Mathematics Students' Common Mistakes in Master Thesis at lmam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (lAU) in the Light of an Analysis of Its Content and Faculty Members' Perspective
Article Number: e2025479 | Available Online: September 2025 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.18.479
Mansour Saleh Alabdulaziz
Full text PDF |
1288 |
785
Abstract
|
Background/purpose. This study aimed to identify common mistakes made in master's theses on mathematics education by Saudi mathematics students at lAU in Saudi Arabia, as determined through a content analysis, and to compare these with the views of faculty members. Materials/methods. A descriptive approach (analytical and survey) was employed. The sample consisted of 52 master's theses and 16 faculty members who supervised and discussed mathematics education master's theses. Two tools were used to collect data: a Content Analysis Card and a questionnaire administered to faculty members. Results. Using content analysis, 71 mistakes were identified: 62 uncommon mistakes, 1 fairly common mistake, and 8 extremely common mistakes (the findings indicate that master students in the field of mathematics find it challenging to write an introduction, literature review, and thesis results and discussion sections). In addition, according to faculty members, there were 63 uncommon mistakes, 1 fairly common mistake, 6 common mistakes and 5 very common mistakes (An intriguing finding is that the very common type of mistake was literature review, and also interestingly shows that mistakes were commonly made with the method section, thesis results and discussion sections). Moreover, the results revealed a statistically significant correlation (p < 0.05) between the content analysis of common mistakes in master's theses specializing in mathematics education at IAU and the views of faculty members. It is interesting to note that, based on an analysis of their content and faculty members' perspectives, the most common mistakes in master's theses were found in the "literature review" and "thesis results and discussion" sections. |
Conclusion. Based on the findings, several recommendations and suggestions are presented.
Keywords: Common mistakes, master thesis, mathematics education, IAU
ReferencesAbbas, M., Nofal, M., Al-Absi, M., & Abu Awwad, F. (2014). An Introduction to Research Methods in Education and Psychology (5th Edition). Amman: Dar Al Masirah for publication and distribution.
Abdel-Fattah, F. (2011). Evaluating the quality of previous studies in undergraduate theses. A working paper presented at the Scientific Forum of the College of Graduate Studies Naif Arab University for Security Sciences. Riyadh, 1, 1 - 21.
Afana, E. I. S. (2011). Common mistakes in educational research designs among postgraduate students in Palestinian universities. A working paper presented to the Scientific Research Conference: Concepts - Ethics - Employment. Gaza: The Islamic University, 305-336.
Akindele, O. (2008). A critical analysis of the literature review section of graduate dissertations at the University of Botswana. http://www.espworld.info/Artic les_ 20/ DOC/G RAD UAT E_W RITING_site.pdf
Al-Askar, A. A. (2011). Scientific Research Methodology in Psychological and Educational Sciences. Cairo: Egyptian Office for Publications.
Alassaf, S. (2010). An introduction to research in behavioral sciences. Obaykan Bookshop.
Alduhayan, S., & Ezat, H. (2002). Data analysis with SPSS 16. Obikan.
Al-Khalili, K. Y. (2012). Fundamentals of educational scientific research. United Arab Emirates: Dar Al Qalam for Publishing and Distribution.
Al-Safra N, M. (2020). Common mistakes in doctoral dissertations, major general curricula, and teaching methods at King Khalid University, in the light of analyzing its content and the opinions of faculty members. King Khalid University Journal of Educational Sciences, 7 (1), 195-222.
Bacha, N. N. (2019). Writing the argumentative literary review in EFL/ESL contexts: A critical analysis perspective. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 7(1), 1- 12. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.Vol7.Iss1.1309.
Basthomi, Y. (2009). Examining Research Spaces. TEFLIN Journal, 20(2), 140–158. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v20i2/140-158
Benzie, H. J., & Harper, R. (2020). Developing student writing in higher education: digital third-party products in distributed learning environments. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(5), 633–647. https://doi.org/10.108 0/135625 17.20 19.1590327
Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034006003.
Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
Chinese, S. I. (2010). Basic rules in scientific research. Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah: Al-Risala Foundation.
Ching Hei, K., & David, M. K. (2015). Basic and Advanced Skills They Don’t Have: The Case of Postgraduate and Literature Review Writing. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2015.12.7
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2003). Research methods in education. (5th ed.). Routledge Falmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203224342
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Routledge Falmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
Cooper, H. M. (1988). Organizing knowledge synthesis: A taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowledge in Society, 1(1), 104–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03177550
Crowl, T. K. (1996). Fundamentals of educational research. Brown & Benchmark.
Defazio, J., Jones, J., Tennant, F., & Hook, S. A. (2015). Academic literacy: The importance and impact of writing across the curriculum-a case study. In Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (Vol. 10, Issue 2). www.iupui.edu/~josotl
El-Freihat, S. M. (2021). Challenges facing students in writing theses at the Jordanian universities. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(6), 3266–3277. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i6.6321
Fergie, G., Beeke, S., McKenna, C., & Crème, P. (2011). It’s a lonely walk: Supporting postgraduate researchers through writing. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 135–149. https://eric.ed.gov/?id= EJ946149
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2008). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2007). Data elicitation for second and foreign language research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203826102
Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2000). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (6th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. W. (2003). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (7th ed.). Mer-rill/Prentice Hall.
Hamzah, M. S. G., Kafipour, R., & Abdullah, S. K. (2009). Vocabulary learning strategies of Iranian undergraduate EFL students and its relation to their vocabulary size. European Journal of Social Sciences, 11(1), 39–50. https://www.academia.edu/13315871/Vocabulary_learning_ strategies_ of_Iranian_u nderg raduate_EFL_students_and.
