Volume 15 (2025) Download Cover Page

Stylistic Variations in Thematic Structure Across Academic Genres: A Case Study of EFL Graduate Students

Article Number: e2025164  |  Published Online: April 2025  |  DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.15.164

Nujood Al-Reshaid , Ahmad I Alhojailan

Abstract

Background/purpose. Academic writing in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) poses challenges for graduate students, particularly in achieving coherence and organization. Thematic choices play a crucial role in guiding readers and ensuring textual cohesion. While Theme selection has been explored in various contexts, little research has examined how Saudi female graduate students use thematic structures across academic genres. This study investigates their thematic choices to understand how they adapt to academic writing conventions and genre expectations.

Materials/methods.  The study analyzed 108 written assignments from Saudi female graduate students across different academic genres. Semi-structured interviews with 18 students provided further insights into their thematic choices and writing strategies. Using a content analysis approach based on Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) theory, particularly Martin and Rose’s (2007) semantic approach, the study categorized thematic structures into topical, textual, and interpersonal Themes to assess their distribution and function.

Results.  Findings reveal a dominant use of topical, unmarked Themes across all genres, with variations in marked, textual, and interpersonal themes. Research papers featured more topical, unmarked Themes, reinforcing subject focus and formality, while essays used more textual and interpersonal Themes for engagement and flow. Genre expectations influenced students' thematic choices, reflecting their awareness of academic writing norms.

Conclusion. This study underscores the importance of Theme selection in enhancing coherence and aligning with genre conventions. The findings contribute to SFL research by highlighting how Theme variation supports textual cohesion and communication goals, offering insights for improving EFL academic writing instruction.

Keywords: Thematic choices, writing, EFL, stylistic variations, academic genres

References

Ahangari, S. (2015). Thematic organization in MA TEFL students’ argumentative, cause and effect, and process types of writing. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(12), 1-23.

Alanazi, M. H. (2020). The predictive effects of self-regulated writing strategies on writing performance of Saudi EFL university students. Journal of Educational and Psychological Studies, 14(4), 668-678. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jeps.vo14iss4pp668-678

Alharbi, M. A. (2019). EFL university students’ voice on challenges and solution in learning academic writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8, 577-588. http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/article/view/15276

Alhojailan, A. I. (2019). The effect of using academic vocabulary on graduate students’ achievements in their assignments. English Language Teaching, 12(9), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n9p33

Alnufaie, M., & Grenfell, M. (2012). EFL students’ writing strategies in Saudi Arabian ESP writing classes: Perspectives on learning strategies in self-access language learning. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 3(4), 407-422. http://sisaljournal.org/archives/dec12/alnufaie_grenfel

Alotaibi, H. S. (2020). The thematic structure in research article abstracts: Variations across disciplines. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1756146

Al-Qahtani, A. A. (2021). The integration of corpus-based approach with EFL academic writing in the Saudi context. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 10(1), 22-45.

Al-Reshaid, N., & Alhojailan, A. I. (2023). Rhythmic complexity of graduate students’ written assignments: An analysis of their thematic choices. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(11), 2928–2940. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1311.24

Alsehibany, R. A. (2021). EFL Saudi student’s attitudes toward peer feedback activities in a writing class. PSU Research Review, 1-16.

Alyousef, H. S. (2016). A multimodal discourse analysis of international postgraduate business students’ finance texts: An investigation of theme and information value. Social Semiotic, 26(5), 486-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2015.1124518

Alyousef, H. S., & Alzahrani, A. A. (2020). A functional analysis of the thematic organization in electrical engineering research article introductions written in English by native and Saudi scholars: A comparative study. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 11(2), 114-141. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no2.9

Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.153

Banaruee, H. (2016). Recast in writing. Sana Gostar Publications.

Banaruee, H., Khatin-Zadeh, O., & Ruegg, R. (2018). Recasts vs. direct corrective feedback on writing performance of high school EFL learners. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1455333

Bazerman, C. (2004). Speech acts, genres and activity systems: How texts organize activity and people. In C. Bazerman, & P. Prior (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices (pp. 309-339). Erlbaum.

Bazerman, C. (2012). Genre as social action. In J. P. Gee, & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 226-238). Routledge.

Beck, S. W., & Jeffery, J. V. (2009). Genre and thinking in academic writing tasks. Journal of Literacy Research, 41, 228-272.

Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture power. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Bruce, I. (2018). The textual expression of critical thinking in Ph.D. discussions in applied linguistics. Journal of English for Specific Purposes at Tertiary Level, 6(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2018.6.1.1

Buell, M. (2018). It’s not just about the teaching: Integrating basic writing history and theory in a master’s level graduate seminar. Journal of Basic Writing, 37(2), 92-119.

Burgos, E. G. (2017). Use of the genre-based approach to teach expository essays to English pedagogy students. HOW, 24(2), 141-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.19183/how.24.2.330.

Chang, P., & Lee, M. (2019). Exploring textual and interpersonal Themes in the expository essays of college students of different linguistic backgrounds. English for Specific Purposes, 54(2019), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2019.01.002

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dakka, F., & Wade, A. (2019). Writing time: A rhythmic analysis of contemporary academic writing, Higher Education Research & Development, 38(1), 185-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1540555

Deb, J. (2018). Affective factors in second language writing: Is it a matter of concern? The Morning Watch: Educational and Social Analysis, 46(1-2), 1-11.

