publishing, and Distribution.

Jawhar, N. (2009). Teaching Arabic in Indonesia: Between promising developments and existing challenges. Al-Manar Journal, 1(1), 51–64.

Kondo, D. (1997). Strategies for coping with test anxiety. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 10, 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615809708249301

Kondo, D., & Ying-Ling, Y. (2004). Strategies for coping with language anxiety: The case of students of English in Japan. ELT Juornal, 58(5), 258-265. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/58.3.258

Kurniawati, A., & Eko, A. (2022). EFL thesis writing anxiety: Causes, effects, and coping strategies. English Journal of Merdeka: Cultur, Language, and Teaching of English, 7(1), 137-151. https://doi.org/10.26905/enjourme.v7i2.8004

MacIntyre, P., & Gardner, R. (1994). The subtle effects of language anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language. Language Learning, 44, 283-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01103.x

Pajares, F., & Johnson, M. (1995, April). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in the writing performance of entering high school students: A path analysis [Conference presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

Paramarti, P., Tusino, Widodo, S., & Masykuri, E. (2023). The Students’ writing anxiety at the fourth semester students in academic writing class. Education, Literature and Linguistics Journal, 8(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.52166/edulitics.v8i1.4099

Quvanch, Z., & Si Na, K. (2022). Evaluating Afganistan uuniversity students writing anxiety in English class: An empirical research. Cogen Education, 9(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2040697

Rezaei, M., & Jafari, M. (2014). Investigating the levels, types, and the cause of writing anxiety among Iranian EFL students: A mixed method design. Procedia Social and Behaviour Sciences, 98, 15-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.577

Salem, A. (2019). The effectiveness of an instructional model based on modern trends in teaching writing to develop persuasive writing skills and reduce writing anxiety among middle school students. Umm Al-Qura University Journal for Educational and Psychological Sciences, 11(1), 1–35.

Ta’ima, R. (1986). A reference for teaching Arabic to speakers of other languages. Institute of Arabic Language, Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia.

Ta’ima, R. (1989). Teaching Arabic to non-native speakers: Its curricula and methods. Islamic Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Topping, K. (2001). Paired collaborative writing. Research in Education, 67(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830120117178

Wahyuni, D., Oktavia, W., & Marlina, L. (2019). Writing anxiety among Indonesia EFL college students: Levels, cause and coping strategies. Lingua Cultura, 13(1), 67-74. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v13i1.5239

Wiltse, M. (2001). The Effects of motivation and anxiety on students’ use of instructor comments. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and mass communication, August. 5-8, 2001, Washington, DC.

Youssef, A. (2007). Constructing an educational program based on using the language Laboratory and testing its effect on the acquisition of listening and loud reading skills for basic stage students in Jordan [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Amman Arab University for Graduate Studies, Jordan.

Zargar, M., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2023). Iranian medical students’ EFL writing anxiety, coping strategies, and attitudes towards writing in an online setting. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 13, 26-49. https:// https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2023.131003

Zhang, H. (2011). A study on ESL writing anxiety among Chinese English major -causes, effects and coping strategies for ESL writing anxiety [Unpublished master thesis]. Kristiansan University of Sweden.

Announcement

EDUPIJ Citation Metrics

EDUPIJ News!

ANNOUNCEMENT

Message from the Editor-in-Chief,

We would like to inform our authors, reviewers, and stakeholders that EDUPIJ has entered Scopus’s re-evaluation process, as officially communicated (dated 2025-12-09). This assessment is a standard quality assurance practice applied to indexed journals and aims to ensure sustained editorial quality, ethical integrity, and alignment with Scopus’s evolving evaluation framework.

EDUPIJ welcomes this process and views it as an opportunity to further consolidate its editorial governance, strengthen publication ethics, and enhance peer-review rigor.

Strengthening Editorial and Ethical Standards

To ensure full compliance with international best practices and to proactively address Scopus evaluation criteria, the following measures have been formally implemented:

1. Selective Acceptance Policy for 2026 and Beyond

In response to increased submission volume in 2025 (see Journal Metrics: https://edupij.com/index/sayfa/18/journal-metrics), EDUPIJ will adopt a more selective acceptance policy starting in 2026 and continuing in the years ahead. In doing so, the geographic distribution of authors will also be taken into account to ensure that editorial decisions are informed by transparent, year-to-year submission and authorship patterns. Acceptance rates will be carefully aligned with editorial capacity to ensure a rigorous double-blind peer review process supported by active reviewer engagement and uncompromised editorial oversight. This policy reflects our commitment to quality-driven growth rather than volume-based expansion, and it directly addresses observations that the geographic spread of authors has changed significantly during the same period by ensuring that any such shifts are systematically monitored and considered within our quality assurance framework.

In line with this approach, we have adopted a Publication Volume Policy, enacted on 2025-12-07, which establishes clear upper limits on annual publication volume and defines a framework for maintaining EDUPIJ’s output at sustainable, long-term levels, comparable to pre-2025 volumes under normal conditions. This policy is also publicly available at https://edupij.com/index/sayfa/41/publication-volume-journal-metrics-policy.

From 2026 onwards, our objective is to maintain a moderate and stable annual volume, prioritising quality and selectivity rather than growth.

2. Enhanced Author and Manuscript Integrity Screening

All submissions now undergo mandatory integrity checks, including automated screening for retraction history and potential ethical risks prior to peer review. These procedures are designed to safeguard originality, research integrity, and transparency at every stage of the editorial process.

3. Establishment of a Publication Ethics Review Committee

A dedicated Publication Ethics Review Committee has been constituted to evaluate high-risk submissions, oversee ethical investigations when necessary, and ensure consistent adherence to COPE guidelines and internationally recognized publishing standards. All ethical decisions are documented and managed through a structured, transparent process.

Ongoing Commitment:

EDUPIJ remains firmly committed to rigorous double-blind peer review, transparent editorial policies, responsible scholarly communication, and the advancement of high-quality educational research at an international level.

Our journal continues to demonstrate steady progress in terms of international visibility, indexing coverage, and citation performance. We are confident that the Scopus re-evaluation process will further support the journal’s long-term sustainability and academic impact.

We sincerely thank our authors, reviewers, and the broader scholarly community for their continued trust and contribution to EDUPIJ.

Sincerely,
Prof. Turgut Karaköse, Editor-in-Chief

 

Posted: 2025-12-09