Students’ learning in the time of Artificial Intelligence (AI): Students’ perceptions of using AI tools to improve their language learning in Kuwait
Article Number: e2025154 | Published Online: April 2025 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.15.154
Hanan Alkandari
Full text PDF |
292 |
178
Abstract
Background/purpose. There is an ongoing debate on the potentiality of using AI for educational purposes, ranging from some optimistic views that anticipate AI to continue changing the interface of language education on one side, to a more cautious camp questioning the efficacy of the issue. As a significant group of stakeholders in the educational enterprise, students should be considered central to this debate, as any potential changes in the educational plans and policies will have a direct impact on their learning outcomes. Materials/methods. This study examines how students perceive tools of artificial intelligence to guide their language learning experiences in the Kuwaiti context. The quantitative approach was employed in this research, where students from the Public Authority of Applied Education and Training (PAAET) in Kuwait participated in the study by completing a questionnaire concerning what they think of AI as a learning toolkit. Findings indicate that inferences about learners’ technological aptitudes should not readily be accepted by members of academic institutions and that learners’ perceptions provide valuable insights in this matter. Results. The study uncovers some interesting findings on the realms of the importance of learner technological readiness, reliance on AI as an exclusive source of education, the social aspects of the learning process, and some ethical issues concerning trust and security. |
Conclusion. The study attracts attention to the value of learners’ perceptions in the transition to a digitally geared educational environment. It underscores the need for a prudent approach to integrating AI in teaching and learning experiences. This is why decision-makers need to engage in a careful appraisal of the role AI currently plays and can play in the future.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence, language learning, perceptions, digital transition, technological readiness
ReferencesAbbad, M. (2021). Using the UTAUT model to understand students’ usage of e-learning systems in developing countries. Education and information technologies, 26(6), 7205-7224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10573-5
Al Shuraiaan, A., Al Bloushi, B., & Al Bloushi, L. (2024). The double-edged sword: Analyzing the influence of technology on English language learning in Kuwait higher education institutions (HEIs). International Journal of Middle Eastern Research, 3(1), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijmer.2024.3.1.3
Alenezi, W. (2024). Potentiality and apprehensions of artificial intelligence in education: Perspectives of education staff. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(4), 942-956. https://www.ijemst.net/index.php/ijemst/index
Alshammari, A., & Al-Enezi, S. (2024). Role of artificial intelligence in enhancing learning outcomes of pre-service social studies teachers. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 15(4), 163-196. https://doi.org/10.46328/jsser.v15i4.5787
Amoozadeh, M., Daniels, D., Nam, D., Kumar, A., Chen, S., Hilton, M., & Alipour, M. (2024). Trust in Generative AI among students: An exploratory study. The 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, (pp. 67-73). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.04631
Annamalai, N., Bervell, B., Mireku, O., & Andoh, K. (2025). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Modelling students’ motivation for continuous use of ChatGPT based on a modified self-determination theory. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100346
Baker, T., & Smith, L. (2019). Educ-ai-tion rebooted? exploring the future of artificial intelligence in schools and colleges. Technical report, Nesta Foundation. https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/Future_of_AI_and_education_v5_WEB.pdf
Bax, S., & Chan, S. (2019). Using eye-tracking research to investigate language test validity and design. System, 83, 64-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.01.007
Byrne, B. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge.
Chan, C., & Tsi, L. (2023). The AI revolution in education: Will AI replace or assist teachers in higher education? Computers and Society. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.01185
Choung, H., David, P., & Ross, A. (2023). Trust and ethics in AI. Ai & Society, 38(2), 733-745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01473-4
Dolenc, K., & Brumen, M. (2024). Exploring social and computer science students’ perceptions of AI integration in (foreign) language instruction. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100285
Fang, S., Wu, X., & Lai, I. (2021). Factors affecting Macau undergraduate students' acceptance of hospitality English app: applicability of UTAUT model. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 29(3), 250-266. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2021.114510
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Francis, N. J., Jones, S., & Smith, D. P. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: Balancing innovation and integrity. British Journal of Biomedical Science, 81, 14048. https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Educational International.
