Abstract

Conclusion. The integration of scaffolding within the PBL framework substantially improves students' problem-solving skills, especially in heterogeneous classrooms. This approach offers a practical model for differentiated instruction that meets the needs of students across diverse prior knowledge levels.

Keywords: Problem-Based Learning, scaffolding, psychological tools, problem-solving skills, prior knowledge levels, mathematics, cognitive load.

Abiodun, T. O., Aderibigbe, O. O., Adebola, I. S., & Ayoola, A. A. (2024). Effects of Heuristic Problem-Solving strategies on students’ achievement and retention in Mathematics in Ogun State, Nigeria. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 12(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol12.1.1.2024

Al Mamun, M. A., & Lawrie, G. (2024). Cognitive presence in learner–content interaction process: The role of scaffolding in online self-regulated learning environments. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(3), 791–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00279-7

Andersen, R., Mørch, A. I., & Litherland, K. T. (2022). Collaborative learning with block-based programming: investigating human-centered artificial intelligence in education. Behaviour and Information Technology, 41(9), 1830–1847. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2083981

Anggraini, V. H. (2023). Mathematical Misconceptions of 7th Grade Students on Geometry Problem Using Three-tier Diagnostic Test. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2569. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0112357

Atman Uslu, N., Yildiz Durak, H., & Gökçe Mehmet, A. Y. (2022). Comparing reflective and supportive scaffolding in 3D computer-aided design course: Engineering students’ metacognitive strategies, spatial ability self-efficacy, and spatial anxiety. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(5), 1454–1469. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22531

Ballon, E. M. M., Gomez, F. L. R., Castro, A. E. L. F., & Linares, M. R. F. C. (2024). Evaluating problem-solving and procedural skills offirst-year students in a Peruvian higher education institution. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14154

Barile, L. (2024). ‘Effective strategies’ for teaching mathematics in economics: testing prior knowledge, scaffolding and practical applications. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 43(4), 430–448. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrae022

Borthick, A. F., & Schneider, G. P. (2023). Getting Students Ready for Accounting Spreadsheets: Training for Basic Spreadsheet Skills with Pre/Post Assessments. Issues in Accounting Education, 38(2), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.2308/ISSUES-2021-010

Cai, J., & Rott, B. (2024). On understanding mathematical problem-posing processes. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 56(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01536-w

Chang, C. C., & Yang, S. T. (2023). Interactive effects of scaffolding digital game-based learning and cognitive style on adult learners’ emotion, cognitive load and learning performance. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00385-7

Chang, C. C., & Yang, S. T. (2024). Learners’ positive and negative emotion, various cognitive processing, and cognitive effectiveness and efficiency in situated task-centered digital game-based learning with different scaffolds. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(9), 5058–5077. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2209600

Chen, Y. C., Hou, H. T., & Wu, C. H. (2023). Design and Development of a Scaffolding-Based Mindtool for Gamified Learning Classrooms. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221101081

Choudhar, S., Bi, N., Singh, P. N., & Talwar, M. P. (2022). Study on Problem Solving Skills and Its Importance. World Journal of English Language, 12(3), 47. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n3p47

Deibl, I., Zumbach, J., & Fleischer, T. (2023). Visualization and metacognitive scaffolding in learning from animations. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100601. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100601

Dewi, N. R., Ardiansyah, A. S., & Amidi. (2023). Analysis of mathematical problem solving ability based on students’ mathematical prior knowledge in ICT-assisted preprospec learning model. International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Education, ICMSE 2021, 040083. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0125830

Efuansyah, E., Lukito, A., & Wijayanti, P. (2024). Utilizing task with scaffolding: growth of students’ mathematical understanding from layers of image having to property noticing. Perspectives of Science and Education, 70(4), 382–395. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2024.4.24

Erman, E., Pare, B., Susiyawati, E., Martini, M., & Subekti, H. (2022). Using Scaffolding Set to Help Student Addressing Socio-Scientific Issues in Biochemistry Classes. International Journal of Instruction, 15(4), 871–888. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15447a

Fensie, A., Pierre, T. S., Jain, J., & Sezen-Barrie, A. (2024a). Engaged learning during distraction: a case study of successful working moms in distance education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 36(2), 389–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09359-0

Fensie, A., Pierre, T. S., Jain, J., & Sezen-Barrie, A. (2024b). Engaged learning during distraction: a case study of successful working moms in distance education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 36(2), 389–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09359-0

