Volume 17 (2025) Download Cover Page

Probabilistic Thinking Process in Probability Problem-Solving Prospective Mathematics Teacher with Field-Independent based on Polya's Three Stages

Article Number: e2025333  |  Available Online: July 2025  |  DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.17.333

Supratman , I Ketut Budayasa , Endah Budi Rahaju

Abstract

Background/purpose. This study investigates the probabilistic thinking process in solving probability problems by prospective mathematics teachers with a field-independent cognitive style. The objective is to explore how individuals with this cognitive style approach problem-solving based on the three stages of Polya’s framework: understanding the problem, devising a plan, and carrying out the plan.

Materials/Methods. A descriptive qualitative approach with a case study design was employed. The participant was a female student enrolled in the Mathematics Education Program at the Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka, identified as having a field-independent cognitive style through the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT). The research instruments included a probability problem-solving task constructed based on indicators of probabilistic thinking and Polya’s stages, along with semi-structured interview guidelines. Data were collected through task-based problem-solving and interviews, and were analyzed using data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing.

Results. The participant demonstrated a systematic probabilistic thinking process across all three stages. During the problem-understanding phase, she successfully identified known and unknown information and accurately interpreted mathematical symbols. In the planning phase, she applied deductive reasoning to develop appropriate strategies. In the execution phase, she implemented the procedures precisely and arrived at logical conclusions.

Conclusion. The findings suggest that solving binomial distribution problems requires more than procedural knowledge; it also involves conceptual understanding, logical reasoning, and the capacity to manage uncertainty. Prospective mathematics teachers with a field-independent cognitive style exhibit strong potential in integrating structured probabilistic thinking with Polya’s problem-solving stages.

Keywords: Probabilistic thinking process, probability problem-solving, prospective mathematics teacher, field-independent, Polya’s three stages

References

Abbasi et, A. (2025). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. In Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning (Vol. 12, Issue 1). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8

AlAli, R., Wardat, Y., & Al-Qahtani, M. (2023). SWOM strategy and influence of its using on developing mathematical thinking skills and on metacognitive thinking among gifted tenth-grade students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12994

Ali, P. A., McGarry, J., & Maqsood, A. (2022). Spousal Role Expectations and Marital Conflict: Perspectives of Men and Women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(9–10), NP7082–NP7108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520966667

Ashkenazi, S., Danan, Y., & Okon-Singer, H. (2024). Mathematical anxiety is associated with reduced visuospatial working memory: the impact of emotional and spatial distracting information. Current Psychology, 34947–34961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06967-6

Baiduri, Putri, O. R. U., & Alfani, I. (2020). Mathematical connection process of students with high mathematics ability in solving PISA problems. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1527–1537. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.9.4.1527

Batanero, C., & Álvarez-Arroyo, R. (2024). Teaching and learning of probability. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 56(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01511-5

Batanero, C., Begué, N., Álvarez-Arroyo, R., & Valenzuela-Ruiz, S. M. (2021). Prospective mathematics teacher understanding of classical and frequentist probability. Mathematics, 9(19), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9192526

Burgos, M., Batanero, C., & Godino, J. D. (2022). Algebraization levels in the study of probability. Mathematics, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/math10010091

Chernoff, E. J. (2009). Sample space partitions: An investigative lens. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.03.002

Elbehary, S. G. A. (2022). Rethinking mathematics teacher’ professional knowledge for teaching probability from the perspective of probabilistic reasoning: A proposed framework. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(3), em0695. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12145

Fraenkel, R. J., Wallen, E. N., & Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to Design Research in Education and Evaluate. In S. K. Marketing (Ed.), ISBN-10: 0-07-809785-1 (EIGHTH EDI). McGraw-Hill, a business unit of The McGraw-Hill Companies.

