Factors Determining Governance Effectiveness in Vietnamese Universities: A Mixed-Method Investigation
Article Number: e2025605 | Available Online: December 2025 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.19.605
Tan Dat Truong
Full text PDF |
762 |
277
Abstract
|
Background/Purpose. In the context of higher education being strongly influenced by globalization, the knowledge economy, and the Fourth Industrial Revolution, university governance effectiveness has become a central issue in many countries, including Vietnam. This study aims to identify and measure the factors influencing governance effectiveness in Vietnamese universities, addressing the gap in large-scale empirical research within the domestic context. Materials/Methods. A mixed-methods approach employing a convergent parallel design was adopted, combining a survey of 455 administrators, faculty members, and staff from various types of higher education institutions with 15 in-depth interviews. Quantitative analyses (Cronbach’s Alpha coefficients ranging from 0.89 to 0.92, EFA, ANOVA, and multiple linear regression) and qualitative analyses (thematic analysis) were conducted independently and later integrated during the discussion phase. Results. The findings indicate that leadership competence (β = 0.21) and the legal-policy framework (β = 0.18) are the strongest predictors of governance effectiveness, followed by international collaboration (β = 0.14), infrastructure (β = 0.12), and organizational culture (β = 0.10). Financial governance did not show a statistically significant direct effect in the regression model (β = 0.08, Sig. = 0.070). |
Conclusion. This research provides the first large-scale empirical evidence for a multifactor governance model in the Vietnamese context. The findings offer important implications for macro-level policy reform and institutional strategic development. The main limitations of the study include its cross-sectional design and the use of purposive convenience sampling.
Keywords: University governance, university autonomy, educational policy, organizational culture, international collaboration, facilities, financial governance.
ReferencesAgasisti, T., & Shibanova, E. (2022). Actual autonomy, efficiency, and performance of universities: Insights from the Russian case. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(2), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1903496
Andersson, C., & Sund, K. (2022). Technical efficiency and productivity of higher education institutions in the Nordic countries. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(2), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1868508
Angiola, N., Bianchi, P., & Damato, L. (2018). Performance management in public universities: Overcoming bureaucracy. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(4), 736-753. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2017-0018
Ardito, L., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., & Albino, V. (2015). From technological inventions to new products: A systematic review and research agenda of the main enabling factors. European Management Review, 12(3), 113-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12047
Argento, D., Dobija, D., & Grossi, G. (2020). The disillusionment of calculative practices in academia. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 17(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-12-2019-0130
Argento, D., & van Helden, J. (2023). Are public sector accounting researchers going through an identity shift due to the increasing importance of journal rankings? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 96, 1025-1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2022.102537
Arnaboldi, M., & Azzone, G. (2010). Constructing performance measurement in the public sector. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(4), 266-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2010.01.016
Becker, A., & Lukka, K. (2023). Instrumentalism and the publish-or-perish regime. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 94, 102436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2022.102436
Bisogno, M., Dumay, J., Manes Rossi, F., & Tartaglia Polcini, P. (2018). Identifying future directions for IC research in education: A literature review. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(1), 10-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-10-2017-0133
Boitier, M., & Rivière, A. (2013). Are French universities under control? Public Money & Management, 33(2), 105-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2013.763417
Brooks, C., Schopohl, L., & Walker, J. T. (2023). Comparing perceptions of the impact of journal rankings between fields. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 90, 102381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102381
Broucker, B., Ursin, J., Dal Molin, M., & De Wit, K. (2021). To achieve the same as the others? Policy preconditions for successful higher education governance. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(2), 84-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1942045
Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877
Bui, H. T. (2024). Several university governance models worldwide and lessons for Vietnamese universities. Journal of Economics, Law and Banki. https://doi.org/10.59276/JELB.2024.08.2796
Cadez, S., Dimovski, V., & Zaman Groff, M. (2017). Research, teaching and performance evaluation in academia: The salience of quality. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1455-1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1104659
Camilleri, M. A. (2021). Using the balanced scorecard as a performance management tool in higher education. Management in Education, 35(1), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020620921412
Caracelli, V. J., & Greene, J. C. (1993). Data analysis strategies for mixed-methods evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 195-207. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737015002195
Chatterjee, B., Cordery, C. J., De Loo, I., & Letiche, H. (2020). The spectacle of research assessment systems: Insights from New Zealand and the United Kingdom. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(6), 1219-1246. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2019-3865
Christopher, J., & Leung, P. (2015). Tensions arising from imposing NPM in Australian public universities: A management perspective. Financial Accountability & Management, 31(2), 171-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12053
Cricelli, L., Greco, M., Grimaldi, M., & Llanes Dueñas, L. P. (2018). Intellectual capital and university performance in emerging countries: Evidence from Colombian public universities. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(1), 71-95. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-02-2017-0037
Dao, T. T. (2020). Research on autonomous university models and solutions to enhance autonomy and accountability of higher education institutions in Vietnam, 2018-2025, vision 2030 [Doctoral dissertation, VNU University of Education, Vietnam National University, Hanoi].
