Investigating EFL Students’ ChatGPT Usage and Attitudes Through the Lens of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
Article Number: e2025507 | Available Online: October 2025 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.18.507
Maha Alghasab
Full text PDF |
10273 |
1635
Abstract
|
Background/purpose. Due to its significant potential, ChatGPT has recently revolutionized global education, particularly in the field of language learning. Against this backdrop, this study examines the perceptions of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students regarding the use of ChatGPT to enhance their English language skills. It examines whether gender and prior experience with technology influence EFL learners' perceptions of ChatGPT and their intentions to utilize it. Materials/methods. Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), this study examines several key attributes: perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude, behavioral intention, actual use, perceived enjoyment, facilitating conditions, and technological complexity. Employing a sequential explanatory mixed methods design, the data were collected using an adapted TAM questionnaire (n=108), followed by semi-structured interviews with selected students who exhibited the highest and lowest positive responses (20 students). Descriptive and inferential statistics were employed to analyze the quantitative data, while a thematic analysis was utilized for qualitative data analysis. Results. Findings revealed overall positive perceptions towards using ChatGPT. Statistical analysis indicated that gender did not significantly influence TAM attributes. However, prior experience with technology emerged as a statistically significant predictor, demonstrating a measurable impact on both intentions to use and the actual use of ChatGPT. |
Conclusion. These findings suggest that one of the most effective ways to overcome resistance to adopting ChatGPT is to increase users' familiarity and confidence in the technology.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence (AI), Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), gender, computer experience, Language Learning.
ReferencesAbdaljaleel, M., Barakat, M., Alsanafi, M., Salim, N. A., Abazid, H., Malaeb, D., Mohammed, A. H., Hassan, B. A. R., Wayyes, A. M., Farhan, S. S., Khatib, S. E., Rahal, M., Sahban, A., Abdelaziz, D. H., Mansour, N. O., AlZayer, R., Khalil, R., Fekih-Romdhane, F., & Hallit, R., ... (2024). A multinational study on the factors influencing university students’ attitudes and usage of ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 52549. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52549-8
Aksakallı, C., & Daşer, Z. (2025). Unlocking EFL learners’ insights into ChatGPT use for L2 writing: The impacts of usage frequency and gender variations. Current Psychology, 44(9), 7957–7977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07437-3
Alenezi, W. (2024). Potentiality and apprehensions of artificial intelligence in education: Perspectives of education staff. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(4), 942–956. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.4177
Alharathi, M. S. (2024). Beyond traditional language learning: EFL student views on ChatGPT in Saudi Arabia. Arab World [Journal]. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/7b34j
Alkandari, H. (2025). Students’ learning in the time of artificial intelligence (AI): Students’ perceptions of using AI tools to improve their language learning in Kuwait. Educational Process International Journal, 15(1), Article e2025154. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.15.154
Al-Khreshehm, M. (2024). The future of artificial intelligence in English language teaching: Pros and Cons of ChatGPT implementation through a systematic review. Teaching. Research Quarterly, 43, 54–80. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2024.43.04
Allen, T. J., & Mizumoto, A. (2024). ChatGPT over my friends: Japanese EFL learners’ preferences for editing and proofreading strategies. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882241262533
Almansour, N. (2024). Investigating factors influencing EFL learners’ behavioural intentions to adopt ChatGPT for language learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(6), 1910–1918. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1506.16
Alotaibi, H. M., Sonbul, S. S., & El-Dakhs, D. A. (2025). Factors Influencing the Acceptance and Use of ChatGPT among English as a Foreign Language Learners in Saudi Arabia. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 628. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04945-2
Alsalem, M. S. (2024). EFL students’ perception and attitude towards the use of ChatGPT to promote English speaking skills in the Saudi context. Arab World English Journal, 15(4), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol15no4.5
Baek, C., Tate, T., & Warschauer, M. (2024). ‘GhatGPT seems too good to be true’: College students’ use and perceptions of generative AI. Computers and education. Artificial Intelligence, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100294
Bao, Y., & Li, B. (2023). A preliminary study on graduate student instructors’ exploration, perception, and use of ChatGPT. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.332873
Barrot, J. S. (2023a). Using automated written corrective feedback in the writing classrooms: Effects on L2 writing accuracy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(4), 584–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1936071
Barrot, J. S. (2023b). Using ChatGPT for Second Language Writing: Pitfalls and Potentials. Assessing Writing, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745
Baytak, A. (2023). The acceptance and diffusion of generative artificial intelligence in education: A literature review. Current Perspectives in Educational Research, 6(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.46303/cuper.2023.2
