Student Preferences for Educational Services in Open and Distance Learning: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach of Indonesia’s Open University (Universitas Terbuka)

Student Preferences for Educational Services in Open and Distance Learning: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach of Indonesia’s Open University (Universitas Terbuka)

Article Number: e2025229 | Available Online: May 2025 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.16.229

Mohamad Yunus , Ernik Yuliana , Heny Kurniawati

Full text PDF | 2198 | 1868

Abstract

Background/purpose. Improving student retention in open and distance education depends on understanding their preferences for the educational services provided. This study aimed to analyze students’ preferences for UT’s educational services to improve retention.

Materials/methods. This study employed a descriptive quantitative method. The research sample consisted of 208 students. The data were collected using questionnaires and interview methods. The data were analyzed using descriptive analysis and the structural equation model (SEM).

Results. The research results indicated that the students preferred printed teaching material highly; 88.5% of the respondents agreed and strongly agreed. For the tutorial service, the respondents strongly preferred online tutorials (83.6%) and course tasks (70.2%), while 45.7% preferred face-to-face tutorials and 47.1% webinar tutorials. The respondents had similar preferences for examination services between take-home examinations (THE) and offline written examinations; 77.9% said they were satisfied with the THE service, and 77.9% of respondents were also satisfied with offline written examinations. The result of the SEM analysis of the effect of student characteristics (X1), learning experience (X2), and participation in distance-learning success support service (X3) on the students’ preference for UT educational services, revealed that learning experience (X2) was the only variable influencing the students' preference for teaching material and online tutorial services with a t value exceeding 1.96 at t = 6.92, 8.52, and 7.04, respectively.

Conclusion. The conclusions of this study indicate that students’ preferences for educational services at Universitas Terbuka show that the majority prefer printed learning materials and online tutorials. In contrast, the learning experience significantly influences students’ preferences for learning materials and online tutorial services.

Keywords: Universitas Terbuka, open and distance learning, educational services

References

Ahmed, S., Tariq, K., & Abbas, F. (2024). Analyzing Data on Students’ Institutional Trust and Its Impact on Emotional Wellbeing. The Asian Bulletin of Big Data Management, 4(02), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.62019/abbdm.v4i02.181

Ali Sawand, F., Ali Chandio, B., Bilal, M., Rasheed, M. R., Ali Raza, M., & Ahmad, N. (2015). Quality Assessment in Higher Education. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 50, 162–171. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.50.162

Cabacang, G. S. (2021). Quality is never an accident: A survey on the total quality-management practices amongst selected higher education institutions in the philippines. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(10), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.26803/IJLTER.20.10.2

Calderone, S. M., & J. Fosnacht, K. (2023). Student Trust in Higher Education Institutions: How the Pandemic Influenced Undergraduate Trust. American Behavioral Scientist, 67(13), 1611–1631. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642221118263

Contrino, M. F., Reyes-Millán, M., Vázquez-Villegas, P., & Membrillo-Hernández, J. (2024). Using an adaptive learning tool to improve student performance and satisfaction in online and face-to-face education for a more personalized approach. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00292-y

David, L. (2015). Social Learning Theory Bandura Social Learning Theory. Learning Theories, October.

Deniz, Ü., & Erdener, M. A. (2023). Development and Validation of the Trust in Higher Education Scale (THES): A Mixed-Methods Approach. Participatory Educational Research, 10(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.41.10.3

Eliyasni, R., Kenedi, A. K., & Sayer, I. M. (2019). Blended Learning and Project Based Learning: The Method to Improve Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS). Jurnal Iqra’ : Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(2), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v4i2.549

Falloon, G. (2011). Making the connection: Moore’s theory of transactional distance and its relevance to the use of a virtual classroom in postgraduate online teacher education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782569

Ferdiansyah, S., & Angin, R. (2020). Thai Students’ Experiences of Online Learning at Indonesian Universities in the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Open Journals in Education, 10(S3), 58–74. https://ojed.org/jis

Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Shea, P., Pelz, W., & Swan, K. (2020). Student Satisfaction and Perceived Learning with On-line Courses: Principles and Examples from the SUNY Learning Network. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v4i2.1899

Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Gijselaers, W. (2014). A dynamic analysis of the interplay between asynchronous and synchronous communication in online learning: The impact of motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12020

Hariyanta, D., Hermanto, H., & Herwin, H. (2022). Distance Learning Management in Elementary Schools During the Pandemic. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 10(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v10i2.47712

Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous & Synchronous E-Learning. Educause Quarterly, 1(4), 51–55.