Dinh, X. K. (2019). Governance of public universities in the current context [Doctoral dissertation, Vinh University].
Dinh, X. K., & Pham, M. H. (2017). Quality assurance in higher education governance in the context of international integration. Theoretical and Educational Science Research, (137), 1-5.
Do, T. V. (2014). System theory and application in information systems. Vietnam Library Journal, 5(18), 35-40.
Dobbins, M., & Jungblut, J. (2018). Higher education governance. In Oxford bibliographies in education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756810-0203
Dougherty, K. J., & Natow, R. S. (2020). Performance-based funding for higher education: How well does neoliberal theory capture neoliberal practice? Higher Education, 80(3), 457-478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00491-4
Dumay, J., de Villiers, C., Guthrie, J., & Hsiao, P. C. (2018). Thirty years of Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal: A critical study of the journal's most cited articles. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(5), 1510-1541. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2017-2915
Englund, H., & Gerdin, J. (2020). Contesting conformity: How and why academics may oppose the conforming influences of intra-organizational performance evaluations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(5), 913-938. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2019-3932
Esposito, V., de Nito, E., Iacono, M. P., & Silvestri, L. (2013). Dealing with knowledge in the Italian public universities: The role of performance management systems. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(3), 431-450. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-03-2013-0035
Facchini, C., & Fia, M. (2021). Public sector reform in Italian higher education: The governance transformation of the universities-A comparison among perceptions of rectors and department chairs. Higher Education Policy, 34(3), 560-581. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-019-00152-2
Fadda, N., Marinò, L., Pischedda, G., & Ezza, A. (2021). The effect of performance-oriented funding in higher education: Evidence from the staff recruitment budget in Italian higher education. Higher Education, 83(5), 1003-1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00725-4
Foy, T., Dwyer, R. J., Nafarrete, R., Hammoud, M. S. S., & Rockett, P. (2019). Managing job performance, social support and work-life conflict to reduce workplace stress. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(6), 1018-1041. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2017-0061
Gao, Y. (2018). A set of indicators for measuring and comparing university internationalisation performance across national boundaries. Higher Education, 76(2), 317-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0210-5
Gebreiter, F. (2022). A profession in peril? University corporatisation, performance measurement and the sustainability of accounting academia. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 87, 102292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102292
Gendron, Y. (2015). Accounting academia and the threat of the paying-off mentality. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 26, 168-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2013.06.004
Gerdin, J., & Englund, H. (2022). Vertical, horizontal, and self-control in academia: Survey evidence on their diverging effects on perceived researcher autonomy and identity. The British Accounting Review, 54(5), 101055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2021.101055
Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. (2005). Resolution 14/2005/NQ-CP dated November 2, 2005 on the fundamental and comprehensive education innovation in Viet Nam in the period 2006-2020.