Fisher, D., Dahlan, J. A., & Putra, B. Y. G. (2022). MATHEMATICAL SELF-ESTEEM ABILITY OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN PROJECT-BASED LEARNING. Infinity Journal, 11(2), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v11i2.p273-284

Ghadiri, S., Tajeddin, Z., & Alemi, M. (2024). Teachers’ Means of Scaffolding L2 Learners’ Pragmatic Production in Online Instruction. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2024.54755.2550

Handayanto, S. K., Fawaiz, S., & Taufiq, A. (2024). USING E-SCAFFOLDING TO DEVELOP STUDENTS’ SCIENTIFIC REASONING THROUGH INQUIRY-BASED LEARNING. Obrazovanie i Nauka, 26(3), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2024-3082

Heitzmann, N., Stadler, M., Richters, C., Radkowitsch, A., Schmidmaier, R., Weidenbusch, M., & Fischer, M. R. (2023). Learners’ adjustment strategies following impasses in simulations - Effects of prior knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 83, 101632. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101632

Hockham, D., & Wallis, J. (2024). Operationalising the concept of recontextualisation: leveraging pedagogy and learning strategies in higher education practical courses. Higher Education, 88(2), 645–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01136-3

Hwang, G. J., Chiu, M. C., Hsia, L. H., & Chu, H. C. (2023). Promoting art appreciation performances and behaviors in effective and joyful contexts: A two-tier test-based digital gaming approach. Computers & Education, 194, 104706. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104706

Jung, J., Shin, Y., Chung, H., & Fanguy, M. (2024). The effects of pre-training types on cognitive load, self-efficacy, and problem-solving in computer programming. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-024-09407-3

Karla, D., Pandey, V. K., Rastogi, P., & Kumar, S. (2022). A Comprehensive Review on Significance of Problem-Solving Abilities in Workplace. World Journal of English Language, 12(3), 88. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n3p88

Kim, P. W. (2024). A Framework to Overcome the Dark Side of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) Like ChatGPT in Social Media and Education. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 11(4), 5266–5274. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2023.3315237

Kusmaryono, I., & Kusumaningsih, W. (2021). Construction of students’ mathematical knowledge in the zone of proximal development and zone of potential construction. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.341

Lamsombat, K., & Kanjug, I. (2021). A Study of Learner’s Scientific Thinking Using Constructivist Virtual Learning Environment for Grade 11 Students. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 13117 LNCS, 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91540-7_11

Lataifeh, M., Carrasco, X. A., Elnagar, A. M., Ahmed, N., & Junejo, I. (2024). Human–machine co-creation: a complementary cognitive approach to creative character design process using GANs. Journal of Supercomputing, 80(11), 16574–16610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-024-06083-z

Lin, Y. C., Chien, S. Y., & Hou, H. T. (2024). A multi-dimensional scaffolding-based virtual reality educational board game design framework for service skills training. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13243-4

Machmud, M. T., Wattanachai, S., & Samat, C. (2023). Constructivist gamification environment model designing framework to improve ill-structured problem solving in learning sciences. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(6), 2413–2429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10279-0

Mahan, K. R. (2022). The comprehending teacher: scaffolding in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Language Learning Journal, 50(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1705879

Manalo, E., & Fukuda, M. (2021). Diagrams in Essays: Exploring the Kinds of Diagrams Students Generate and How Well They Work. 12th International Conference on the Theory and Application of Diagrams, Diagrams 2021, 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86062-2_56

Mustafa, S., Riana, R., Baharullah, B., & Maming, K. (2024). The Collaboration of Teaching at the Right Level Approach with Problem-Based Learning Model. Open Education Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2024-0046

Nazerian, S., Abbasian, G. R., & Mohseni, A. (2021). Measurement and incorporation of ZPD scenarios in developing writing accuracy in EFL classes. Cogent Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1968735

Nocera Alves Junior, P., Leger, P., & Costa Melo, I. (2024). Efficiency analysis of engineering classes: A DEA approach encompassing active learning and expositive classes towards quality education. Environmental Science and Policy, 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103856

Nunthaitaweekul, P., Chaijaroen, S., & Gamlunglert, R. (2021). Development of Constructivist Web-Based Learning Environment Model to Enhance Critical Thinking: Integration Between Pedagogy and Neuroscience Topic on Substance for Primary Students. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 13117 LNCS, 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91540-7_24

