Volume 15 (2025) Download Cover Page

Perceptions of ChatGPT and the Complexity of Its Impact Among Higher Education Students: Evidence Across Ten Countries of Latin America and Europe

Article Number: e2025171  |  Published Online: April 2025  |  DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.15.171

Carlos Enrique George-Reyes , Raidell Avello-Martínez , Mariana Buenestado-Fernández

Abstract

Background/purpose. ChatGPT, an AI-based tool, has significantly impacted higher education by enhancing the learning and teaching experience. This study aimed to analyze students’ perceptions of ChatGPT’s role in higher education, focusing on five dimensions: perceived abilities, ethical concerns, satisfaction, academic impact, and skills development. Understanding these perceptions is crucial to harnessing their potential while addressing associated challenges.

Materials/methods.  The study surveyed 4,005 university students from ten countries in Latin America and Europe using a structured questionnaire. Data collection focused on quantitative measures, including correlations between ChatGPT usage and academic performance, skills development, and ethical concerns.

Results. The findings revealed a generally positive assessment of ChatGPT's capabilities. A strong correlation was found between using ChatGPT and improved academic performance (r=0.845, p<.001) as well as the development of advanced skills like academic writing and critical thinking (r=0.720, p<.001). Satisfaction varied by institutional context, with private universities reporting higher satisfaction levels. Ethical concerns, such as plagiarism and misinformation, exhibited more dispersed responses, highlighting the need for strategies promoting responsible use.

Conclusion. The study underscores ChatGPT’s potential as a transformative resource in higher education, particularly in enhancing academic outcomes and skill development. However, ethical and pedagogical challenges remain critical to ensuring its responsible integration into educational practices.

Keywords: ChatGPT, higher education, complexity, educational innovation

References

Abdalgane, M., & Othman, K. A. J. (2023). Utilizing Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Saudi EFL Tertiary Level Classrooms. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 23(1), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v23i1.124

Alafnan, M. A., & Mohdzuki, S. F. (2023). Do Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Have a Writing Style? An Investigation into the Stylistic Features of ChatGPT-4. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology, 3(3), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.37965/jait.2023.0267

Alkamel, M. A. A., & Alwagieh, N. A. S. (2024). Utilizing an adaptable artificial intelligence writing tool (ChatGPT) to enhance academic writing skills among Yemeni university EFL students. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101095

Altmäe, S., Sola-Leyva, A., & Salumets, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: A friend or a foe? Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 47(1), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.04.009

Asad, M. M., Shahzad, S., Shah, S. H. A., Sherwani, F., & Almusharraf, N. M. (2024). ChatGPT as artificial intelligence-based generative multimedia for English writing pedagogy: Challenges and opportunities from an educator’s perspective. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-02-2024-0021

Bender, S. M. (2024). Awareness of Artificial Intelligence as an Essential Digital Literacy: ChatGPT and Gen-AI in the Classroom. Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education, 31(2), 161-174. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2024.2309995

Chan, C., & Tsi, L. H. Y. (2023). The AI Revolution in Education: Will AI Replace or Assist Teachers in Higher Education? ArXiv, abs/2305.01185. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.01185

Chauke, T. A., Mkhize, T. R., Methi, L., & Dlamini, N. (2024). Postgraduate Students’ Perceptions on the Benefits Associated with Artificial Intelligence Tools for Academic Success: The Use of the ChatGPT AI Tool. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 6(1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.2024.4

COVID-19 Social Science Lab. (2024a). ChatGPT Student Survey. https://www.covidsoclab.org/chatgpt-student-survey/

COVID-19 Social Science Lab. (2024b). Ethical approvals. https://www.covidsoclab.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Ethical_Approvals.pdf

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8

Currie, G. M. (2023). Academic integrity and artificial intelligence: Is ChatGPT hype, hero, or heresy? Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, 53(5), 719-730. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.04.008

Daniel, S., Pacheco, M., Smith, B., Burriss, S., & Hundley, M. (2023). Cultivating writerly virtues: Critical human elements of multimodal writing in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 67(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1298

Demartini, C. G., Sciascia, L., Bosso, A., & Manuri, F. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Bringing Improvements to Adaptive Learning in Education: A Case Study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031347

Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Saad, H. B. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: Examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(2), 615-622. https://doi.org/10.5114/BIOLSPORT.2023.125623

Duah, J. E., & McGivern, P. (2024). How generative artificial intelligence has blurred notions of authorial identity and academic norms in higher education, necessitating clear university usage policies. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-11-2023-0213

Efebeh, V. E., Orishede, F., & Igoh, J. M. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and Academic Research in Contemporary Society: Evidence from University Academics. Ianna Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 6(3 Special Issue), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13152543

Emenike, M. E., & Emenike, B. U. (2023). Was This Title Generated by ChatGPT? Considerations for Artificial Intelligence Text-Generation Software Programs for Chemists and Chemistry Educators. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(4), 1413-1418. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00063

Endris, A., Tlili, A., Huang, R., Xu, L., Chang, T., & Mishra, S. (2024). Features, Components and Processes of Developing Policy for Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED): Toward a Sustainable AIED Development and Adoption. Leadership and Policy in Schools. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2024.2312999