Grossi, G., Steccolini, I., Adhikari, P., Brown, J., Christensen, M., Cordery, C., Ferry, L., Lassou, P., McDonald III, B., Raudla, R., Sicilia, M., & Vinnari, E. (2023). The future of public sector accounting research: A polyphonic debate. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 20(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-09-2022-0135
Guthrie, A. M. J., Linnenluecke, M. K., Martin-Sardesai, A., Shen, Y., & Smith, T. (2022). On the resilience of Australian public universities: Why our institutions may fail unless vice-chancellors rethink broken commercial business models. Accounting & Finance, 62(2), 2203-2235. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12858
Guthrie, J., Parker, L. D., Dumay, J., & Milne, M. J. (2019). What counts for quality in interdisciplinary accounting research in the next decade: A critical review and reflection. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(1), 2-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2019-036
Habersam, M., Piber, M., & Skoog, M. (2021). Calculative regimes in the making: Implementation and consequences in the context of Austrian public universities. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 18(2), 169-194. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-01-2019-0021
Han, S., & Xu, X. (2019). How far has the state ‘stepped back’? An exploratory study of the changing governance of higher education in China (1978-2018). Higher Education, 78(5), 931-946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00378-4
Heinicke, X., & Guenther, T. W. (2020). The role of management controls in the higher education sector: An investigation of different perceptions. European Accounting Review, 29(3), 581-630. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2019.1619603
Hutaibat, K., Alhatabat, Z., von Alberti-Alhtaybat, L., & Al-Htaybat, K. (2021). Performance habitus: Performance management and measurement in UK higher education. Measuring Business Excellence, 25(2), 171-188. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-08-2019-0084
Jalali Aliabadi, F., Gal, G., & Mashyekhi, B. (2021). Public budgetary roles in Iran: Perceptions and consequences. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 18(1), 148-168. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-11-2018-0084
Kallio, K.-M., Kallio, T. J., Grossi, G., & Engblom, J. (2021). Institutional logic and scholars’ reactions to performance measurement in universities. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(9), 135-161. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2018-3400
Kantabutra, S. (2010). Vision effects: A critical gap in educational leadership research. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(5), 376-390. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541011055956
Kenny, J. (2018). Re-empowering academics in a corporate culture: An exploration of workload and performativity in a university. Higher Education, 27(8), 1308-1338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0143-z
Kezar, A., & Eckel, P. D. (2004). Meeting today’s governance challenges: A synthesis of the literature and examination of a future agenda for scholarship. Journal of Higher Education, 75(4), 371-399. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2004.11772266
King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400821211
Kim, D. H., & Bak, H. (2020). Reconciliation between monetary incentives and motivation crowding-out: The influence of perceptions of incentives on research performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(6), 1292-1317. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1771387
Kivipõld, K., Türk, K., & Kivipõld, L. (2021). Performance appraisal, justice and organizational effectiveness: A comparison between two universities. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70(1), 87-108. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-05-2019-0229
Kumar, A., & Thakur, R. R. (2019). Objectivity in performance ranking of higher education institutions using dynamic data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(4), 774-796. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2018-0089
Kure, N., Nørreklit, H., & Røge, K. M. (2021). Objective and results-based management of universities: Constructing reality or illusions? Financial Accountability & Management, 37(2), 204-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12251
Le, C. L. (2021). Proposal of a university governance model towards the mechanism of university autonomy. Vietnam Journal of Educational Sciences, 39(3), 1-6.
Le, C. L., & Do, D. T. (2019). Some university governance solutions approaching the trend of autonomy. Journal of Educational Management Science, 4(24), 43-50.
Le, T. N. (2025). Effective university governance in the AI era with AI competency frameworks for teachers and students and open-source AI. In Proceedings of the National Scientific Conference: University governance associated with scientific research in the new context (pp. 557-567). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15377318
Manes-Rossi, F., Spanò, R., Martin-Sardesai, A., & Guthrie, J. (2022). Performance management change: Discourses at play in an Italian university. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 34(4), 534-556. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-11-2021-0156
Martinez, A., & Lopez, M. (2021). Public-private partnerships in higher education: A global perspective. Oxford University Press.
