Metacognitive Instruction on Asking Questions to Improve Reading Comprehension
Article Number: e2025215 | Available Online: May 2025 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.16.215
Martina Ares-Ferreirós , Sonia Alfonso Gil , José María Álvarez Martínez-Iglesias , Abraham Bernárdez-Gómez
Full text PDF |
3073 |
1375
Abstract
|
Background: This study analyzes the use of a text-related question strategy aimed at improving the reading comprehension and reading awareness abilities of a metacognitively trained group of students with reading comprehension difficulties. In an initial Grade 3 primary school students' assessment in the same classroom, some students were incidentally found to have more difficulties with reading comprehension than other typical peers. All of the students had been classmates since the beginning of primary school. The educational center decided to support those students (N=8) with a metacognitive reading intervention while the other students continued with the usual teaching methods. The total number of students in the classroom was 30. Methods: The training program consisted of learning the questions-about-the-text strategy by means of the Planning Facilitation method. The measuring instruments used were reading comprehension evaluation scale (ACL for its acronym in Spanish) for reading comprehension and Reading Awareness Scale (ESCOLA for its acronym in Spanish) for reading awareness. A pre-test, post-test and follow-up approach was used for carrying out the study. Results: After the program’s application, the intervention group improved the comprehension and awareness abilities and became equal to their classmates or comparison group. |
Conclusions: The Planning Facilitation fosters this improvement by promoting discussion between classmates and ensuring a reflective verbalization on questions about a text.
Keywords: Reading comprehension; reading awareness; cognitive processes; metacognitive instruction; planning facilitation
ReferencesAl-Qawabeh, R. H., & Aljazi, A. A. (2018). The effectiveness of using PQ4R strategy in teaching reading comprehension in arabic language subject among ninth grade students’ achievement in Jordan. World journal of educational research, 5, 159-171. doi:10.22158/wjer.v5n2p159
Ares-Ferreirós, M., & Deaño, M. (2019). Instrucción metacognitiva y procesamiento simultáneo. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 1, 215-224. doi: 10.17060/ijodaep.2019.n1.v1.1411
Artis, A. B. (2008). Improving marketing students' reading comprehension with the SQ3R method. Journal of marketing education, 30, 130-137. doi:10.1177/0273475308318070
Bibi, R. (2011). Effect of PQ4R study strategy on scholastic achievement of secondary school students in Punjab [Doctoral dissertation, Foundation University College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan].http://prr.hec.gov.pk/jspui/handle/123456789/2113
Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 22, 1-14. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(83)80002-4
Català, G., Català, M., Molina, E., & Monclús, R. (2001). Evaluación de la comprensión lectora [Reading comprehension evaluation]. Graò.
Das, J. P. (2015). Three faces of cognitive processes: Theory, assessment, and intervention. In Cognition, intelligence, and achievement (pp. 19-47). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-410388-7.00003-8
Das, J. P., & Misra, S. (2015). Cognitive Planning and Executive Functions: Applications in Management and Education. SAGE Publications India https://doi.org/10.4135/9789351507826
Das, J. P., Mishra, R. K., & Pool, J. E. (1995). An experiment on cognitive remediation of word-reading difficulty. Journal of learning disabilities, 28, 66-79. doi:10.1177/002221949502800201
Das, J. P., Naglieri, J. A., & Kirby, J. R. (1994). Assessment of cognitive processes: The PASS theory of intelligence. Allyn and Bacon.
Deaño, M., Alfonso, S., & Das, J. P. (2015). Program of arithmetic improvement by means of cognitive enhancement: An intervention in children with special educational needs. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 352-361. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.12.032
Dole, J. A., Nokes, J. D., & Drits, D. (2009). 16 Cognitive strategy instruction. In S. E. Israel, & G. G. Duffy, (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 347-372). Routledge.
Ferrer, M. S., Sánchez-López, P., Soriano-Ayala, E., & Nievas-Cazorla, F. (2013). Instrucción en estrategias de comprensión lectora mediante enseñanza recíproca: Efectos del agrupamiento de los estudiantes [Instruction in reading comprehension strategies through reciprocal teaching: Effects of student grouping]. Anales de psicología, 29, 848-854. doi:10.6018/analesps.29.3.158401
Feuerstein, R., Falik, L. H., Feuerstein, S., Cagan, A., Yosef, L., & Volk, Z. (2012). Cognitive enhancement and rehabilitation for the elder population: application of the Feuerstein Instrumental Enrichment Program for the Elderly. Life Span and Disability, 15(2), 21-33.
García-Candel, J. A., Bernárdez-Gómez, A., & Belmonte-Almagro, M. L. (2024). Family perceptions about the methodology of the “we all are campus” training program. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 10(3), 387-396. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.10.3.387
Gutiérrez-Braojos, C., & Pérez, H. S. (2012). Estrategias de comprensión lectora: enseñanza y evaluación en educación primaria [Reading comprehension strategies: teaching and evaluation in primary education]. Profesorado. Revista de Curriculum y Formación de Profesorado, 16(1), 183-202.