Hassan, E. A. M. (2016). Common Mistakes of Researchers in Psychological and Educational Research. Working paper submitted to the conference: Education Technology and Global Challenges for Education: The Arab Association for Educational Technologies. Cairo: Arab Society for Educational Technologies, 67-85.
Huang, R. (2007). A Challenging but worthwhile experience: Asian international student perspectives of undertaking a dissertation in the UK. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 6(1), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.3794/johlste.61.130
Imafuku, R., Saiki, T., Kawakami, C., & Suzuki, Y. (2015). How do students’ perceptions of research and approaches to learning change in undergraduate research? International Journal of Medical Education, 6, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5523.2b9e
Jazan University Preparatory Year Students. Journal of Education and Practice, 9 (11).
Kachru, B. (1999). The alchemy of English. Pergamon.
Kafipour, R., Mahmoudi, E., & Khojasteh, L. (2018). The effect of task-based language teaching on analytic writing in EFL classrooms. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1496627. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1496627.
Kafipour, R., Mahmoudi, E., & Khojasteh, L. (2018). The effect of task-based language teaching on analytic writing in EFL classrooms. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1496627. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1496627
Kayed, A., & Adass, A. (2012). Scientific Research: Its Concept, Tools, and Methods (14th edition). Amman: Dar Al-Fikr Publishers and Distributors.
Khozaei Ravari, Z., & Tan, K. E. (2019). A qualitative investigation of strategies and experiences of non-native students writing master’s theses. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 11(2), 310-324. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-07-2018-0120
Kojak, K. H. (2007). Common mistakes in educational research. Cairo: World of Books.
Lopez, M. C. (2014). Survey of research methods: Literature review. Michigan State University. Online article.
Mallett, S. (2004). Understanding home: A critical review of the literature. The Sociological Review, 52(1), 62–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00442.x.
Mousavi, H. S., & Kashefian-Naeeini, S. (2011). An investigation into the role of EFL learners’ attitudes, motivation and proficiency in learning among Iranian students of National University in Malaysia. European Journal of Social Sciences, 23(4), 593–603. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v17i08/47224.
Musa, N. F., & Khamis, N. (2015). Research article writing: A review of a complete rhetorical organisation. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 23(August).
Notar, C., & Cole, V. (2010). Literature Review Organizer. International Journal of Education, 2 (2), 1- 17. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v2i2.319
Nouri, J., Larsson, K., & Saqr, M. (2019, September). Identifying factors for master thesis completion and non-completion through learning analytics and machine learning. In European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 28-39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29736-7_3
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
Oppenheim, A. (2001). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. Continuum.
Patterson, J., & Gilkison, A. (2020). Writing a journal article from your thesis or research project. New Zealand College of Midwives Journal, 2020(56), 13-16. https://doi.org/10.12784/nzcomjn l56.2020.2.13-16
Pertiwi, W. H. S. (2020). Teaching research in undergraduate English language teacher education degree programs in Indonesia: A case study [PhD these]. Charles Darwin. University. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2014.07.001%0
Pertiwi, W. H. S., & Weganofa, R. (2014). Students' understanding of qualitative research methods: A reflection on research articles. LiNGUA: Journal of Language and Literature, 10(1), 18-18.
Rahmiati. (2015). Analisis Kendala Internal Mahasiswa dalam Menulis Karya Ilmiah (Analysis of Students' Internal Constraints in Writing Scientific Papers). Al Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Ketatanegaraan, 4(2), 327 – 343. https://doi.org/10.24252/ad.v4i2.1486
Rakhmawati, A. (2013). English research article written by Indonesian academics: Coping with common practices and rhetorical diversity. In FLLT 2013 Conference Proceedings (pp. 265- 275). The Language Institute of Thammasat University
Randolph, J. (2009). A guide to writing the dissertation literature review. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(13), 1-14. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=14&n=13
Safnil, A. (2018). Kesulitan Penulis Indonesia Dalam Bidang Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora untuk Menembus Jurnal Internasional Bereputasi berbahasa Inggris. Bengkulu: Universitas Bengkulu.
Shahsavar, Z., & Kourepaz, H. (2020). Postgraduate students face difficulties in writing their literature review for their theses. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.178 4620
Shahsavar, Z., Tan, B. H., Yap, N. T., & Bahaman, A. S. (2013). Promoting tertiary-level students' critical thinking through the use of Socratic questioning on the blog. Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Human, 21(S), 57–70. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289950616 _Promoting_tertiary_level_students'_critical_thinking_through_the_ use_of_socratic_questioning_on_the_blog
Simpson, E., & Courtney, M. (2002). Critical thinking in nursing education: Literature review. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 8(2), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-172 x.2002.00340.x
Stapleton, P. (2002). Critical thinking in Japanese L2 writing, rethinking tired constructs. ELT Journal, 56 (3), 250–257. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.3.250.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, G. (2013). How to do your research project. SAGE Publication Limited.
Tsoulfas, G. (2021). The Importance of Research. In Journal of the American College of Surgeons (Vol. 232, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.02.003
Turner, E., & Bitchener, J. (2008). An approach to teaching the writing of literature reviews. Zeitschrift Schreiben, 1–10. Online. https://zeitschrift-schreiben.eu/globalassets/zeitschrift-schre iben.eu/2008/turner_approach_teaching.pdf (accessed 18 May 2025)
Wee, B. V., & Banister, D. (2016). How to Write a Literature Review Paper? Transport Reviews, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1065456
Zabihi, L., & Shubar, E. (2017). Common mistakes in scientific research. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Scientific Research Generation Center, (29), 11-23.
Zotzmann, K., & Sheldrake, R. (2021). Postgraduate students’ beliefs about and confidence for academic writing in the field of applied linguistics. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.10 0810