Abstract

Conclusion. Theoretically, this paper enriches our understanding of the notion of expressiveness within the embodied perspective of learning. It also underscores the potential of embodied learning designs, offering insights for educators to integrate expressive dimensions of full-body movement into their teaching practices.

Keywords: STEAM, embodied-design research, expressiveness, number sense

Abrahamson, D., & Sánchez-García, R. (2016). Learning is moving in new ways: The ecological dynamics of mathematics education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 203–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1143370

Björklund, C., Ekdahl, A.-L., & Runesson Kempe, U. (2021). Implementing a structural approach in preschool number activities. Principles of an intervention program reflected in learning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 23(1), 72–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1756027

Björklund, C., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Kullberg, A. (2020). Research on early childhood mathematics teaching and learning. ZDM, 52(4), 607–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01177-3

Bjørnebye, M. (2022). Full-body interaction in young children’s modelling of counting-based addition. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v27i2.149188

Bjørnebye, M., Helseth, A., & van Bommel, J. (2023). Aesthetics in embodied task design in mathematics. In P. Drijvers, C. Csapodi, H. Palmér, K. Gosztonyi, & E. Kónya (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME13) (pp. 2038–2045). Alfréd Rényi Institute of Mathematics and ERME. https://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-04430809v1/document

Bjørnebye, M., & Sigurjonsson, T. (2020). Young children’s cross-domain mapping of numerosity in path navigation. In M. Carlsen, I. Erfjord, & P. S. Hundeland (Eds.), Mathematics education in the early years: Results from the POEM4 conference, 2018 (pp. 109–126). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34776-5_7

Bjørnebye, M., & van Bommel, J. (2025). Expressiveness in an embodied learning activity in mathematics. In C. K. Skott, M. Blomhøj, A. Eckert, R. Elicer, R. Herheim, B. Kristinsdóttir, D.M. Larsen, G.A. Nortvedt, P. Nyström, J.Ö. Sigurjónsson, & A.L. Tamborg (Eds.), Interplay between research and teaching practice in mathematics education. Proceedings of NORMA24, The tenth Nordic Conference on Mathematics Education, Copenhagen, 2024 (pp. 88–95). Skrifter från Svensk förening för MatematikDidaktisk Forskning No. 19 http://matematikdidaktik.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/NORMA24-proceedings.pdf 

Bradley, K. (2021). The skillful analyst: Investigating, analyzing, and reflecting on movement behavior through embodied knowledge. In J. F. Tantia (Ed.), The art and science of embodied research design: Concept, methods and cases (pp. 128–139). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429429941-11

Bryl, K. (2021). The three pillars of movement observation and analysis: A brief introduction to the LMA, KMP and MPI. In J. F. Tantia (Ed.), The art and science of embodied research design: Concepts, methods and cases (pp. 101–112). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429429941-9

Budinski, N., Joksimović, J., Vučićević, D., & Lavicza, Z. (2022). Case study of a mathematical dance performance “Point has no parts”. European Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/12617

Caviola, S., Carey, E., Mammarella, I. C., & Szucs, D. (2017). Stress, time pressure, strategy selection and math anxiety in mathematics: A review of the literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(1488). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01488

Chalmers, C., Carter, M., Cooper, T., & Nason, R. (2017). Implementing “Big Ideas” to advance the teaching and learning of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9799-1

Colucci-Gray, L., Burnard, P., Trowsdale, J., Cooke, C. F., Davies, R., & Gray, D. S. (2017). Reviewing the potential and challenges of developing STEAM education through creative pedagogies for 21st learning: How can school curricula be broadened towards a more responsive, dynamic, and inclusive form of education? British Educational Research Association.

Dackermann, T., Fischer, U., Huber, S., Nuerk, H.-C., & Moeller, K. (2016). Training the equidistant principle of number line spacing. Cognitive Processing, 17(3), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-016-0763-8

Duijzer, C., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Veldhuis, M., Doorman, M., & Leseman, P. (2019). Embodied learning environments for graphing motion: A systematic literature review. Educational Psychology Review, 31(3), 597–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09471-7

Fenyvesi, K., Lehto, S., Brownell, C., Nasiakou, L., Lavicza, Z., & Kosola, R. (2019). Learning mathematical concepts as a whole-body experience: Connecting multiple intelligences, creativities and embodiments within the STEAM framework. In P. Burnard & L. Colucci-Gray (Eds.), Why science and art creativities matter (Vol. 18, pp. 300–336). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004421585_018

Gadanidis, G., Borba, M., Hughes, J., & Lacerda, H. (2016). Designing aesthetic experiences for young mathematicians: A model for mathematics education reform. International Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 6(2), 225–244.