Hoi, V. (2020). Understanding higher education learners' acceptance and use of mobile devices for language learning: A Rasch-based path modeling approach. Computers & Education, 146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103761
Hsu, L. (2023). EFL learners’ self-determination and acceptance of LMOOCs: The UTAUT model. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(7), 1177-1205. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1976210
Huang, F., Teo, T., & Zhao, X. (2023). Examining factors influencing Chinese ethnic minority English teachers’ technology adoption: an extension of the UTAUT model. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2239304
Hyland, K. (2013). Student perceptions of hidden messages in teacher written feedback. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(3), 180-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.06.003
Jin, Y., Yan, L., Echeverria, V., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100348
Kanber, H., Jassim, K., Al-Taai, S., Ibrahim, M., & Farhan, N. (2025). The Role of Digital Educational Content in Eliminating Traditional Methods in the Educational Process within Iraqi Universities. Educational Process: International Journal, 14. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.14.50
Kelly, S., Kaye, S., & Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2023). What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? A systematic review. Telematics and Informatics, 77, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101925
Kirovska-Simjanoska, D. (2021). Designing an ESP course for the 21st century students: The clash of the digital immigrants and natives. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 17-30. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2101017K
Liu, Y. Z. (2024). A systematic review of research on emotional artificial intelligence in English language education. System, 126, 103478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103478
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed. An argument for AI in Education. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1475756
McStay, A. (2020). Emotional AI and EdTech: serving the public good? Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 270-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1686016
Milad, M., & Fayez, F. (2024). Your Way AI Way: Let‟ s Meet Half-Way: Paradigm Shift in TEFL. World Journal of English Language, 14(5), 468-468. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n5p468
Mushthoza, D., Syariatin, N., Tahalele, O., Telussa, S., Rasmi, R., & Mokodenseho, S. (2023). Analyzing the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the future of English language teaching and learning. Journal on Education, 6(1), 1549-1557. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i1.3115
Niemand, T., & Mai, R. (2018). Flexible cutoff values for fit indices in the evaluation of structural equation models. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-018-0602-9, Ed.) Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(6), 1148–1172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-018-0602-9
Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2011). Identity, language learning, and social change. Language teaching, 44(4), 412-446. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000309
Pedró, F. (2020). Applications of Artificial Intelligence to higher education: possibilities, evidence, and challenges. IUL Research, 1(1), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.57568/iulres.v1i1.43
Qin, F., & Yan, J. (2020). Understanding user trust in artificial intelligence-based educational systems: Evidence from China. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51, 1693-1710. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12994
Raffaghelli, J., Rodríguez, M., Guerrero-Roldán, A., & Bañere, D. (2022). Applying the UTAUT model to explain the students' acceptance of an early warning system in Higher Education. Computers & Education, 182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104468
Reiss, M. (2021). The Use of Al in Education: Practicalities and Ethical Considerations. London Review of Education, 19(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.19.1.05
Schroeder, N., & Gotch, C. (2015). Persistent Issues in Pedagogical Agent Research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115597625
Sousa, V., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2010). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross‐cultural health care research: a clear and user‐friendly guideline. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x, Ed.) Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(2), 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
Southgate, E. (2020). Artificial intelligence, ethics, equity and higher education:A ‘beginning-of-the-discussion’ paper. Technical Report. National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education, 1-20.
Steponenaite, A., & Barakat, B. (2023). Plagiarism in AI empowered world. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 434-442). Switzerland: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35897-5_31
Strzelecki, A. (2023). To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology. Interactive learning environments, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881
Taber, K. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2, Ed.) Research in science education, 48, 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Taktak, M., Bellibaş, S., & Özgenel, M. (2024). Use of ChatGPT in Education: Future Strategic Road Map with SWOT Analysis. Educational Process: International Journal, 13(3), 7-21. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2024.133.1
Trewin, S., Basson, S., Muller, M., Branham, S., & Treviranus, J. (2019). Considerations for AI fairness for people with disabilities. AI Matters, 5(3), 40-63. https://doi.org/10.1145/3362077.3362086
Tu, Y., & Hwang, G. (2023). University students’ conceptions of ChatGPT-supported learning: a drawing and epistemic network analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2286370
Venkatesh, M. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Wang, B., Rau, P., & Yuan, T. (2023). Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale. Behaviour & information technology, 24(9), 1324-1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2072768
Wang, X., Pang, H., Wallace, P., Wang, Q., & Chen, W. (2024). Learners’ perceived AI presences in AI-supported language learning: A study of AI as a humanized agent from community of inquiry. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(4), 814-840. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2056203
White, J. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and People with Disabilities: a Reflection on Human–AI Partnerships. In F. Chen, & J. Zhou, Humanity Driven AI: Productivity, Well-being, Sustainability and Partnership (pp. 279-310). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72188-6_14
Zaim, M., Arsyad, S., Waluyo, B., Ardi, H., Al Hafizh, M., Syafitri, W., . . . Hardiah, M. (2024). AI-powered EFL pedagogy: integrating generative AI into university teaching preparation through UTAUT and activity theory. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100335
Zhang, W. (2022). The Role of technology-based education and teacher professional development in English as a Foreign Language Classes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.910315
Zheldibayeva, R. (2025). GenAI as a Learning Buddy for Non-English Majors: Effects on Listening and Writing Performance. Educational Process: International Journal, 14, e2025051. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.14.51
Zhu, M. (2022). Factors influencing analysis for level of engineering english education based on artificial intelligence technology. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4447209