García-García, J. I., Fernández Coronado, N. A., Arredondo, E. H., & Imilpán Rivera, I. A. (2022). The Binomial Distribution: Historical Origin and Evolution of Its Problem Situations. Mathematics, 10(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/math10152680

Geiger, V., Galbraith, P., Niss, M., & Delzoppo, C. (2022). Developing a task design and implementation framework for fostering mathematical modelling competencies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(2), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10039-y

Greer, B. (2001). Understanding probabilistic thinking: The legacy of Efraim Fischbein. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 45(1–3), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013801623755

Groth, R. E., Austin, J. W., Naumann, M., & Rickards, M. (2021). Toward a theoretical structure to characterize early probabilistic thinking. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33(2), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00287-w

Hall, J. (2012). Gender Issues in Mathematics: An Ontario Perspective. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v8i1.3004

Hokor, E. K. (2020). Pre-service Teacher’ Probabilistic Reasoning in Constructivist Classroom. Pedagogical Research, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7838

Hokor, E. K., Apawu, J., Owusu-Ansah, N. A., & Agormor, S. (2021). Preservice Teacher’ Misconceptions in Solving Probabilistic Problems. Pedagogical Research, 7(1), em0112. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/11441

Hokor et al. (2023). Novice Elementary Teacher’ Probabilistic and Statistical Reasoning: Addressing Misconceptions. Journal of Educational Studies in Science and Mathematics (JESSM), 2(1), 43–71. https://doi.org/10.29329/jessm.2023.618.3

Ingram, J. (2022). Randomness and probability: exploring student teacher’ conceptions. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 00(00), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2021.2016029

Jacinto, H., & Carreira, S. (2023). Knowledge for teaching mathematical problem-solving with technology: An exploratory study of a mathematics teacher’s proficiency. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12464

Jailani, Retnawati, H., Rafi, I., Mahmudi, A., Arliani, E., Zulnaidi, H., Hamid, H. S. A., & Prayitno, H. J. (2023). A phenomenological study of challenges that prospective mathematics teacher face in developing mathematical problems that require higher-order thinking skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(10). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13631

Jolliffe, F. (2005). Assessing Probabilistic Thinking and Reasoning. Exploring Probability in School, 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24530-8_14

Jones, G. A., Langrall, C. W., Thornton, C. A., & Mogill, A. T. (1999). Students’ probabilistic thinking in instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(5), 487–519. https://doi.org/10.2307/749771

Keshav, M., Julien, L., & Miezel, J. (2022). The Role Of Technology In Era 5.0 In The Development Of Arabic Language In The World Of Education. Journal International of Lingua and Technology, 1(2), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.55849/jiltech.v1i2.85

Kholid, M. N., & Aisyah, N. N. (2025). Classification of Abstract Thinking in Solving Mathematical Problems. Educational Process: International Journal, 16. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.16.194

Kusuma, A. P., Waluya, S. B., Rochmad, & Mariani, S. (2024). Algebraic thinking profile of pre-service teacher in solving mathematical problems in relation to their self-efficacy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(11), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/15580

Lau, L. Y., & Ranyard, R. (1999). Chinese and English speakers’ linguistic expression of probability and probabilistic thinking. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(4), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022199030004002

Li, D., Fan, X., & Meng, L. (2024). Development and validation of a higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) scale for major students in the interior design discipline for blended learning. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70908-3

Limbach Barbara, W. W. (2022). Developing High-Level Thinking. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies Developing, 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811252617_0009

Lo, S. C., & Tsai, H. H. (2022). Perceived Effectiveness of Developing a Mobile System of Formative Test with Handwriting Revision to Devise an Instruction Design Based on Cognitive Apprenticeship Theory. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042272

Lubis, S. Z., Mahdalena, M., & Zulmaulida, R. (2023). Design of Mathematics Learning Framework Based on the Perspective of the Qur’an. Infinity Journal, 11(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.24256/jpmipa.v11i2.2976

Martin, V., Thibault, M., & Homier, M. (2022). Convergence and Divergence in Probability Teaching in Elementary and Secondary School in Québec: a Closer Look at Eight Teacher’ Self-reported Practices. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(3), 659–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-022-00241-2

Maxine, P., & Constance, M. B. (1996). Building on and Challenging Students’ Intuitions About Probability: Can We Improve Undergraduate Learning? In Journal of Statistics Education (Vol. 4, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.1996.11910502

Menzler, K., Belke, M., Wehrmann, E., Krakow, K., Lengler, U., Jansen, A., Hamer, H. M., Oertel, W. H., Rosenow, F., & Knake, S. (2011). Men and women are different: Diffusion tensor imaging reveals sexual dimorphism in the microstructure of the thalamus, corpus callosum and cingulum. NeuroImage, 54(4), 2557–2562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.029

Miles, M.B, Huberman, A.M, & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis (A Methods Sorcebook) (3rd ed.). SAGE publications, Inc.