Goldin-Meadow, S., Cook, S. W., & Mitchell, Z. A. (2009). Gesturing gives children new ideas about math. Psychological Science, 20(3), 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02297.x

Hackney, P. (2002). Making connections: Total body integration through Bartenieff fundamentals. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003078319

Hetherington, L., Hardman, M., Noakes, J., & Wegerif, R. (2018). Making the case for a material-dialogic approach to science education. Studies in Science Education, 54(2), 141–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2019.1598036

Hraste, M., De Giorgio, A., Jelaska, P. M., Padulo, J., & Granić, I. (2018). When mathematics meets physical activity in the school-aged child: The effect of an integrated motor and cognitive approach to learning geometry. PLoS One, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196024

Leandro, C. R., Monteiro, E., & Melo, F. (2018). Interdisciplinary working practices: can creative dance improve math? Research in Dance Education, 19(1), 74–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647893.2017.1354838

Mavilidi, M.-F., Okely, A., Chandler, P., Louise Domazet, S., & Paas, F. (2018). Immediate and delayed effects of integrating physical activity into preschool children’s learning of numeracy skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166, 502–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.09.009

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6

McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2014). Educational design research. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 131–140). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_11

Moore, C.-L., & Yamamoto, K. (2012). Beyond words: Movement observation and analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203806074

Mullender-Wijnsma, M. J., Hartman, E., de Greeff, J. W., Doolaard, S., Bosker, R. J., & Visscher, C. (2016). Physically active math and language lessons improve academic achievement: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics, 137(3). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-2743

Nathan, M. J., & Alibali, M. W. (2021). An embodied theory of transfer of mathematical learning. In C. Hohensee & J. Lobato (Eds.), Transfer of learning: Progressive perspectives for mathematics education and related fields (pp. 27–58). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65632-4_2

NESH. (2016). Guidelines for research ethics. Oslo: The National Committee for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities, Law and Theology. Retrieved from https://www.forskningsetikk.no/en/guidelines/social-sciences-and-humanities/

Newen, A., Gallagher, S., & De Bruin, L. (2018). 4E cognition: Historical roots, key concepts, and central issues. In A. Newen, L. De Bruin, & S. Gallagher (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition (pp. 1–16). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.013.1

Novack, M. A., Congdon, E. L., Hemani-Lopez, N., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2014). From action to abstraction: Using the hands to learn math. Psychological Science, 25(4), 903–910. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613518351

Paniagua, A., & Istance, D. (2018). Teachers as designers of learning environments: The importance of innovative pedagogies. Educational Research and Innovation. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264085374-en

Parsley, J., & Soriano, C. T. (2009). Understanding geometry in the dance studio. Journal of Mathematics and the Arts, 3(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513470902864262

Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(4), 405–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2003.09.002

Radford, L., Arzarello, F., Edwards, L., & Sabena, C. (2017). The multimodal material mind: Embodiment in mathematics education. In J. Cai (Ed.), First compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 700–721). NCTM.

Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3

Riley, N., Lubans, D., Holmes, K., Hansen, V., Gore, J., & Morgan, P. (2017). Movement-based mathematics: Enjoyment and engagement without compromising learning through the EASY minds program. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 1653–1673. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00690a

Roth, W.-M. (2011). Geometry as objective science in elementary school classrooms: Mathematics in the flesh (Vol. 27). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203817872

Ruiter, M., Loyens, S., & Paas, F. (2015). Watch your step children! Learning two-digit numbers through mirror-based observation of self-initiated body movements. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9324-4

Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203883785

Shapiro, L., & Stolz, S. (2019). Embodied cognition and its significance for education. Theory and Research in Education, 17, 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878518822149

Sinclair, N. (2004). The roles of the aesthetic in mathematical inquiry. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(3), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0603_1

Sinclair, N. (2024). Knowing as remembering: Methodological experiments in embodied experiences of number. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 10(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-023-00132-7

Sinclair, N., Chorney, S., & Rodney, S. (2016). Rhythm in number: Exploring the affective, social and mathematical dimensions of using TouchCounts. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0154-y

Skulmowski, A., & Rey, G. D. (2018). Embodied learning: Introducing a taxonomy based on bodily engagement and task integration. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0092-9

Tantia, J. F. (2021). The body-focused interview: Explicating the implicit in embodied research. In J. F. Tantia (Ed.), The art and science of embodied research design: Concepts, methods and cases (pp. 165–175). Routledge. 

Wahl, C. (2019). Laban/Bartenieff movement studies: Contemporary applications. Human Kinetics.

Whitacre, I., Hohensee, C., & Nemirovksy, R. (2009). Expressiveness and mathematics learning. In W.-M. Roth (Ed.), Mathematical representation at the interface of body and culture (pp. 275–308). Information Age Publishing.

Wood, K. (2008). Mathematics through movement: An investigation of the links between kinaesthetic and conceptual learning. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 13(1), 18–22. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ793993.pdf