Bridging the Gap: A Technology-Assisted Communicative Approach to Developing English and Workplace Competencies in Aeronautical Engineering Students
Article Number: 190 | Available Online: May 2025 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.16.190
Li-Wen Huang , Hsing Yu Hou
Full text PDF |
2890 |
1867
Abstract
|
Background. English proficiency is extremely important for future careers, particularly in aviation education and training. However, the current regulated school framework includes an insufficient two-hour per week. This study investigates the effectiveness of an extracurricular program, “Fun Language Club,” in improving English proficiency and workplace competencies among aeronautical engineering students at the University of Technology in Taiwan. Methods. Grounded in the Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) approach and English for Specific Purposes (ESP), the program incorporated interactive activities such as role-playing, discussions, and problem-solving, supported by international teaching assistants (ITAs) and digital tools. Based on IELTS scores, 70 second-year students were divided into advanced and primary classes. A mixed-methods approach was employed, including independent sample t-tests, correlation analysis, and NVivo coding. Results. The quantitative findings indicated an increase in English proficiency in both classes, with the primary class showing significant improvements, thereby reducing the performance gap. Moreover, the results of the University Competence Assessment Network (UCAN) assessment revealed statistically significant enhancements in various competencies, including communication, teamwork, and problem-solving. Correlation analysis indicated strong positive relationships among essential workplace skills. Qualitative feedback of ITAs highlighted growth in student motivation, communication, and cultural awareness through engaging classroom activities and the integration of technology. |
Conclusion. The combination of CLT, ESP, ITA support, and technology-assisted learning proved to be effective, significantly improving in language performance and workplace competencies, particularly for lower-performing students. This integrated approach positively impacted English proficiency and essential workplace competencies, making a strong case for its wider adoption in globalized and technology-driven academic and professional settings.
Keywords: English for specific purposes, communicative language teaching, workplace common competencies, innovative learning, technology integration
ReferencesAvsheniuk, N., Lutsenko, O., Seminikhyna, N., & Svyrydiuk, T. (2023). Fostering Intercultural communicative competence and student autonomy through project-based learning. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on Communication and Language in Virtual Spaces, 130-143.DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/comm1.10
Banciu, V., & Jireghie, A. (2012). Communicative language teaching. The Public Administration and Social Policies Review, 1(8), 94–98.
Belcher, D. (2009). What ESP is and can be: An introduction. In D. Belcher (Ed.), English for a specific purpose in theory and practice (pp.1–20). University of Michigan Press.
Benati, A. G. (2009). Japanese language teaching: A communicative approach. Continuum International Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050903429329
Brown, H. D. (2014). Principles of language learning and teaching: A course in second language acquisition (6th ed.) Pearson Education.
Burns, A. (1998). Teaching speaking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 102–123. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500003500
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
Carver, D. (1983). Some propositions about ESP. The ESP Journal, 2(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-2380(93)90003-P
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2218520
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539
Desai, A. A. (2015). Characteristics and principles of communicative language teaching. International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(7), 48–50.
Gondová, D. (2012). Taking first steps in teaching English: Teaching systems. EDIS–vydavateľstvo Žilinskej univerzity v Žiline.
Ho, Y. Y. C. (2020). Communicative language teaching and English as a foreign language undergraduates’ communicative competence in Tourism English. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education. 27,100271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100271
Holmes, J. (2005). When small talk is a big deal: Sociolinguistic challenges in the workplace. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis (pp. 344–372). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667299.012
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733031
Hyland, K. (2002). Specificity revisited: How far should we go now? English for Specific Purposes, 21(4), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00028-X
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315888835
Hymes, D. H. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Penguin Modern Linguistics Readings.
Iglesias Xamani, M. (2013). Practical implications of a constructivist approach to EFL teaching in a higher education context. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.10.2.3
Kenny, N.,Isik-Tas, E. E., Jian, H. (Eds). (2020). English for specific purposes of instruction and research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32914-3_1
Lin, I.-C., Chang, S.-H., Liu, P.-C., Kuo, P.-J., & Chung, K. C. (2024). Exploring the effectiveness and moderators of game learning on creativity enhancement: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 27(3), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202407_27(3).RP05
Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/413984
Littlewood, W. (2007). Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40(3), 243–429. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004363
Mackay, R., & Mountford, A. (Eds.). (1978). English for specific purposes: A case study approach. Longman.
Mahbub, M. A. (2020). Learning English mediated by Kahoot: Insights from the Indonesian EFL instructors. Journal on English as a Foreign Language. 10(2).246-267. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v10i2.1917
Metruk, R. (2018). Researching speaking: Teaching and assessment. Palacký University Olomouc.
Myles, J. (2009). Oral competency of ESL technical students in workplace internships. TESL-EJ, 13(1).
Nunan, D. (2021). Learner-centered English language education. The selected works of David Nunan. Routledge. https://doi-org.cyut.idm.oclc.org/10.4324/9780203096888
Omar, A., Taib, N. F., & Basri, I. S. (2012). Project-based learning: English carnival in Universiti Kuala Lumpur-Malaysia France Institute. The English Teacher, 41(1), 27–41.
Radosavlevikj, N. (2020). Teachers’ and students’ perceptions and challenges in communicative language teaching. The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes. 8(3), 307-317. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2003307R
Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305
Robinson, P. C. (1991). ESP today: A practitioner's guide. Prentice Hall.
Sabandar, G. N. C., Supit, N. R., Suryana, E. (2018).Kahoot!: Bring the fun into the classroom! IJIE (Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education) 2(2), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijie.v2i2.26244.
Salam, Y, M., & Luksfinanto, Y. (2024). A Comprehensive Review of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT)inModern Classrooms.Lingeduca: Journal of Language and Education Studies, 3(1), 58-70.https://doi.org/10.70177/lingeduca.v3i1.1338
Salmani Nodoushan, M. A. (2020). English for specific purposes: Traditions, trends, directions. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(1), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i1.16342
Siwalette, R., & Suyoto. (2021). Implementation of Kahoot as a creative learning media. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1933(1), 012023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1933/1/012023
Stefanova, A. (2022). Student needs analysis as part of higher education management: A focus on English for specific purposes. In A. Zahariev, S. Prodanov, & H. Ribeiro (Eds.), Economic and social development: Book of proceedings (pp. 337–344). Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency.
Tahir, M. (2009). English for specific purposes (ESP) and syllabus design. Journal of the College of Language (JCL). University of Baghdad. https://jcolang.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/JCL/article/view/411
Voller, P. (1997). Does the teacher have a role in autonomous language learning? In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 98–113). Longman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315842172-9
Wang, J. (2013). Is the communicative language teaching approach more effective than the grammar-translation method at teaching the ba-construction in Mandarin Chinese to American undergraduate students? (Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas).
Wood, D. (2009). Preparing ESP learners for workplace placement. ELT Journal, 63(4), 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp005