Volume 23 (2026) - In progress
When Stories Get a Visual Voice: AI-Generated Images, a Visual Pedagogy for Enhancing Student Engagement and Critical Analysis in World Literature
Article Number: e2025416 | Available Online: September 2025 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.18.416
Nusaibah Dakamsih , Mo’tasim-Bellah Alshunnag , Azel Alkayid
Full text PDF |
2220 |
2098
Abstract
|
Background/Purpose: This study investigates the pedagogical potential of AI-generated images to enhance student engagement and critical analysis in world literature curricula. Grounded in Reader-Response Theory, it explores how algorithmic visuals impact student interpretation, addressing a gap in understanding technology's role in fostering aesthetic literacy. Materials/Methods: A mixed-method approach was employed in an undergraduate literature course using surveys (N=30) and educator interviews. Students engaged in short stories (e.g., Kafka, Hemingway) accompanied by AI-generated images (Midjourney v5.2). Questionnaires measured emotional/intellectual engagement, and open-ended responses captured interpretive reasoning. Data were analyzed via ANOVA and thematic coding (NVivo14). Results: AI images significantly boosted student emotional engagement (+22%, *p*<0.01), effectively hooking reluctant readers. However, interpretive diversity decreased (3 vs. 9 thematic variants in control groups), potentially narrowing critical thinking. Disparities emerged: women engaged more with symbolic visuals (77.4% emotional connection), while men preferred literal depictions (69.8% analytical focus). AI's cultural biases were identified as a teachable moment for digital literacy by 28% of participants. |
Conclusion: AI visuals deepen student-text interactions but risk homogenizing interpretation. The study highlights AI’s value as a scaffolded pedagogical tool for differentiating instruction, advocating for ethical prompt-crafting exercises to teach algorithmic bias and preserve hermeneutic openness. Findings urge interdisciplinary collaboration to harness AI's capacity for enriching literary learning.
Keywords: AI-generated images, Reader-Response Theory, Digital Literacy Visual Learning, Literature Pedagogy, visual narrative
ReferencesAl-Kayed, A. H. S., & Eid, A. J. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on the production of 2D stop-motion films. Language Contexts and Interdisciplinary Studies - Fayoum University, 9(3), 45-67.
Awkasi, S. (2023). Critique of reader response: Cognitive background and term problematique. Reader's Journal of Literary, Critical and Linguistic Studies, 2(6), 112-130.
Aycock, J. (2019). Kafka illustrated: Visual interpretations of literary modernism. Cambridge University Press.
Bart, R. (1993). Introduction to structural analysis of narratives (2nd ed.). Centre for Urban Development.
Barthes, R. (1977). Image—music—text (S. Heath, Trans.). Hill and Wang. (Original work published 1968)
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610-623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
Boden, M. A. (2018). Artificial intelligence and creativity. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-w001-1
Bridy, A. (2020). Coding creativity: Copyright and the artificially intelligent author. Columbia Law Review, 120(5), 1245-1288. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/5ru6m
Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.
Elgammal, A., Liu, B., Elhoseiny, M., & Mazzone, M. (2022). Artificial intelligence and the creative process. Nature Machine Intelligence, 4(3), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00452-0
Fathiya, R. (2022). The very short story: Narrative techniques and critical approaches. Dar Al-Maarif.
Guha, T., Alshammari, N., & Birhane, A. (2023). Screening protocols for emotionally triggering AI content. Journal of Responsible Technology, 15(2), 100-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2023.100118
Gadamer, H.-G. (2013). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans., 2nd ed.). Bloomsbury. (Original work published 1960)
Hemingway, E. (1925). For sale: Baby shoes, never worn. In The complete short stories of Ernest Hemingway (1995 ed., p. 112). Scribner.
Hussein, M. (2022). Arab literary visual tropes in the AI era. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 16(4). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/16/4/000654/000654.html
Kaide, E. (2024). AI and artistic truth: Philosophical perspectives. MIT Press.
Kafka, F. (2020). The trees (J. Smith, Trans.). In The complete short stories (pp. 45-46). W. W. Norton. (Original work published 1914)
Lee, Y., & Hsu, W. (2023). AI versus human literary illustration: A comparative study of reader responses. Poetics Today, 44(1), 89-112. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-10242415
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
McCloud, S. (1993). Understanding comics: The invisible art. Harper Perennial
Oqasi, A. (2023). Contemporary literary criticism: Theories and applications. Dar Al-Kitab Al-Jadid.
Riedl, M. (2023). Prompt engineering as creative practice. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 17(2). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/17/2/000589/000589.html
Risam, R. (2022). New digital worlds: Postcolonial digital humanities in theory, praxis, and pedagogy. Northwestern University Press.
Saidi, H. (2024). Reader-response theory in the digital age. Oxford University Press.
Shuaib, M. (2020). The imagination in literary creation. Beirut Academic Press.
Tompkins, J. P. (2023). Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism (2nd ed.). Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.56021/9781421444822
Zhang, L., Chen, W., & Park, S. (2024). Reader responses to AI-generated book covers: An empirical study. Publishing Research Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-024-09974-4
EDUPIJ Citation Metrics
EDUPIJ News!