Bridging Vision and Reality: Examining Strategic Planning Implementation in Indonesian State Schools

Background/purpose. This research analyzes the challenges and opportunities of implementing strategic planning in public schools. Strategic planning is a crucial tool for enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of educational institutions. In public schools, strategic planning helps align educational goals with available resources, ensuring sustainable improvement in student outcomes and institutional performance. On the other hand, public schools often face challenges such as budget constraints, policy changes, and diverse student needs, making strategic planning essential for navigating these complexities.

Materials/methods. This research uses a descriptive method with a qualitative approach. Data processing uses the Nvivo12 application.

Results. The research results show that school strategic planning must be flexible, data-based, and involve various parties to effectively meet local needs. Implementation of the strategy has had a positive impact on the quality of education, including academic achievement and transformation of school culture. However, improvements in management and resource support are still needed. Integrated monitoring and evaluation are the keys to success, and they are supported by technology, relevant indicators, and collaboration between stakeholders. The involvement of students, parents and local communities has also been proven to strengthen the relevance of strategic planning to the needs of all parties. In addition, innovation and adaptation to change show the importance of sustainable development in every school.

Conclusion. As a result, resistance to change can be overcome with a participatory approach and an organizational culture that supports innovation and collaboration.

Keywords: Strategic planning, sustainable development, stakeholder involvement, school principals

References

Abass Ayodele, L., & Mohd Ali, H. (2010). Surveying The Practice of Strategic Planning for School Excellence. International Business Education Journal, 3, 79-98. https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/IBEJ/article/view/1387

Allison, M., & Kaye, J. (2005). Strategic Planning for Nonprofit Organizations: A Practical Guide and Workbook. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118769690

AlMalki, & Durugbo. (2023). Evaluating Critical Institutional Factors of Industry 4.0 for Education Reform. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang, 188, 122327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122327

Bantilan , Jecyl C., Prima O. Deguito, Archie S. Otero, Analyn R. Regidor, and Marilou D. Junsay. 2023. “Strategic Planning in Education: A Systematic Review”. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies 45 (1):40-54. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v45i1976

Biondi, & Russo. (2022). Integrating Strategic Planning and Performance Management in Universities: A Multiple Case-Study Analysis. J. Manag. Gov, 26, 417–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-022-09628-7

Castillo, M. J. A. C. ., Córdova, M. M. E. R. ., Orozco, M. E. P. ., & Gurumendi, J. M. B. . (2024). Strategic Planning for the Management of Educational Institutions: Sistematic Review. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(8), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.4733

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4148/2470-6353.1252

Dagkas S, S. A. (2016). Exploring social and environmental factors affecting adolescents’ participation in physical activity. Europ Physic Edu Rev, 13(3), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x07081800

Djoundourian, & Shahin. (2022). Academia–Business Cooperation: A Strategic Plan for an Innovative Executive Education Program. Ind. High. Educ, 36, 835–845. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222221083852

Elbanna, & Abdel-Maksoud. (2023). An Organizational Innovation and the Role of Strategic Planning: The Case of the Dubai Hotel Industry. Manag. Sustain. Arab Rev, 2, 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1108/msar-09-2022-0045

Fauzi. (2023). Research vs. Non-Research Universities: Knowledge Sharing and Research Engagement among Academicians. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09719-4

Ferlie, & Ongaro. (2022). Strategic management in public services organizations: Concepts, schools and contemporary issues. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003054917

Garcia, Duran, Cardeño, Prieto, Garcia, & Paz. (2017). Strategic planning process: Stages carried out in small and medium-sized enterprises to optimize competitiveness. Espacios, 38(52), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2013.04.04

Graves, B.M., & Erickson, F.J. (2024). Strategic planning in higher education: perceptions of faculty and administrators at public institutions. Discov Educ, 264(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00351-z

Habeeb, Y. O., & Eyupoglu, S. Z. (2024). Strategic Planning, Transformational Leadership and Organization Performance: Driving Forces for Sustainability in Higher Education in Nigeria. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 16(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114348

Holmes, J. (2017). 20/20 Planning: The Story of the First Twenty Years of the Society for College and University Planning. Ann Arbor, MI: Society for College and University Planning, 1985. https://www.scup.org/ page/resources/books/ttp. Accessed October 4, 2017.

Keller, G. (1983). Academic Strategy: The Management Revolution in American Higher Education. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12160

Khasawneh, M. A. S. (2024). The Impact of Efficient Strategic Planning on Sound School Administration Among Public School Principals in Saudi Arabia. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 185–200. https://doi.org/10.70082/esiculture.vi.868

Kroboth, P. (2010). Viewpoints: Planning strategically. Am J Pharm Educ,74(1)

Ladera-Castañeda, M., Sotelo, C. G. M., Pacherres, M. Á. A., Castro-Rojas, M., & Soto, I. B. R. (2024). Strategic Planning And Quality Education In The Framework Of The Sdg’s In A Peruvian Public Technological Institute. Journal of Lifestyle and SDG’S Review, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v4.n00.pe01686

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713616671930

Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy Safari: A Guide Tour Through the Wilds of Strategic Management. 1st ed. New York, NY: Free Press. https://doi.org/10.1108/ws.1999.07948bae.002

Miranda-Ullón, Aguayo-Carvajal, & Villalva-Abarca, G. R. (2 C.E.). La planificación estratégica y la gestión de recursos de la información. Dominio De Las Ciencias, 4(3), 1044–1059. https://doi.org/10.15517/eci.v2i1.1216

