Perceived Barriers to Physical Activity in A Sample of University Students: A Descriptive Study

Edwin Gustavo Estrada-Araoz , Jhemy Quispe-Aquise , Guido Ayay-Arista , Gilber Chura-Quispe , Neil Anthony Quipo-Conde , Freddy Abel Rivera-Mamani , Maribel Mamani-Roque

Full text PDF | 2403 | 2640

Abstract

Background/purpose. Regular physical activity is important for maintaining a healthy lifestyle and preventing various chronic diseases. However, despite its well-documented benefits, many people encounter multiple barriers to participating in it. The present research aimed to analyze the perceived barriers to physical activity in a sample of Peruvian university students.

Materials/methods. To achieve this, a quantitative, non-experimental, descriptive, and cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of 239 students of both sexes, who were administered the Barriers to Being Active Quiz (BBAQ), an instrument with adequate metric properties.

Results. It was found that the mean of the perceived barriers to physical activity was 29.12 (SD = 11.517), which, when compared to the possible maximum and minimum values, was categorized at a moderate level. Additionally, the main barriers identified were lack of energy (M = 4.80, SD = 2.280), lack of resources (M = 4.54, SD = 1.985), and lack of time (M = 4.50, SD = 1.951). On the other hand, it was observed that women and people who were not employed perceived more barriers to engaging in physical activity compared to men and those who were employed, respectively.

Conclusion. It was concluded that the perceived barriers to physical activity were categorized at a moderate level, highlighting lack of energy, lack of resources, and lack of time as the main factors. Therefore, it is recommended that institutional strategies such as sports spaces, accessible programs, awareness campaigns, stress management workshops, and partnerships with sports centers be implemented to promote student well-being.

Keywords: Barriers, physical activity, exercise, university students, well-being

References

Acosta, D. M., & Corvetto, G. J. (2024). Actividad física-deportiva post pandemia en estudiantes adolescentes de una institución educativa pública-Perú. Episteme Koinonia, 7(1), 128-149. https://doi.org/10.35381/e.k.v7i1.3726

Alkhawaldeh, A., Abdalrahim, A., AlBashtawy, M., Ayed, A., Al Omari, O., AlBashtawy, S., Suliman, M., Oweidat, I. A., Khatatbeh, H., Alkhawaldeh, H., Dameery, K. A., Alsaraireh, M., & Alhroub, N. (2024). University students' physical activity: Perceived barriers and benefits to physical activity and its contributing factors. SAGE Open Nursing, 10, 23779608241240490. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608241240490

Blanco, J. R., Soto, M. C., Benitez, Z. P., Mondaca, F., & Jurado, P. J. (2019). Barreras para la práctica de ejercicio físico en universitarios mexicanos: Comparaciones por género. Retos, 36, 80-82. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v36i36.67820

Bobo, M., Saavedra, M. Á., & Montero, L. F. (2024). Análisis de las barreras percibidas para la actividad física en universitarios ecuatorianos: Comparación por sexo. Retos, 55, 857-866. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v55.105607

Brown, C. E. B., Richardson, K., Halil, B., Atkins, L., Yücel, M., & Segrave, R. A. (2024). Key influences on university students' physical activity: A systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the COM-B model of human behaviour. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 418. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17621-4

Caspersen, C. J., Powell, K. E., & Christenson, G. M. (1985). Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: Definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Reports, 100(2), 126-131.

Chen, C., Shen, Y., Zhu, Y., Xiao, F., Zhang, J., & Ni, J. (2023). The effect of academic adaptability on learning burnout among college students: The mediating effect of self-esteem and the moderating effect of self-efficacy. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 1615-1629. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S408591

Cruz, D., Ortigoza, A., & Canova, C. J. (2024). Estrés académico en los estudiantes de Enfermería. Revista Española de Educación Médica, 5(2), e598841. https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.598841

Deliens, T., Deforche, B., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., & Clarys, P. (2015). Determinants of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in university students: A qualitative study using focus group discussions. BMC Public Health, 15, 201. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1553-4