Islam, M. A., & Bag, S. (2020). ASSESSING SERVICE QUALITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A STUDY IN INDIAN PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES. Shodh Sanchar Bulletin, 10(36), 70–78. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346435991

Jaradat, S. A., & Ajlouni, A. O. (2020). Social presence and self-efficacy in relation to student satisfaction in online learning setting: A predictive study. International Journal of Education and Practice, 8(4), 759–773. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2020.84.759.773

Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505

Kaur, A. (2022). Online Teaching and Emotional Intelligence of School Instructors. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 2022(4), 10713–10717. http://journalppw.com

Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and Challenges for Teaching Successful Online Courses in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516661713

Koçak, S. (2021). Does social justice leadership in education improve the school belonging and resilience of students? Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 27(1), 1061–1084. https://doi.org/10.14527/kuey.2021.005

Kruger-Ross, M. J., & Waters, R. D. (2013). Predicting online learning success: Applying the situational theory of publics to the virtual classroom. Computers and Education, 61(1), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.015

Lindsey, N. S., & Rice, M. L. (2015). Interpersonal skills and education in the traditional and online classroom environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 13(3), 126–136.

Mansori, S., Vaz, A., & Ismail, Z. M. M. (2014). Service quality, satisfaction and student loyalty in Malaysian private education. Asian Social Science, 10(7), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n7p57

McLeod, S. (2016). Social Learning Theory Bandura Social Learning Theory. Learning Theories, October.

Moore, M. G. (1997). Theory of transactional distance. Routledge.

Moore, M. G. (2003). Handbook of Distance Education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 17(2), 73–75. http://www.distance-educator.com

Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? In Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education (Vol. 33, Issue 3, pp. 301–314). https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701293231

Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001

Setyaningrum, R. W., & Pangesti, F. (2020). Forced Remote Learning during the COVID-19 Outbreak: International Students’ Stories from a Bahasa Indonesia (the Indonesian Language) for Foreigners Classroom. Open Journal in Education, 10(S3), 180–197. https://ojed.org/jis

Sibagariang, P. P., & Pandia, W. S. S. (2021). Teaching Approach and Teacher Self-Efficacy during Early Childhood Distance Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini, 15(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpud.151.03

Sogolitappeh, F. N., Hedayat, A., Arjmand, M. R., & Khaledian, M. (2018). Investigate the Relationship between Spiritual Intelligence and Emotional Intelligence with Resilience in Undergraduate (BA) Students. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 82(Juni), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.82.10

Stankovska, G., Dimitrovski, D., Ibraimi, Z., & Memedi, I. (2021). Online Learning, Social Presence and Satisfaction among University Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Bulgarian Comparative Education Society (BCES), 19(1), 181–190.

Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x

Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers and Education, 50(4), 1183–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007

Sutiman, S., Sofyan, H., Soenarto, S., Mutohhari, F., & Nurtanto, M. (2022). Students’ Career Decision-Making During Online Learning: The Mediating Roles of Self-Efficacy in Vocational Education. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1669–1682. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1669

Wang, X., Chen, H., Liu, L., Liu, Y., Zhang, N., Sun, Z., Lou, Q., Ge, W., Hu, B., & Li, M. (2020). Anxiety and Sleep Problems of College Students During the Outbreak of COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11(585693), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.588693

Yusuf, F. A., & Fajari, L. E. W. (2022). Key Success Factors of Various Quality Assessment Institutions and Quality of Higher Education Services: A Meta-Analysis Study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2022(98), 184–202. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2022.98.012

Zaitun, Z., Rochmiyati, R., & Pargito, P. (2021). Assessment Online Learning At Elementary School. Edunesia : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2(3), 663–667. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v2i3.186

Zb, A., Novalian, D., Ananda, R., Habibi, M., & Sulman, F. (2021). Distance Learning With STEAM Approaches: Is Effect on the Cognitive Domain? Jurnal Educative: Journal of Educational Studies, 6(2), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.30983/educative.v6i2.4977

Announcement

EDUPIJ Citation Metrics

EDUPIJ News!