Bodani, N., Lal, A., Maqsood, A., Altamash, S., Ahmed, N., & Heboyan, A. (2023). Knowledge, attitude, and practices of general population toward utilizing ChatGPT: A cross-sectional study. Sage Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231211079
Boudouaia, A., Mouas, S., & Kouider, B. (2024). A study on ChatGPT-4 as an innovative approach to enhancing English as a foreign language writing learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(6), 1289–1317. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241247465
Creely, E. (2024). Exploring the role of generative AI in enhancing language learning: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Changes in Education, 1(3), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE42022495
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Draxler, F., Buschek, D., Tavast, M., Hämäläinen, P., Schmidt, A., Kulshrestha, J., & Welsch, R. (2023). Gender, age, and technology education influence the adoption and appropriation of LLMs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06556. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.06556
Ekundayo, T., Khanm, Z., & Chaudhry, S. A. (2024). GhatGPT’s Integration in GCC Higher Education: A Bibliometric Analysis of Trends. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2024.133.4
Elshaer, I. A., Hasanein, A. M., & Sobaih, A. E. E. (2024). The moderating effects of gender and study discipline in the relationship between university students’ acceptance and use of ChatGPT. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 14(7), 1981–1995. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14070132
Faisal, E. (2024). Unlock the potential for Saudi Arabian higher education: A systematic review of the benefits of ChatGPT. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1325601
Frank, K. A., Zhao, Y., & Borman, K. M. (2004). Social capital and the diffusion of innovations within organizations: The case of computer technology in schools. Sociology of Education, 77(2), 148–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070407700203
Gligorea, I., Cioca, M., Oancea, R., Gorski, A.-T., Gorski, H., & Tudorache, P. (2023). Adaptive learning using artificial intelligence in e-learning: A literature review. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121216
Godwin-Jones, R. (2022). Partnering with AI: Intelligent writing assistance and instructed language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 26(2), 5–24. http://doi.org/10125/73474
Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
Grassini, S., Aasen, M. L., & Møgelvang, A. (2024). Understanding university students’ acceptance of ChatGPT: Insights from the UTAUT2 model. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 38(1), Article 2371168. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2024.2371168
Holmes, W., Porayska‐Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., Santos, O. C., Rodrigo, M. T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I. I., & Koedinger, K. R. (2022). Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1
Horn, K. (2024). ChatGPT in English language learning: Exploring Perceptions and Promoting autonomy in a University EFL context. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language TESL-EJ, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.28109a8
Hu, W.-C., & Škultéty, R. (2024). Unlocking the learning potential: ChatGPT as a virtual platform for cross-interaction in English language learning. Eng. Proc., 74, 59. https://doi.org/engproc2024074059
Huang, F., Teo, T., & Scherer, R. (2022). Investigating the antecedents of university students’ perceived ease of using the Internet for learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(6), 1060–1076. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1710540
Huang, H.-M., & Liaw, S.-S. (2018). An analysis of learners’ intentions toward virtual reality learning based on constructivist and technology acceptance approaches. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.2503
Huang, W., Hew, K. F., & Fryer, L. K. (2022). Chatbots for language learning -are they really useful? A Systematic Review of Chatbot-Supported Language Learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12610
Hwang, M., Lee, E., & Lee, H.-K. (2025). Exploring EFL learners’ acceptance of ChatGPT: Application of the extended technology acceptance model. English Teaching, 80(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.80.1.202503.45
Islahi, F., & Nasrin, N. (2019). Exploring teacher attitude towards information technology with a gender perspective. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.512527
Jorge-Vázquez, J., Náñez Alonso, S. L., Fierro Saltos, W. R., & Pacheco Mendoza, S. (2021). Assessment of digital competencies of university faculty and their conditioning factors: Case study in a technological adoption context. Education Sciences, 11(10), 637. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100637
Jushermi, J., Turnip, Y. D., & Musfar, T. F. (2024). Acceptance model for utilizing the e-marketplace Tokopedia with the Technology Acceptance Model among Pekanbaru city communities. West Science Business and Management, 2(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsbm.v2i01.562
Kemp, A., Palmer, E., & Strelan, P. (2019). A taxonomy of factors affecting attitudes towards educational technologies for use with technology acceptance models. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2394–2413. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12833
Khanchel, H. (2023). Factors affecting social network use by students in Tunisia. Human Systems Management, 42(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-220017
Kim, S.-W. (2023). Change in attitude toward artificial intelligence through experiential learning in artificial intelligence education. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 13(5), 1953–1959. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.13.5.19039
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Kostka, I., & Toncelli, R. (2023). Exploring applications of ChatGPT to English language teaching: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language–TESL-EJ, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27107int