Haddad, F. A. (2000). The Cognitive Assessment System, single case designs: Focus on reading fluency and accuracy. Paper presented at the meeting of the Arizona Association of School Psychologists, Arizona.
Haddad, F. A., Garcia, Y. E., Naglieri, J. A., Grimditch, M., McAndrews, A., & Eubanks, J. (2003). Planning facilitation and reading comprehension: Instructional relevance of the PASS theory. Journal of psychoeducational assessment, 21, 282-289. doi:10.1177/073428290302100304
Instituto Galego de Estatística. (2022). Enquisa estrutural a fogares: Ingresos dos fogares [Structural survey to households: Household income]. Author.
Jouini, K. (2005). Estrategias inferenciales en la comprensión lectora [Inferential strategies in reading comprehension]. Glosas didácticas. Revista electrónica internacional, 13(4), 95-114.
Juliana, J., & Pasaribu, S. (2023). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemahaman Siswa Melalui Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran PQ4R. Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 4(1), 222-227.
Kar, B. C., Dash, U. N., Das, J. P., & Carlson, J. (1993). Two experiments on the dynamic assessment of planning. Learning and individual differences, 5, 13-29. doi:10.1016/1041-6080(93)90023-L
Moreno, A. (2017). La mejora de la comprensión lectora [The improvement of reading comprehension]. In L. Carlos, (Ed.), La educación lingüística y literaria en la enseñanza secundaria (pp. 127-159). Horsori.
Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (2002). Practical implications of general intelligence and PASS cognitive processes. The general factor of intelligence: How general is it, 855-884.
Naglieri, J. A., & Gottling, S. H. (1997). Mathematics instruction and PASS cognitive processes an intervention study. Journal of learning disabilities, 30, 513-520. doi:10.1177/002221949703000507
Naglieri, J. A., & Johnson, D. (2000). Effectiveness of a cognitive strategy intervention in improving arithmetic computation based on the PASS theory. Journal of learning disabilities, 33, 591-597. doi:10.1177/002221940003300607
Neuenhaus, N., Grobe, F. B., Schoor, C., & Artelt, C. (2023). High-achieving ninth grade students’ self-reported strategy use and its relation to strategic reading behavior. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38(4), 1571-1591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00659-0
Palincsar, A. S. (2013). Reciprocal teaching. In J. Hattie & E.M. Anderman (Ed.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 369-371). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203850398
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (2009). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (2018). Transfer and teaching thinking. In D. N. Perkins, J. Lochhead & J. C. Bishop (Ed.), Thinking (pp. 285-303). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315802015
Puente, A., Jiménez, V., & Alvarado, J. M. (2009). ESCOLA: Escala de conciencia lectora [ESCOLA: Reading awareness scale]. EOS.
Sanahuja, A., Lago, J. R., Romay, M. D. P., & Miralles, M. (2024). Aprendizaje cooperativo como apoyo a la inclusión en un aula de 3. º de primaria: trabajo colaborativo del profesorado. Revista latinoamericana de educación inclusiva, 18(1), 105-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-73782024000100105
Sarimanah, E. (2016). Efectivenes of PQ4R metacognitive strategy based reading learning models in junior high school [Cooperative Learning as a Support for Inclusion in a 3rd Grade Classroom: Collaborative Teacher Work]. International journal of language education and culture review, 2, 74-81. doi:10.21009/IJLECR.021.08
Soriano-Ferrer, M., Soriano-Ferrer, E., Félix-Mateo, V., Arocas-Sanchís, E., & García-Valls, J. (2009). Enseñanza recíproca:¿incide la modalidad de agrupamiento de los alumnos sobre la autorregulación de la comprensión? [Reciprocal teaching: does the modality of grouping students affect self-regulation of understanding?]. Paper presented at the Congrés Internacional Virtual d’Educació CIVE 2009, Islas Baleares, ES.
Tofade, T., Elsner, J., & Haines, S. T. (2013). Best practice strategies for effective use of questions as a teaching tool. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 77(7), 155. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe777155
Torres-Soto, A., Bernárdez-Gómez, A., García Hernández, M. L., & Ares-Ferreirós, M. (2025). Diversity of students and their needs: What do teachers face in their professional development? International Journal of Educational Methodology, 11(2), 159-172. doi: 10.12973/ijem.11.2.159
Wagenmakers, E. J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 25, 58-76. doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7
Wagenmakers, E. J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 25, 35-57. doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2014). Educational psychology: A century of contributions: A Project of Division 15 (educational Psychology) of the American Psychological Society. Routledge.