Adaptive Assessment in Digital Learning Environments: An Expectancy-Value Theory Approach to Enhancing Learner Motivation

Background/purpose. This study addresses the problem of demotivation generated by traditional assessment methods, which are often standardized, unengaging, and ill-suited to individual differences. In an increasingly digitized educational context, the primary objective is to assess the ability of an adaptive assessment system, developed on the Moodle platform, to stimulate learner motivation in accordance with the components of expectation-valence theory.

Materials/methods. A mixed-methodology approach was adopted, combining quantitative data (academic results) with qualitative data (motivational questionnaire). The sample consisted of 72 senior students from a Moroccan public high school, randomly divided into two groups: an experimental group that underwent an adaptive online assessment, and a control group that received a traditional uniform assessment. The scenario integrated into Moodle included differentiated levels, immediate feedback, and progressive access conditions.

Results. The results reveal a significant improvement in performance for the experimental group (average of 14.56/20 compared to 11.87/20). Qualitative data indicate a strengthening of perceptions of competence (expectancy), task usefulness (instrumentality), and assessment value (valence). The program was well received, with a satisfaction rate of 97.2%.

Conclusion. Adaptive assessment appears to be an effective pedagogical lever for strengthening student motivation. The study proposes a transferable model that aligns LMS functionalities with the psychological determinants of motivation, in favor of a more inclusive and regulatory assessment of learning.

Keywords: Adaptive assessment, digital learning environments, educational technology, expectancy-value theory, learner motivation, moodle

References

Al-Aamri, M. S. H., Soliman, M., & Ponniah, L. S. (2024). Influencers of academic staff performance in higher education: The r Al-Aamri, M. S. H., Soliman, M., & Ponniah, L. S. (2024). Influencers of academic staff performance in higher education: The role of motivation, transformational leadership and involvement in strategic planning. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(5), 1355–1372. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-08-2023-0339

Alves, G. R., Viegas, M. C., Marques, M. A., Costa-Lobo, M. C., Silva, A. A., Formanski, F., & Da Silva, J. B. (2013). Impact of different Moodle Course Designs on Students’ Performance. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 3(S2), 18. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v3iS2.2397

Bandhu, D., Mohan, M. M., Nittala, N. A. P., Jadhav, P., Bhadauria, A., & Saxena, K. K. (2024). Theories of motivation: A comprehensive analysis of human behavior drivers. Acta Psychologica, 244, 104177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104177

Banes, D., Hayes, A., Kurz, C., & Kashalnagar, R. (2021). Using Information Communications Technologies to Implement Universal Design for Learning.

Barata, G., Gama, S., Jorge, J., & Gonçalves, D. (2015). Gamification for smarter learning: Tales from the trenches. Smart Learning Environments, 2(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-015-0017-8

Chemsi, G., Sadiq, M., Radid, M., & Talbi, M. (2020). Study of the Self-Determined Motivation among Students in the Context of Online Pedagogical Activities. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(05), 17. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i05.11392

Cheung, S. K. S., Wang, F. L., Kwok, L. F., & Poulova, P. (2021). In search of the good practices of personalized learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(2), 179–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1894830

Chima Abimbola Eden, Onyebuchi Nneamaka Chisom, & Idowu Sulaimon Adeniyi. (2024). Harnessing technology integration in education: Strategies for enhancing learning outcomes and equity. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 11(2), 001–008. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2024.11.2.0071

Delaney, T. A., & Hata, M. (2020). Universal Design for Learning in Assessment: Supporting ELLs with Learning Disabilities. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 13(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2020.13.1.5

Gamage, S. H. P. W., Ayres, J. R., & Behrend, M. B. (2022). A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00323-x

Grund, A., Fries, S., Nückles, M., Renkl, A., & Roelle, J. (2024). When is Learning “Effortful”? Scrutinizing the Concept of Mental Effort in Cognitively Oriented Research from a Motivational Perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09852-7

Hehir, T. (2002). Eliminating Ableism in Education. Harvard Educational Review, 72(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.72.1.03866528702g2105

Kapsargina, S., & Olentsova, J. (2020). Experience of Using LMS Moodle in the Organization of Independent Work of Bachelors in Teaching a Foreign Language: International Scientific Conference “Far East Con” (ISCFEC 2020), Vladivostok, Russia. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200312.076

Kyewski, E., & Krämer, N. C. (2018). To gamify or not to gamify? An experimental field study of the influence of badges on motivation, activity, and performance in an online learning course. Computers & Education, 118, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.006

Lagou, M., Arsenos, P., Hyz, A., & Stavroulakis, D. (2024). Integrating The Factors of Employee Motivation Theories. International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research, 09(08), 2603–2615. https://doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2024.v09i08.003

Lankauskienė, R., Bandyopadhyay, P. K., & Roy, S. (2025). Evolution of Customer-Centric Innovations in Modern Ecosystems: Servitization Approach. Sustainability, 17(11), 4754. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114754

Levitats, Z., Ivcevic, Z., & Brackett, M. (2025). Emotionally Intelligent Behavior in Organizations: When Ability, Motivation, and Opportunity Meet. Emotion Review, 17540739251333990. https://doi.org/10.1177/17540739251333990