Kotsis, K. T. (2024). Artificial Intelligence creates plagiarism or academic research? European Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(6), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejahss.2024.1(6).18
Li, B., Lowell, V., Wang, C., & Li, X. (2024a). A systematic review of the first year of publications on ChatGPT and language education: Examining research on ChatGPT’s use in language learning and teaching. Computers and education: Artificial Intelligence.7 article:100266 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100266
Liu, G., & Ma, C. (2024). Measuring EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT in informal digital learning of English based on the technology acceptance model. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2240316
Lo, C. K., Yu, P. L. H., Xu, S., Ng, D. T. K., & Jong, M. S. (2024). Exploring the application of ChatGPT in ESL/EFL education and related research issues: A systematic review of empirical studies. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00342-5
Ma, M. (2025). Exploring the acceptance of generative artificial intelligence for language learning among EFL postgraduate students: An extended tam approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12603
Panagiotarou, A., Stamatiou, Y. C., Pierrakeas, C., & Kameas, A. (2020). Gamification acceptance for learners with different e-skills. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(2), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.2.16
Polakova, P., & Ivenz, P. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT feedback on the development of EFL students’ writing skills. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2410101
Romero-Rodríguez, J.-M., Ramírez-Montoya, M.-S., Buenestado-Fernández, M., & Lara-Lara, F. (2023). Use of ChatGPT at university as a tool for complex thinking: Students’ perceived usefulness. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(2), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.7.1458
Sallam, M., Elsayed, W., Al-Shorbagy, M., Barakat, M., El Khatib, S., Ghach, W., Alwan, N., Hallit, S., & Malaeb, D. (2024). ChatGPT usage and attitudes are driven by perceptions of usefulness, ease of use, risks, and psycho-social impact: A study among university students in the UAE. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1414758. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1414758
Sindermann, C., Yang, H., Elhai, J. D., Yang, S., Quan, L., Li, M., & Montag, C. (2022). Acceptance and fear of artificial intelligence: Associations with personality in a German and a Chinese sample. Discover Psychology, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-022-00020-y
Slamet, J. (2024). Potential of ChatGPT as a digital language learning assistant: EFL teachers’ and students’ perceptions. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00143-2
Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: Assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1260843. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843
Su, Y., Lin, Y., & Lai, C. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms. Assessing Writing, 57, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100752
Teng, M. F. (2024). ‘ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies’: EFL learners’. perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing. Computers and Education, 7, Article 100270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100270
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Vo, T. K. A., & Nguyen, H. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence and ChatGPT in language learning: EFL students’ perceptions of technology acceptance. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(6). https://doi.org/10.53761/fr1rkj58
Warschauer, M., & Xu, Y. (2024). Generative AI for language learning: Entering a new era. Language Learning and Technology, 28(2), 1–4. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73569
Weidener, L., & Fischer, M. (2023). Teaching AI ethics in medical education: A scoping review of current literature and practices. Perspectives on Medical Education, 12(1), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.954
Marzuki, , Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, , & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.223646
Xiao, Y., & Zhi, Y. (2023). An exploratory study of EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT for language learning tasks: Experience and perceptions. Languages, 8(3), 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030212
Xiong, H. (2024). Research on confusing responses based on ChatGPT. Applied and Computational Engineering, 57(1), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/57/20241315
Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 13943–13967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4
Yilmaz, H., Maxutov, S., Baitekov, A., & Balta, N. (2023). Student attitudes towards ChatGPT: A technology acceptance model survey. International Educational Review, 1(1), 57–83. https://doi.org/10.58693/ier.114
Yildiz, C. (2024). ChatGPT integration in EFL education: A path to improved speaking self-efficacy. Novitas-ROYAL (research on Youth and language), 18(2), 167–182.
Zhang, B., Zhu, Y., Deng, J., Zheng, W., Liu, Y., Wang, C., & Zeng, R. (2023). ‘I am here to assist your tourism’: Predicting continuance intention to use AI-based chatbots for tourism. Does gender really matter? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(9), 1887–1903. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2124345
Zhu, M., & Wang, C. (2025). A systematic review of artificial intelligence in language education: Current status and future implications. Language Learning and Technology, 29(1), 1–29. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73606
Zhou, Y., Wu, X., & Qu, K. (2024). The role of ChatGPT in English language learning: A hedonic motivation perspective on student adoption in Chinese universities. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 43, 132–154. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2024.43.08