OECD. (2024). PISA 2022 Technical Report. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2022-technical-report_01820d6d-en

Phuong, V. T. (2023). The effects of instructional scaffolding for writing skill of English majored students. Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania, 64(4), 158–169. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2023.4.10

Puntambekar, S. (2022). Distributed Scaffolding: Scaffolding Students in Classroom Environments. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09636-3

Qin, L. (2022). The “wrong Love” between the Zone of Proximal Development and Scaffolding: An Interview with Prof. James P. Lantolf. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 45(1), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1515/CJAL-2022-0110

Rahmawati, Y., Afrizal, A., Astari, D. D., Mardiah, A., Utami, D. B., & Muhab, S. (2021). The integration of dilemmas stories with stem-project-based learning: Analyzing students’ thinking skills using hess’ cognitive rigor matrix. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(2), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1292

Rohde Poole, S. B. (2024). Designing Mini Modeling Projects. PRIMUS, 34(9), 925–940. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2024.2387171

Sirimathep, K., Kanjug, I., Samat, C., & Wattanachai, S. (2022). The Design and Development of the Mobile Based Learning Environment to Enhance Computational Problem Solving in Programming for High School Students. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 13449 LNCS, 491–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15273-3_54

Song, Y., Roohr, K. C., & Kirova, D. (2024). Exploring approaches for developing and evaluating workplace critical thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101460

Thomas, G. L., Bailey, J., & Engeness, I. (2023). Scaffolding athlete learning in preparation for competition: what matters. Sports Coaching Review, 12(3), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/21640629.2021.1991713

Toplak, M. E., & Flora, D. B. (2021). Resistance to cognitive biases: Longitudinal trajectories and associations with cognitive abilities and academic achievement across development. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 34(3), 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2214

Valdez, F. A. O., & Taganap, E. C. (2024). Error Analysis of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers in Solving Verbal Problems. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 16(4), 6–34. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85209757088&partnerID=40&md5=e0eb1ade8037bd4730acd48c66bf5f2e

Wang, F., Huang, J., Zheng, X. L., Wu, J. Q., & Zhao, A. P. (2024). STEM activities for boosting pupils' computational thinking and reducing cognitive load: argumentation scaffolding and mental rotation roles. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2024.2398504

Wang, H. C., & Hsiao, C. H. (2022). EFFECTS OF ADVANCE ORGANIZERS ON TAIWANESE MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS’ ENGLISH-VIDEO LISTENING COMPREHENSION. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 19(2), 107–144. https://doi.org/10.30397/TJTESOL.202210_19(2).0004

Wang, Q., Peng, Y., & Wang, H. (2022). A Curation Activity-Based Self-Regulated Learning Promotion Approach as Scaffolding to Improving Learners’ Performance in STEM Courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(4), 843–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211056532

Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Johnson, N. C., Ing, M., & Zimmerman, J. (2023). Learning through explaining and engaging with others’ mathematical ideas. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 25(4), 438–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2021.1990744

Wijayanti, A., & Yanto, A. (2023). Pembelajaran Matematika Menyenangkan di SD Melalui Permainan. Polinomial : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.56916/jp.v2i1.316

Wijayanti, K. (2023). Students’ Mathematical Creative Thinking Obstacle and Scaffolding in Solving Derivative Problems. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(17), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i17.6540

Ye, L., Wang, R., & Zhao, J. (2021). Enhancing Learning Performance and Motivation of Cultural Heritage Using Serious Games. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 287–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120963828

Ye, Y., & Kaplan-Rakowski, R. (2024). An exploratory study on practising listening comprehension skills in high-immersion virtual reality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(4), 1651–1672. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13481

Yennita, Y. (2021). Problem-based learning (PBL) and blended learning in improving critical thinking skills and student learning activities in biochemistry courses. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1731, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1731/1/012007

Zentgraf, K., & Prediger, S. (2024). Demands and scaffolds for explaining the connection of multiple representations: Revisiting the bottle-filling task. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 73, 101118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101118

Zhang, C., & Jia, B. (2024). Enriching STEAM education with visual art: education benefits, teaching examples, and trends. Discover Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00354-w

Zhu, C., Klapwijk, R., Silva-Ordaz, M., Spandaw, J., & de Vries, M. J. (2024). Investigating the role of spatial thinking in children’s design ideation through an open-ended design-by-analogy challenge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 34(5), 1733–1762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09877-7