Doran, Y. J., Martin, J. R., & Herrington, M. (2024). Rethinking context: realisation, instantiation, and individuation in systemic functional linguistics. Journal of World Languages, 10(1), 177-220. https://doaj-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/article/f57cf14117b243c9a0c21389b6afc2bf

Dostal, H. M., & Wolbers, K. A. (2016). Examining student writing proficiencies across genres: results of an intervention study. Deafness & Education International, 18(3),159-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/14643154.2016.1230415

Eggins, S. (2007). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). Continuum.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.

Fareed, M., Ashraf, A., & Bilal, M. (2016). ESL learners’ writing skills: Problems, factors and suggestions. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 4(2), 81-92.

Graves, P. (2019). Rhythm in Black & White: Helping L2 English writers hear and speak on the page. Scriptum: Creative Writing Research Journal, 6(1), 40-78. http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201903061755

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (2014). An introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Revised by C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. Routledge.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan. R. (1985). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday's introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.

Han, J., & Hiver, P. (2018). Genre-based L2 writing instruction and writing-specific psychological factors: The dynamics of change. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 44-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.03.001

Hawes, T. (2015). Thematic progression in the writing of students and professionals. Ampersand, 2, 93-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2015.06.002

Hayes, J. R. (2009). From idea to text. In R. Beard, D. Myhill, M. Nystrand, & J. Riley (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of writing development (pp. 65-79). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Heron, M., & Corradini, E. (2019). Writing for professional recognition in higher education: Understanding genre and expertise. Higher Education Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1705256

Huang, Y., & Zhang, L. J. (2019). Does a process-genre approach help improve students’ argumentative writing in English as a foreign language? Findings from an intervention study. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1649223

Hyland, K. (2002). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365

Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and Second Language Writing. The University of Michigan Press.

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum.

Hyland, K. (2017). Genre and second language writing. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 2359-2364.

Kain, D. J. (2005). Constructing genre: A threefold typology. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14(4), 375-409. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1404_2

Khazaal, E. N. (2019). Improving postgraduates’ academic writing skills with summarizing strategy. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 10(3), 413-428. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no3.29

Kim, K. M. (2020). An explorative study of task representation in academic writing: Second language writers in a graduate course in the United States. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 24(3), 1-24.

Kress, G. (1999). Genre and the changing contexts for English language arts. Language Arts, 76, 461-469.

Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364

Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2015). Practical research: Planning and design (11th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and structure. John Benjamins.

Martin, J. R. (2000). Design and practice: Enacting functional linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 116-126.

Martin, J. R. (2015). Cohesion and texture. In D. Tannen, H. A. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 61-81). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd ed.). Continuum.

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. Equinox.

McGrath, L., & Kaufhold, K. (2016). English for specific purposes and academic literacies: Eclecticism in academic writing pedagogy. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(8), 933-947. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1198762

Mustofa, M. I., & Kurniawan, E. (2023). Theme and thematic progression in a recount text by an advanced student. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 481-494.

Obeid, R. (2017). Second language writing and assessment: Voices from within the Saudi EFL context. English Language Teaching, 10(6), 174-181. http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n6p174

Paltridge, B. (2013). Genre and English for specific purposes. In B. Paltridge, & S. Starfield (Eds.), Handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 347-366). Wiley.

Park, K., & Nam, D. (2015). Analysis of thematic structure in L2 writing: A systemic functional perspective. The SNU Journal of Education Research, 65-88.

Peters, M. A. (2008). Academic writing, genres and philosophy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(7), 819-831. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00511.x

Piamsai, C. (2020). The effect of scaffolding on non-proficient EFL learners’ performance in an academic writing class. Language Education and Acquisition Research Network Journal (LEARN), 13(2), 288-305.

Potter, L. (2016). Ideological representations and Theme-Rheme analysis in English and Arabic news reports: A systemic functional approach. Functional Linguistics, 3(5), 1-20.

Reid, I. (1987). A generic frame for debates about genre. In I. Reid (Ed.), The place of genre in teaming: Current debates (pp. 1-8). Deakin University, Centers for Studies in Literary Education.

Shukri, N. A. (2014). Second language writing and culture: Issues and challenges from the Saudi learners’ perspective. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 5(3), 190-207.

Summers, S. (2016). Building expertise: The toolkit in UCLA’s graduate writing center. The Writing Center Journal, 35(2), 117-145.

Tardy, C. M. (2009). Building genre knowledge. Parlor Press.

Thompson, G. (2014). Introducing functional grammar (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Thongyoi, K., & Poonpon, K. (2020). Phrasal complexity measure as predictors of EFL university students’ English academic writing proficiency. rEFLections, 27(1), 44-61.

Uzun, K. (2017). The relationship between genre knowledge and writing performance. The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 5(2), 153-162.

Van Rijt, J. H. M., van den Broek, B., & van den Bergh, H. (2021). Refocusing writing style education? Relationships between stylistic lapses and the quality of Dutch secondary school students’ argumentative texts. Journal of Writing Research, 299-330.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wei, J. (2016). Effects of instruction on Chinese college students’ thematic choice in academic writing. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(14), 60-68.

Wolfersberger, M. A. (2007). Second language writing from sources: An ethnographic study of an argument essay task [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Auckland.

Announcement

EDUPIJ Citation Metrics

EDUPIJ News!

► Educational Process International Journal has changed to publish in article number order instead of in page range order beginning with Volume 14 (2025).