Martin-Sardesai, A., & Guthrie, J. (2021). Outcomes-based metrics and research measurement in the Australian higher education sector: A fast-changing landscape. Trong Z. Hoque (Ed.), Outcomes-based approaches in government research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003004080-3-5
Martin-Sardesai, A., Guthrie, J., & Tucker, B. P. (2020). What you see depends on where you look: Performance measurement of Australian accounting academics. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(6), 1193-1218. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2019-4133
Martin-Sardesai, A., Irvine, H., Tooley, S., & Guthrie, J. (2017a). Government research evaluations and academic freedom: A UK and Australian comparison. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(2), 372-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1208156
Martin-Sardesai, A., Irvine, H., Tooley, S., & Guthrie, J. (2017b). Organizational change in an Australian university: Responses to a research assessment exercise. The British Accounting Review, 49(4), 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.05.002
Massaro, M., Dumay, J., & Guthrie, J. (2016). On the shoulders of giants: Undertaking a structured literature review in accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(5), 767-801. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2015-1939
Mattei, G., Grossi, G., & Guthrie, A. M. J. (2021). Exploring past, present and future trends in public sector auditing research: A literature review. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(7), 94-134. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-09-2020-1008
Mauro, S. G., Cinquini, L., & Grossi, G. (2017). Insights into performance-based budgeting in the public sector: A literature review and a research agenda. Public Management Review, 19(7), 911-931. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1243810
Mauro, S. G., Cinquini, L., Malmmose, M., & Nørreklit, H. (2024). University research by the numbers: Epistemic methods of using digitised performance measures and their implications for research practices. Financial Accountability & Management, 40(1), 58-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12367
Mense, E., Lemoine, P., Garretson, C., & Richardson, M. (2018). The development of global higher education in a world of transformation. Journal of Education and Development, 2(3), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.20849/jed.v2i3.529
Narayan, A. K. (2020). The development and use of performance measures in New Zealand tertiary education institutions. Accounting History, 25(2), 193-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1032373219842383
Nguyen, D. C. (2024). Innovation in university governance in Vietnam in the current period: Current situation and some recommendations. VJE Journal of Education, 24(5), 35-40.
Nguyen, D. C., & Vu, T. D. (2017). University governance following a quality assurance approach. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 33(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1159/vnuer.4097
Nguyen, D. P., & Nguyen, H. H. N. (2013). University governance and Vietnamese universities: economic models. Journal of Development and Integration, 18, 1-6.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Combs, J. P. (2010). Emergent data analysis techniques in mixed methods research: A synthesis. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 397-430). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193.n17
Parker, L., Martin-Sardesai, A., & Guthrie, J. (2023). The commercialised Australian public university: An accountingized transition. Financial Accountability & Management, 39(1), 125-150. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12310
Parvin, A. (2019). Leadership and management in quality assurance: Insights from the context of Khulna University, Bangladesh. Higher Education, 77(4), 739-756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0299-1
Pham, M. H., & Dinh, X. K. (2023). Components of governance in Vietnamese public universities in the current context. Vietnam Journal of Educational Sciences, 19(5), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.15625/2615-8957/123105012
Phạm, T. L. (2009, March). Building an effective university governance system - American experience. [Paper presentation]. 53rd International and Comparative Education Conference, Carolina, USA.