Dhuli, K., Naureen, Z., Medori, M. C., Fioretti, F., Caruso, P., Perrone, M. A., Nodari, S., Manganotti, P., Xhufi, S., Bushati, M., Bozo, D., Connelly, S. T., Herbst, K. L., & Bertelli, M. (2022). Physical activity for health. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene, 63(S3), E150-E159. https://doi.org/10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.2S3.2756

Di Liegro, C. M., Schiera, G., Proia, P., & Di Liegro, I. (2019). Physical activity and brain health. Genes, 10(9), 720. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10090720

Dodd, C., Griffin, N., Kyle, P., Scott, S., Fairbrother, H., Holding, E., Crowder, M., Woodrow, N., & Summerbell, C. (2024). Young people's experiences of physical activity insecurity: A qualitative study highlighting intersectional disadvantage in the UK. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 813. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18078-9

Duche, A., Paredes, F., Gutiérrez, O., & Carcausto, L. (2020). Transición secundaria-universidad y la adaptación a la vida universitaria. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 26(3), 244-258. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v26i3.33245

Duffey, K., Barbosa, A., Whiting, S., Mendes, R., Yordi Aguirre, I., Tcymbal, A., Abu, K., Gelius, P., & Breda, J. (2021). Barriers and facilitators of physical activity participation in adolescent girls: A systematic review of systematic reviews. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 743935. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.743935

Estrada, E. G. (2024). Burnout académico y hábitos alimentarios en estudiantes universitarios: Un estudio transversal. Gaceta Médica de Caracas, 132(3), 599-608. https://doi.org/10.47307/GMC.2024.132.3.2

Estrada, E. G., Quispe, Y. A., Noblega, H., & Malaga, Y. (2024). Autoconcepto físico y motivación hacia la práctica de actividad física en estudiantes universitarios: Un estudio transversal. Retos, 61, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v61.109580

Ferreira, R. M., Mendonça, C. R., Azevedo, V. D., Raoof, A., Noll, P. R. E. S., & Noll, M. (2022). Barriers to high school and university students' physical activity: A systematic review. PloS One, 17(4), e0265913. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265913

Franco, S. M., Vásquez, A. C., Valencia, C. L., Vidarte, J. A., & Castiblanco, H. D. (2022). Barreras para el ejercicio físico en estudiantes universitarios de Manizales, Colombia: Diferencias por programa académico. Hacia la Promoción de la Salud, 27(1), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.17151/hpsal.2022.27.1.10

García, J. R. (2020). Barreras para la práctica del ejercicio físico en estudiantes mexicanos. Sinergias Educativas, 5(2), 208-222. https://doi.org/10.37954/se.v5i2.123

Gómez, M., Granero, A., & Baena, A. (2010). Perceived barriers by university students in the practice of physical activities. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 9, 374-381.

Gravetter, F., & Wallnau, L. (2014). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences (8th ed.). Wadsworth.

Herazo, Y., Pinillos, Y., Vidarte, J., Crissien, E., Suarez, D., & García, R. (2017). Predictors of perceived barriers to physical activity in the general adult population: A cross-sectional study. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 21(1), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2016.04.003

Izquierdo, L., Hernández, M., & Urrutia, O. (2017). Barreras para la práctica de actividades físicas en estudiantes de la Escuela Latinoamericana de Medicina. Panorama. Cuba y Salud, 12(S1), 6-8. https://revpanorama.sld.cu/index.php/panorama/article/view/722

Koh, Y. S., Asharani, P. V., Devi, F., Roystonn, K., Wang, P., Vaingankar, J. A., Abdin, E., Sum, C. F., Lee, E. S., Müller, F., Chong, S. A., & Subramaniam, M. (2022). A cross-sectional study on the perceived barriers to physical activity and their associations with domain-specific physical activity and sedentary behaviour. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 1051. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13431-2

Kruszyńska, E., & Poczta, J. (2020). Difficulties limiting access to sports and recreational facilities in the city in the perceptions of service users: Sports and recreational infrastructure management policy—Poznan case study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1768. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051768

Li, J., Huang, Z., Si, W., & Shao, T. (2022). The effects of physical activity on positive emotions in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 14185. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114185

Mahindru, A., Patil, P., & Agrawal, V. (2023). Role of physical activity on mental health and well-being: A review. Cureus, 15(1), e33475. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33475