Esplugas, M. (2023). The use of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance academic communication, education and research: A balanced approach. Journal of Hand Surgery: European Volume, 48(8), 819-822. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934231185746

George, B., & Wooden, O. (2023). Managing the Strategic Transformation of Higher Education through Artificial Intelligence. Administrative Sciences, 13(9), 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13090196

Gomes, W. J., Evora, P. R. B., & Solange, S. G. (2023). Artificial Intelligence is Irreversibly Bound to Academic Publishing—ChatGPT is Cleared for Scientific Writing and Peer Review. Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 38(4). https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0963

Ivanov, S. (2023). The dark side of artificial intelligence in higher education. The Service Industries Journal, 43(15–16), 1055–1082. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2023.2258799

Jiang, Z., Xu, Z., Pan, Z., He, J., & Xie, K. (2023). Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Facilitating Assessment of Writing Performance in Second Language Learning. Languages, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8040247

Johnston, H., Wells, R. F., Shanks, E. M., Boey, T., & Parsons, B. N. (2024). Student perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00149-4

Kim, M., Kim, N., & Heidari, A. (2022). Learner experience in artificial intelligence-scaffolded argumentation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(8), 1301–1316. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2042792

Kim, S. (2024). Research ethics and issues regarding the use of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence platforms by authors and reviewers: A narrative review. Science Editing, 11(2), 96-106. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.343

Little, R. J., & Rubin, D. B. (2019). Statistical analysis with missing data. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119482260

Liu, Y., Park, J., & McMinn, S. (2024). Using generative artificial intelligence/ChatGPT for academic communication: Students’ perspectives. International Journal of Applied Linguistics (United Kingdom). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12574

McInnes, R., Carandang, M., & Kulkarni, A. (2023). Unleashing the power of gen-AI for digital education development. ASCILITE Publications. https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2023.520

Michels, S. (2023). Teaching (with) Artificial Intelligence: The Next Twenty Years. Journal of Political Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2023.2266848

Perezchica-Vega, J. E., Sepúlveda-Rodríguez, J. A., & Román-Méndez, A. D. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Uses and opinions of teachers. European Public and Social Innovation Review, 9. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-593

Pigott, T. D. (2001). A review of methods for missing data. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7(4), 353–383. https://doi.org/10.1076/edre.7.4.353.8937

Rad, H. S., Alipour, R., & Jafarpour, A. (2023). Using artificial intelligence to foster students’ writing feedback literacy, engagement, and outcome: A case of Wordtune application. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2208170

Ravšelj, D., Aristovnik, A., Keržič, D., Tomaževič, N., Umek, L., Brezovar, N., & et al. (2024). Higher education students' early perceptions of ChatGPT: Global survey data. Mendeley Data. https://doi.org/10.17632/ymg9nsn6kn

Ravšelj D, Keržič D, Tomaževič N, Umek L, Brezovar N, A. Iahad N, et al. (2025) Higher education students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions. PLoS ONE 20(2): e0315011. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315011

Sarfo, J. O. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Chatbot – ChatGPT and High-Tech Plagiarism Concerns in a Digital Age: Is Detection Possible? Journal of Advocacy, Research, and Education, 10(2), 55-58. https://doi.org/10.13187/jare.2023.2.55

Shi, J., & Xuwei, Z. (2023). Integration of AI with higher education innovation: Reforming future educational directions. International Journal of Science and Research, 12(3), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.21275/sr231023183401

Tomar, P. & Verma, S. (2021). Impact and Role of AI Technologies in Teaching, Learning, and Research in Higher Education. In S. Verma & P. Tomar (Eds.), Impact of AI Technologies on Teaching, Learning, and Research in Higher Education (pp. 190-203). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4763-2.ch012

Torres-Gómez, A. (2024). Information needs and perception of artificial intelligence tools among doctoral students in educational research in Tlaxcala, Mexico. Investigacion Bibliotecologica, 38(98), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2024.98.58852

Tossell, C., Tenhundfeld, N. L., Momen, A., Cooley, K., & De Visser, E. J. (2024). Student Perceptions of ChatGPT Use in a College Essay Assignment: Implications for Learning, Grading, and Trust in Artificial Intelligence. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2024.3355015

Tsao, J., & Nogues, C. (2024). Beyond the author: Artificial intelligence, creative writing, and intellectual emancipation. Poetics, 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2024.101865

Vecchiarini, M., & Somià, T. (2023). Redefining entrepreneurship education in the age of artificial intelligence: An explorative analysis. International Journal of Management Education, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100879

Wale, B. D. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: Effects of using integrative automated writing evaluation programs on honing academic writing instruction. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 43(1), 273-287. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v43i1.67715

Wang, Z. (2022). Computer-assisted EFL writing and evaluations based on artificial intelligence: A case from a college reading and writing course. Library Hi Tech, 40(1), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-05-2020-0113

World Medical Association. (2024). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. https://www.wma.net/es/policies-post/declaracion-de-helsinki/

Yang, L., Lim, W., & Zhao, H. (2022). Efficacy of an Adaptive Learning System on Course Scores. Systems, 11(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11010031

Announcement

EDUPIJ Citation Metrics

EDUPIJ News!

► Educational Process International Journal has changed to publish in article number order instead of in page range order beginning with Volume 14 (2025).