Educational Transmission of Neo-Confucian Thought in 18th-Century Vietnam: The Pedagogical Legacy of Le Quy Don
Article Number: e2025475 | Available Online: September 2025 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.18.475
Tran Thi Binh , Le Thi Thanh Tam
Full text PDF |
1656 |
2053
Abstract
|
Background/Purpose. While Neo-Confucianism has been widely studied as a philosophical and political tradition, its educational implications in Vietnamese history remain underexplored. This study examines the pedagogical legacy of Lê Quý Đôn, an 18th-century Vietnamese scholar, with a focus on how his writings and institutional roles reflect Confucian educational principles. The research aims to bridge the gap between historical scholarship and educational theory by analyzing the transmission of moral and civic values through Confucian pedagogy. Materials/methods. The study adopts a qualitative and interpretive approach using document analysis. Primary sources include Lê Quý Đôn’s philosophical texts and historical records from the Quốc Tử Giám. The data were analyzed thematically through the lens of moral development theory, citizenship education, and Confucian pedagogy. Coding procedures and interpretive synthesis were employed to identify educational patterns and implicit curricular values. Results. The findings reveal that Lê Quý Đôn promoted a model of education centered on ethical self-cultivation, scholarly discipline, and meritocratic advancement. His writings emphasize the role of education in shaping moral character and civic responsibility. The study identifies key pedagogical elements such as hierarchical learning, values-based instruction, and curriculum leadership embedded in his work and practice. Conclusion. Lê Quý Đôn’s educational philosophy offers a localized framework for understanding Confucian pedagogy in Vietnamese history. His integration of moral education and institutional reform provides valuable insights for contemporary discussions on character education and educational leadership. Future research may explore comparative studies with other East Asian educators or apply his principles to modern citizenship curricula. |
Keywords: Le Quy Don, Confucian pedagogy, moral education, imperial examinations, educational leadership, Vietnamese educational history
ReferencesAnh, D. D. (2018). The history of Vietnam from its origins to the 19th century. Hanoi: National Culture Publishing House.
Blocker, H. G., & Starling, C. L. (2001). Japanese philosophy. New York, NY: SUNY Press.
Can, B. H. (1985). Le Quy Don. Hanoi: Culture Publishing House.
Chinh, D. (Ed.). (2015). History of Eastern philosophy. Hanoi: National Political Publishing House – Truth.
Chu, P. H. (2014a). Lịch triều hiến chương loại chí. Vol. 1: Dư địa chí [Classified records of the institutions of successive dynasties – Treatise on geography]. Ho Chi Minh City: Tre Publishing House.
Chu, P. H. (2014b). Lịch triều hiến chương loại chí. Vol. 2: Nhân vật chí [Classified records of the institutions of successive dynasties – Biographies of notable figures]. Ho Chi Minh City: Tre Publishing House.
Don, L. Q. (1995). Quần thu khảo biện [Textual investigations and critical debates of the classics]. Hanoi: Social Sciences Publishing House.
Don, L. Q. (2006). Vân Đài loại ngữ [Classified discourses from the Vân Đài Pavilion]. Hanoi: Culture and Information Publishing House.
Don, L. Q. (2007). Phủ biên tạp lục [Miscellaneous records on the pacification of the frontier regions]. Hanoi: Culture and Information Publishing House.
Don, L. Q. (2013a). Đại Việt thông sử [The comprehensive history of Dai Viet]. Ho Chi Minh City: Tre Publishing House.
Don, L. Q. (2013b). Kiến văn tiểu lục. Vol. 1 [A small record of things seen and heard]. Ho Chi Minh City: Tre Publishing House.
Don, L. Q. (2014). Thư kinh diễn nghĩa [Interpretative commentary on the Book of Documents]. Hanoi: Culture and Information Publishing House.
Huang, S., & Huang, X. (1999). Essentials of Neo-Confucianism: Eight major philosophers of the Song and Ming periods. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Institute for Han-Nom Studies. (1991). The continued chronicles of Dai Viet. Hanoi: Social Sciences Publishing House.
Kim, S. H. (2020). A comparative study of the political thoughts of Le Quy Don and Jeong Yak Yong (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Academy of Social Sciences, Hanoi.
Minh, H. T. (1998). Le Quy Don: A Vietnamese thinker of the 18th century. Hanoi: Education Publishing House.
Moral, A. (2002). Civil liberties and Confucianism. Philosophy East and West, 52(3), 281–310.
Ngan, L. K. (1974). Vietnamese political culture: The political system of Vietnam in the 17th and 18th centuries. Saigon: Faculty of Social Sciences, Van Hanh University.
Nhan, N. T. (2005). Chinese Confucianism. Hanoi: Culture and Information Publishing House.
Thanh, T. V. (1966). Dictionary of idioms, allusions, and famous figures. Vol. 1. Saigon: Hồn Thiêng Publishing House.
Thu, N. T. (2020). Confucianism and the history of Vietnamese thought. Hanoi: University of Education Publishing House.
Thu, N. T. (Ed.). (2019). History of Vietnamese thought (Vol. 1). Hanoi: University of Education Publishing House.
Van, L. M. (2022). Le Quy Don and Jeong Yak Yong: From annotating the Book of Documents to political thought. Hanoi: Vietnam National University Publishing House.
Vuong, T. N. (2008). The dual power system of the Le–Trinh period and its consequences. Journal of Philosophy, (September), 1–15.
Vy, D. C. (2012). Historian Le Quy Don. Hanoi: Culture and Information Publishing House.