Mamani, R., Roque, E., Colque, N., & Solorzano, M. (2023). Actividad física y el deterioro cognitivo en adultos mayores. Revista Ciencias de la Actividad Física UCM, 24(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.29035/rcaf.24.1.8

Ministerio de Salud del Perú. (2023, noviembre 22). Minsa: Solo el 26% de la población peruana adulta realiza actividad física. El Peruano. https://www.elperuano.pe/noticia/206945-minsa-solo-el-26-de-la-poblacion-peruana-adulta-realiza-actividad-fisica

Paricahua, J. N., Estrada, E. G., Poma, R. S., Velasquez, L., Herrera, A. J., Cruz, G. J., Guevara, M. F., Mora, O., & Cruz, E. O. (2024). Calidad de sueño, salud mental y actividad física en estudiantes universitarios de la Amazonía peruana. Retos, 61, 59-68. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v61.109649

Paricahua, J. N., Estrada, E. G., Velasquez, L., & Herrera, A. J. (2023). Explorando las prácticas saludables: Estilos de vida entre estudiantes universitarios de la Amazonía peruana. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(4), e665. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i4.665

Peng, B., Ng, J. Y. Y., & Ha, A. S. (2023). Barriers and facilitators to physical activity for young adult women: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 20(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01411-7

Ramos, D., Rueda, D., Silvia, M. & Carvajal, L. M. (2024). El estrés enfrentado en prácticas pre profesionales por el interno rotativo de enfermería durante la pandemia. Universidad y Sociedad, 16(2), 65-74. https://rus.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/rus/article/view/4371

Reyes, D., Nazar, G., Cigarroa, I., Carrasco, F., Cárcamo, R., Rozas, K., Martorell, M., Ochoa, C., Ulloa, N., & Zapata, R. (2023). Motivación, barreras y beneficios para la práctica de ejercicio físico en una intervención Mobile Health en adultos del Biobío, Chile. Retos, 49, 623-631. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v49.97141

Rubio, F., Rubén, R., & Correa, J. E. (2015). Propiedades psicométricas de la versión al español del cuestionario "Barriers to Being Active Quiz", entre estudiantes universitarios de Colombia. Nutrición Hospitalaria, 31(4), 1708-1716. https://doi.org/10.3305/nh.2015.31.4.8404

Rubio, M. N., Córdoba, L., & Orejuela, D. F. (2023). Barreras percibidas y nivel de actividad física en universitarios colombianos durante la pandemia por COVID-19. Pensar en Movimiento: Revista de Ciencias del Ejercicio y la Salud, 21(2), e51144. https://doi.org/10.15517/pensarmov.v21i2.51144

Saqib, Z. A., Dai, J., Menhas, R., Mahmood, S., Karim, M., Sang, X., & Weng, Y. (2020). Physical activity is a medicine for non-communicable diseases: A survey study regarding the perception of physical activity impact on health wellbeing. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 13, 2949-2962. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S280339

Schuch, F. B., & Vancampfort, D. (2021). Physical activity, exercise, and mental disorders: It is time to move on. Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 43(3), 177-184. https://doi.org/10.47626/2237-6089-2021-0237

Sevil, J., Práxedes, A., Zaragoza, J., Del Villar, F., & García, L. (2017). Barreras percibidas para la práctica de actividad física en estudiantes universitarios: Diferencias por género y niveles de actividad física. Universitas Psychologica, 16(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy16-4.bppa

Silva, R. M. F., Fonseca Terra, L., Fernandes, M. d. S. V., Noll, P. R. E. S., Abreu, L. C. d., & Noll, M. (2022). Barriers to physical activity among full-time students: A case study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(19), 11896. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911896

Strain, T., Flaxman, S., Guthold, R., Semenova, E., Cowan, M., Riley, L. M., Bull, F. C., & Stevens, G. A. (2024). National, regional, and global trends in insufficient physical activity among adults from 2000 to 2022: A pooled analysis of 507 population-based surveys with 5.7 million participants. The Lancet Global Health, 12(8), e1232-e1243. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(24)00150-5