Pham, T. T. H., Nguyen, T. H. G., Vu, T. M. A., & Hoang, N. Q. (2019). Higher education governance - International experience and lessons for Vietnam. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 35(3), 32-45. https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1159/vnuer.4282
Plano Clark, V. L., & Ivankova, N. V. (2016). Mixed methods research: A guide to the field. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483398341
Pietilä, M., & Pinheiro, R. (2021). Reaching for different ends through tenure track-Institutional logics in university career systems. Higher Education, 81(6), 1197-1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00606-2
Pilonato, S., & Monfardini, P. (2020). Performance measurement systems in higher education: How levers of control reveal the ambiguities of developments. The British Accounting Review, 52(3), 100908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2020.100908
Ramassa, P., Avallone, F., & Quagli, A. (2023). Can “publishing game” pressures affect the choice of research topics? A survey of European accounting researchers. Journal of Management & Governance. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-023-09667-8
Rana, T., Ahmed, Z. U., Narayan, A., & Zheng, M. (2022). An institutional theory perspective on public sector reform and service performance reporting by New Zealand universities. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 18(3), 461-484. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-08-2020-0112
Rigby, J., Kobussen, G., Kalagnanam, S., & Cannon, R. (2021). Implementing responsibility centre management in a higher educational institution. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70(8), 2374-2392. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-05-2020-0218
Salazar-Rebaza, C., Zegarra-Alva, M., & Cordova-Buiza, F. (2022). Management and leadership in university education: Approaches and perspectives. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(3), 130-141. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(3).2022.11
Salmi, J., & Ly, T. P. (2019). Academic governance and leadership in Vietnam: Trends and challenges. Journal of International and Comparative Education, 8(2), 103-118.
Secundo, G., Lombardi, R., Dumay, J., & Guthrie, A. M. J. (2023). Reflecting on intellectual capital measurement and management in European universities. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(6), 1827-1845. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-03-2022-1632
Shattock, M. (2013). University governance, leadership and management in a decade of diversification and uncertainty. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(3), 217-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12017
Steccolini, I., Saliterer, I., & Guthrie, J. (2020). The role(s) of accounting and performance measurement systems in contemporary public administration. Public Administration, 98(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12642
Sukoco, B. M., Lestari, Y. D., Susanto, E., Nasution, R. A., & Usman, I. (2021). Middle manager capabilities and organisational performance: The mediating effect of organisational capacity for change. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(4), 1365-1384. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-07-2019-0364
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193
Teixeira, P., Biscaia, R., & Rocha, V. (2021). Competition for funding or funding for competition? Analysing the dissemination of performance-based funding in European higher education and its institutional effects. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(2), 94-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.2003812
The Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam. (2013). Resolution No. 29-NQ/TW dated November 4, 2013 on fundamental and comprehensive innovation in education, in response to industrialization and modernization in a socialist-oriented market economy during international integration.
The Politburo of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam. (2019). Resolution No. 52-NQ/TW dated September 27, 2019 on several guidelines and policies for active participation in the Industrial Revolution 4.0.
The Prime Minister of Vietnam. (2017). Directive No. 16/CT-TTg dated May 4, 2017 on promoting access to the Industrial Revolution 4.0.
Tran, M. D., Le, N. H., Phung, V. B. N., & Mai, T. A. (2021). Internationalization of higher education in several countries: Lessons for Vietnam. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 32(3), 42-65. https://jabes.ueh.edu.vn/Content/ArticleFiles/5c727e6a-4a82-4013-8381-10f357248054/JABES-2021-2-V28.pdf
Tran, N. C. (2018, August). Autonomy and social responsibility related to governance and finance for university education institutions in the context of current educational innovation, according to Resolution 29-NQ/TW. [Paper presentation]. Education Conference 2018: University education - standardization and international integration, Culture, Education, Youth, Adolescence and Children Committee of the National Assembly, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Truong, T. D., Le, Q. M., & Dang, T. T. L. (2024). Research on university governance and autonomy in Vietnam. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Science and Foreign Language Teaching (ICEF 2024) (pp. 498-506). Bach Khoa Publishing House. https://doi.org/10.51316/icef.hust.2024.52
Vakkuri, J., & Johanson, J.-E. (2020). Failed promises-Performance measurement ambiguities in hybrid universities. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 17(1), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-06-2019-0072
Wilkins, A. (2015). Professionalizing school governance: the disciplinary effects of school autonomy and inspection on the changing role of school governors. Journal of Education Policy, 30(2), 182-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2014.941414