Namazi, & Rezaei. (2023). Modelling the Role of Strategic Planning, Strategic Management Accounting Information System, and Psychological Factors on the Budgetary Slack. In Accounting Forum; Routledge: London, UK, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2022.2163040

Nasruji. (2024). The Effect of Education Strategic Planning on Education Quality Improvement in Senior High School of Batam City. Journal of Education and Technology Development, 2(1), 104–119. Retrieved from https://myjournal.or.id/index.php/JETD/article/view/284

Nomin, N., Resky, M., & Lusiana, L. (2025). Strategic Planning In Achieving Optimal Quality Of Education With School Based Management: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Education And Development, 13 (1), 435-444. https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v13i1.6647

Nwagwu. (2020). E-Learning Readiness of Universities in Nigeria—What are the Opinions of the Academic Staff of Nigeria’s Premier University? Educ. Inf. Technol, 25, 1343–1370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10026-0

Rahim, M., Hamidi, M., & Rasekh, N. (2021). Strategic Planning of Physical Education and Sports in Iranian Schools Using QSPM Matrix. Annals of Applied Sport Science, 9(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.52547/AASSJOURNAL.975

Rowley, D. J., & Sherman, H. (2001). From Strategy to Change: Implementing the Plan in Higher Education. 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2003.9324073

Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240x(200006)23:3%3C246::aid-nur9%3E3.0.co;2-h

Savini, F. (2024). Strategic planning for degrowth: What, who, how. Planning Theory, 0(0), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952241258693

Serafini, Moura, D., Almeida, D., & Rezende, D. (2022). Sustainable Development Goals in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review. J. Clean. Prod, 370, 133473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133473

Sevier, R. A. (2001). Strategic Planning in Higher Education: Theory and Practice. 1st ed. Washington, DC: CASE Books. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe.2001.24902cab.002

Tromp, S. A., & Ruben, B. D. (2010). Strategic Planning in Higher Education: A Guide for Leaders. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: National Association of College and University Business Officers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003442769-22

Tryba, Patzelt, & Breugst. (2023). Knowledge Diversity and Venture Growth: The Contingent Effects of Early Planning and Experimentation. Br. J. Manag, 34, 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12600

Tuytens, Vekeman, & Devos. (2021). Strategic Human Resource Management in Primary and Secondary Schools. An Explorative Study in Flanders (Belgium). Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh, 51, 711–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143221998706

Announcement

EDUPIJ Citation Metrics

EDUPIJ News!

ANNOUNCEMENT

Message from the Editor-in-Chief,

We would like to inform our authors, reviewers, and stakeholders that EDUPIJ has entered Scopus’s re-evaluation process, as officially communicated (dated 2025-12-09). This assessment is a standard quality assurance practice applied to indexed journals and aims to ensure sustained editorial quality, ethical integrity, and alignment with Scopus’s evolving evaluation framework.

EDUPIJ welcomes this process and views it as an opportunity to further consolidate its editorial governance, strengthen publication ethics, and enhance peer-review rigor.

Strengthening Editorial and Ethical Standards

To ensure full compliance with international best practices and to proactively address Scopus evaluation criteria, the following measures have been formally implemented:

1. Selective Acceptance Policy for 2026 and Beyond

In response to increased submission volume in 2025 (see Journal Metrics: https://edupij.com/index/sayfa/18/journal-metrics), EDUPIJ will adopt a more selective acceptance policy starting in 2026 and continuing in the years ahead. In doing so, the geographic distribution of authors will also be taken into account to ensure that editorial decisions are informed by transparent, year-to-year submission and authorship patterns. Acceptance rates will be carefully aligned with editorial capacity to ensure a rigorous double-blind peer review process supported by active reviewer engagement and uncompromised editorial oversight. This policy reflects our commitment to quality-driven growth rather than volume-based expansion, and it directly addresses observations that the geographic spread of authors has changed significantly during the same period by ensuring that any such shifts are systematically monitored and considered within our quality assurance framework.

In line with this approach, we have adopted a Publication Volume Policy, enacted on 2025-12-07, which establishes clear upper limits on annual publication volume and defines a framework for maintaining EDUPIJ’s output at sustainable, long-term levels, comparable to pre-2025 volumes under normal conditions. This policy is also publicly available at https://edupij.com/index/sayfa/41/publication-volume-journal-metrics-policy.

From 2026 onwards, our objective is to maintain a moderate and stable annual volume, prioritising quality and selectivity rather than growth.

2. Enhanced Author and Manuscript Integrity Screening

All submissions now undergo mandatory integrity checks, including automated screening for retraction history and potential ethical risks prior to peer review. These procedures are designed to safeguard originality, research integrity, and transparency at every stage of the editorial process.

3. Establishment of a Publication Ethics Review Committee

A dedicated Publication Ethics Review Committee has been constituted to evaluate high-risk submissions, oversee ethical investigations when necessary, and ensure consistent adherence to COPE guidelines and internationally recognized publishing standards. All ethical decisions are documented and managed through a structured, transparent process.

Ongoing Commitment:

EDUPIJ remains firmly committed to rigorous double-blind peer review, transparent editorial policies, responsible scholarly communication, and the advancement of high-quality educational research at an international level.

Our journal continues to demonstrate steady progress in terms of international visibility, indexing coverage, and citation performance. We are confident that the Scopus re-evaluation process will further support the journal’s long-term sustainability and academic impact.

We sincerely thank our authors, reviewers, and the broader scholarly community for their continued trust and contribution to EDUPIJ.

Sincerely,
Prof. Turgut Karaköse, Editor-in-Chief

Posted: 2025-12-09