Teuber, M., Leyhr, D., & Sudeck, G. (2024). Physical activity improves stress load, recovery, and academic performance-related parameters among university students: A longitudinal study on daily level. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 598. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18082-z

Vargas, P., Rivas, L., & Carcelén, C. (2024). Nivel de actividad física y sedentarismo en adolescentes de Perú. Revista Cubana de Salud Pública, 49(3), e3887. https://revsaludpublica.sld.cu/index.php/spu/article/view/3887

Wilson, N., Cale, L., & Casey, A. (2023). "Instead of being on a screen you can be more out there and enjoy your life": Young people's understandings of physical activity for health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(10), 5880. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105880

Wu, Y., Van Gerven, P. W. M., de Groot, R. H. M., O Eijnde, B., Seghers, J., Winkens, B., & Savelberg, H. H. C. M. (2023). The association between academic schedule and physical activity behaviors in university students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 1572. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021572

Announcement

EDUPIJ Citation Metrics

EDUPIJ News!

ANNOUNCEMENT

Message from the Editor-in-Chief,

We would like to inform our authors, reviewers, and stakeholders that EDUPIJ has entered Scopus’s re-evaluation process, as officially communicated (dated 2025-12-09). This assessment is a standard quality assurance practice applied to indexed journals and aims to ensure sustained editorial quality, ethical integrity, and alignment with Scopus’s evolving evaluation framework.

EDUPIJ welcomes this process and views it as an opportunity to further consolidate its editorial governance, strengthen publication ethics, and enhance peer-review rigor.

Strengthening Editorial and Ethical Standards

To ensure full compliance with international best practices and to proactively address Scopus evaluation criteria, the following measures have been formally implemented:

1. Selective Acceptance Policy for 2026 and Beyond

In response to increased submission volume in 2025 (see Journal Metrics: https://edupij.com/index/sayfa/18/journal-metrics), EDUPIJ will adopt a more selective acceptance policy starting in 2026 and continuing in the years ahead. In doing so, the geographic distribution of authors will also be taken into account to ensure that editorial decisions are informed by transparent, year-to-year submission and authorship patterns. Acceptance rates will be carefully aligned with editorial capacity to ensure a rigorous double-blind peer review process supported by active reviewer engagement and uncompromised editorial oversight. This policy reflects our commitment to quality-driven growth rather than volume-based expansion, and it directly addresses observations that the geographic spread of authors has changed significantly during the same period by ensuring that any such shifts are systematically monitored and considered within our quality assurance framework.

In line with this approach, we have adopted a Publication Volume Policy, enacted on 2025-12-07, which establishes clear upper limits on annual publication volume and defines a framework for maintaining EDUPIJ’s output at sustainable, long-term levels, comparable to pre-2025 volumes under normal conditions. This policy is also publicly available at https://edupij.com/index/sayfa/41/publication-volume-journal-metrics-policy.

From 2026 onwards, our objective is to maintain a moderate and stable annual volume, prioritising quality and selectivity rather than growth.

2. Enhanced Author and Manuscript Integrity Screening

All submissions now undergo mandatory integrity checks, including automated screening for retraction history and potential ethical risks prior to peer review. These procedures are designed to safeguard originality, research integrity, and transparency at every stage of the editorial process.

3. Establishment of a Publication Ethics Review Committee

A dedicated Publication Ethics Review Committee has been constituted to evaluate high-risk submissions, oversee ethical investigations when necessary, and ensure consistent adherence to COPE guidelines and internationally recognized publishing standards. All ethical decisions are documented and managed through a structured, transparent process.

Ongoing Commitment:

EDUPIJ remains firmly committed to rigorous double-blind peer review, transparent editorial policies, responsible scholarly communication, and the advancement of high-quality educational research at an international level.

Our journal continues to demonstrate steady progress in terms of international visibility, indexing coverage, and citation performance. We are confident that the Scopus re-evaluation process will further support the journal’s long-term sustainability and academic impact.

We sincerely thank our authors, reviewers, and the broader scholarly community for their continued trust and contribution to EDUPIJ.

Sincerely,
Prof. Turgut Karaköse, Editor-in-Chief

Posted: 2025-12-09