Volume 18 (2025) Download Cover Page

Harnessing AI in School Counselling: Exploring the Potential of ChatGPT for Student Support

Article Number: e2025434  |  Available Online: September 2025  |  DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.18.434

Ahmad Al-shraifin , Yousef Wardat , Rommel AlAli , Khaled Al-Saud

Abstract

Background/purpose. This study explores the extent to which ChatGPT, an AI-powered large language model, can support school counseling services in addressing students’ academic, social, and emotional needs, considering student AI literacy and adoption. It investigates ChatGPT’s role in assisting counselors, delivering personalized guidance, ensuring 24/7 availability, and addressing ethical considerations.

Materials/Methods. For evaluating its effectiveness in school counseling, the study employed ChatGPT for role-play simulations of interactions and analysis of the literature already published on AI in education. Based on studies concerning technology use in education, the scope of the study included five crucial areas: response time, counselor assistance, tailored student support, ethics, and engagement dimensions, AI literacy, and adoption hurdles.

Results. As the study has shown, ChatGPT is capable of providing students tailored recommendations and streamlining office tasks so that the counselors can devote themselves to more complex tasks. Immediate support, especially during times of crisis, is also provided through the AI model’s round-the-clock availability. However, effective use depends on students’ AI literacy, with training needed to improve prompt engineering skills, and adoption requires user-friendly interfaces and awareness campaigns. Limitations include potential biases in AI responses, data privacy risks, and the necessity for human oversight to maintain empathetic, individualized care.

Conclusion. ChatGPT offers significant potential as a supplementary tool in school counseling, enhancing efficiency and accessibility. By addressing student AI literacy and adoption barriers through training and clear communication, its impact can be optimized. However, ethical challenges, including privacy and bias, require careful management. Human counselors remain essential for nuanced, empathetic support. Future research should investigate long-term impacts and establish ethical guidelines for AI integration in educational settings.

Keywords: School counseling, ChatGPT, innovative solutions, large language models

References

Adediran, G. A. (1995). Handbook of guidance and counselling. Iretiolu Publishers.

Adesope, O., & Ma, W. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 14(1), 141–154.

Al-Mseidin, K. I. (2023). Post-pandemic readjustment to traditional education system: Analyzing difficulties of university students and recommendations. International Journal of Childhood, Counselling, and Special Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.31559/CCSE2023.5.1.1

American School Counselor Association. (2016). Ethical standards for school counselors. American School Counselor Association.

Auger, R. (2006). Delivering difficult news to parents: Guidelines for school counselors. Professional School Counseling, 10(2), 139–145.

Aydin, N. G. (2011). A national study: School counselor involvement in school, family, and community partnerships with linguistically diverse families (Publication No. 1081478176) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Full Text.

Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In J. A. Larusson & B. White (Eds.), Learning analytics (pp. 61–75). Springer.

Federal Ministry of Education. (2005). Blueprint for Guidance and Counselling in Educational Institutions in Nigeria. Federal Ministry of Education.

Deb, S., Kumar, A., Holden, G. W., & Rowe, L. S. (2017). School corporal punishment, family tension, and students’ internalizing problems: Evidence from India. School Psychology International, 38(1), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034316681378

Fang, X., Zhang, J., & Liu, Z. (2003). Characteristics of parent-adolescent conflicts during adolescence. Psychological Development and Education, 3, 46–52.

Fitzpatrick, K. K., Darcy, A., & Vierhile, M. (2017). Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): A randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mental Health, 4(2), e19. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.7785

Ghaith, S. M., Banat, S. M., Hamad, G. E., & Albadareen, G. S. (2012). Jordanian school counselor involvement in school-family-community partnerships. International Journal for the Advancement of Counseling, 34(4), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-012-9159-3

He, X., Luo, C., Gao, X., Lu, J., Jin, X., Ruan, Z., & Gao, C. (2020). Research on the application of artificial intelligence in the field of psychophysiology. In X. Zhang, X. Chen, & T. Shu (Eds.), Blue book of artificial intelligence: China’s medical artificial intelligence development report 2020 (pp. 280–297). Social Sciences Academic Press.

Jiang, L., Tian, X., Ren, P., & Luo, F. (2022). A new mental health assessment is being assisted by artificial intelligence. Advances in Psychological Science, 30(1), 157–167.

Liu, C., Zhang, J., & Wang, M. (2023). The application of ChatGPT-based AI technology in the field of campus psychological counseling. Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research3, 113–120. https://doi.org/10.62051/8a831a77

Liu, H., Tian, L., Wang, S., & Zhang, W. (2011). Father-child and mother-child relationships and their effects on depression in adolescents. Psychological Science, 34(6), 1403–1408.

Liu, Y., & Fan, F. (2023). Research on identifying and managing user risk perception dimensions of ChatGPT-AIGC: Exploratory analysis based on grounded theory. Information Theory and Practice, 1–13.

Lu, J., & Law, N. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 14(1), 127–140.

Pardo, A., & Siemens, G. (2021). Ethical and privacy considerations for learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 2022–2034.

Rupani, P., Haughey, N., & Cooper, M. (2012). The impact of school-based counseling on young people’s capacity to study and learn. British Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 40(5), 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2012.718733

Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2015). Interpretative phenomenological analysis as a useful methodology for research on the lived experience of pain. British Journal of Pain, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2049463714541642

Song, Y. (2023). Digital intelligence psychology: Opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence enabling mental health. Global Journal of Media Studies, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.26599/GJMS.2023.9330025.

Storrie, K., Ahern, K., & Tuckett, A. (2010). A systematic review: Students with mental health problems: A growing problem. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172x.2009.01813.x

Vossler, A., & Moller, N. (2015). We argue a lot and don’t talk with each other: How distressed are families when seeking Relate family counseling? Counseling and Psychotherapy Research, 15(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12013

Walker, J. M., Susan, S., & Hoover-Dempsey, K. V. (2010). Why do parents become involved in their children’s education? Implications for school counselors. Professional School Counseling, 14(1), 27–41.

Wang, M., & Zhang, W. (2007). Developmental characteristics of parent-adolescent conflict and parent-adolescent attachment during adolescence. Psychological Science, 30(5), 1196–1198.

Wang, Y., Li, Y., & Li, Y. (2021). Challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence in higher education: A China case study. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 14(1), 1–14.

Wilder, C., & Ray, D. (2013). Parent preferences for secondary school counselor activities. Journal of Professional Counseling: Practice, Theory and Research, 41(1), 12–24.