Li, M., Ma, S., & Shi, Y. (2023). Examining the effectiveness of gamification as a tool promoting teaching and learning in educational settings: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1253549. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1253549

Machkour, M., El Jihaoui, M., Lamalif, L., Faris, S., & Mansouri, K. (2025). Toward an adaptive learning assessment pathway. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1498233. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1498233

Manzano-León, A., Camacho-Lazarraga, P., Guerrero, M. A., Guerrero-Puerta, L., Aguilar-Parra, J. M., Trigueros, R., & Alias, A. (2021). Between Level Up and Game Over: A Systematic Literature Review of Gamification in Education. Sustainability, 13(4), 2247. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042247

Memarian, B., & Doleck, T. (2024). A review of assessment for learning with artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(1), 100040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100040

Mishra, S., Khashabi, D., Baral, C., & Hajishirzi, H. (2022). Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructions (No. arXiv:2104.08773). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.08773

Multimedia Engineering Department, Hannam University, Daejeon, South Korea, Munna, Md. S. H., Hossain, Md. R., Multimedia Engineering Department, Hannam University, Daejeon, South Korea, Saylo, K. R., & Innovative Technology Convergence Society Inc., Sibalom, Antique, Philippines. (2024). Digital Education Revolution: Evaluating LMS-based Learning and Traditional Approaches. Journal of Innovative Technology Convergence, 6(2), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.69478/JITC2024v6n002a03

Nakata, Y., Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q., & Tsuda, A. (2025). Student perceptions of feedback and self-regulated language learning: A mixed-methods investigation. System, 131, 103654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103654

Permzadian, V., & Shen, T. (2024). Assessing the predictive validity of expectancy theory for academic performance. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 437. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01935-y

Reis-Andersson, J. (2024). Leading the digitalization in K–12 education at the municipality level. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2368997. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2368997

Ryoo, J., & Winkelmann, K. (Eds.). (2021). Innovative Learning Environments in STEM Higher Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Looking Forward. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58948-6

Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Michel-Villarreal, R., & Montesinos, L. (2024). Using Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools to Explain and Enhance Experiential Learning for Authentic Assessment. Education Sciences, 14(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010083

Setiasih, O., Setiawardani, W., Hidayat, A. N., Djoehaeni, H., Robayanti, D., Ibrohim, M. M., & Sholeh, M. (2024). DEVELOPMENT OF A DESIGN LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (LMS) TO IMPROVE STUDENT SKILLS: CASE STUDY IN A SCIENCE LEARNING MEDIA DEVELOPMENT COURSE.

Simon, P. D., Jiang, J., Fryer, L. K., King, R. B., & Frondozo, C. E. (2024). An Assessment of Learning Management System Use in Higher Education: Perspectives from a Comprehensive Sample of Teachers and Students. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09734-5

Song, R., & Zheng, Y. (2024). Predicting Continuance Intention to Use Learning Management Systems among Undergraduates: The Moderating Effect of Intrinsic Motivation. Sage Open, 14(3), 21582440241271319. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241271319

Stranford, S. A. (2024). Fostering student agency and motivation: Co-creation of a rubric for self-evaluation in an ungraded course. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1213444. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1213444

Supiani, S., Kurniady, D. A., Yuniarsih, T., Syah, S., & Nurfitriah, N. (n.d.). LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (LMS) AS SUPPORTING TECHNOLOGY FOR SCHOOL MANAGEMENT. 6.

Talysheva, I., Pegova, K., & Khaliullina, L. (2021). The Use of Electronic Educational Resources of The University as A Means of Increasing The Educational Motivation of Students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(01), 289. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i01.16799

Van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Frèrejean, J., Dolmans, D., Van Merriënboer, J., & Visscher, A. J. (2019). Capturing the complexity of differentiated instruction. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2018.1539013

Vu, T., Magis-Weinberg, L., Jansen, B. R. J., Van Atteveldt, N., Janssen, T. W. P., Lee, N. C., Van Der Maas, H. L. J., Raijmakers, M. E. J., Sachisthal, M. S. M., & Meeter, M. (2022). Motivation-Achievement Cycles in Learning: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 39–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09616-7

Wang, Y., Wu, J., Chen, F., & Li, J. (2024). Analyzing Teaching Effects of Blended Learning With LMS: An Empirical Investigation. IEEE Access, 12, 42343–42356. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3352169

Wigfield, A., Muenks, K., & Eccles, J. S. (2021). Achievement Motivation: What We Know and Where We Are Going. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 3(1), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-050720-103500

Wormeli, R. (2023). Fair Isn’t Always Equal: Assessment & Grading in the Differentiated Classroom (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032681122

Yüksel, G., & Alcı, B. (2012). Self-Efficacy and Critical Thinking Dispositions as Predictors of Success in School Practicum. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences.

Yusron Abda’u Ansya, Ayu Alfianita, Hanna Putri Syahkira, & Syahrial. (2024). OPTIMIZING Mathematics Learning in Fifth Grades: The Critical Role of Evaluation in Improving Student Achievement and Character. Progres Pendidikan, 5(3), 302–311. https://doi.org/10.29303/prospek.v5i3.1120

Announcement

EDUPIJ Citation Metrics

EDUPIJ News!