Mooney, E. S., Langrall, C. W., & Hertel, J. T. (2014). A Practitional Perspective on Probabilistic Thinking Models and Frameworks. 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7155-0_27

Moreno, A., & Cardeñoso, J. M. (2014). Overview of prospective mathematics teacher’ Probabilistic Thinking. Sustainability in Statistics Education. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS9, July, 2014), Flagstaff, Arizona, USA, July, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2660.0328

Muhaimin, L. H., Sholikhakh, R. A., Yulianti, S., Ardani, Hendriyanto, A., & Sahara, S. (2024). Unlocking the secrets of students’ mathematical literacy to solve mathematical problems: A systematic literature review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14404

Ozyildirim-Gumus, F., & Ozyildirim, G. (2020). Reflective Thinking and Probabilistic Thinking: An Example of Elementary School Students. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 13(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.13.1.5

Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method second edition. In The Mathematical Gazette (Vol. 30, p. 181).

Ratri, R., Kartono., D. & A. A. (2021). Problem-Solving Process of Students with a Reflective Cognitive Style Based on the Action-Process-Object-Schema Theory. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1199–1213. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.1.41

Rodríguez-Alveal, F., Díaz-Levicoy, D., & Aguerrea, M. (2022). Literacy and probabilistic thinking in pre-service and in service mathematics teacher. Uniciencia, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.36-1.22

Ruggiero V.R. (2012). Be a Critical Reader, Listener, and Viewer. The Art of Thinking: A Guide to Critical and Creative Thought, Tenth Edition, 67–92.

Santrcok, J. W. (2019). Seventeenth Edition. In Adolescene.

Sari, A. D., Suryadi, D., & Dasari, D. (2024). Learning obstacle of probability learning based on the probabilistic thinking level. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(1), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp207-226

Sari, D. I., Budayasa, I. K., & Juniati, D. (2017). Probabilistic thinking of elementary school students in solving probability tasks based on math ability. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1867(August). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4994431

Savard, A. (2014). Developing Probabilistic Thinking: What About People’s Conceptions? 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7155-0_15

Scheunemann, A., Schnettler, T., Bobe, J., Fries, S., & Grunschel, C. (2022). A longitudinal analysis of the reciprocal relationship between academic procrastination, study satisfaction, and dropout intentions in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 37(4), 1141–1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-021-00571-z

Shaughnessy, M., DeFino, R., Pfaff, E., & Blunk, M. (2021). I think I made a mistake: How do prospective teacher elicit the thinking of a student who has made a mistake? Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24(4), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-020-09461-5

Solso, R. L., Maclin, O. H., & Kimberly, M. M. (1995). Cognitive Psychology. Allyn and Bacon.

Supratman, Budayasa, I. K., & Rahaju, E. B. (2025). Probability problem-solving : the role of probabilistic thinking of undergraduate mathematics education students with feminine female gender and field- independent cognitive style. Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania, 2(April), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.32744/ pse.2025.1.15

Sutama, S., Anif, S., Prayitno, H. J., Narimo, S., Fuadi, D., Sari, D. P., & Adnan, M. (2021). Metacognition of Junior High School Students in Mathematics Problem-solving Based on Cognitive Style. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(1), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i1.12604

Taamneh, M. A., Díez-Palomar, J., & Mallart-Solaz, A. (2024). Examining tenth-grade students’ errors in applying Polya’s problem-solving approach to Pythagorean theorem. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15707

Taram, A., Sukestiyarno, Rochmad, & Junaedi, I. (2020). Probabilistic Thinking Ability of the Students of Mathematics Education Bachelor’s Degree in Terms of Their Cognitive Style. 443(Iset 2019), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200620.010

Tohir, M., Maswar, M., Moh, A., Saiful, S., & Rizki Pradita, D. A. (2024). Prospective teacher’ expectations of students’ mathematical thinking processes in solving problems. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1735–1748. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.9.4.1735

Twohill, A., NicMhuirí, S., Harbison, L., & Karakolidis, A. (2023). Primary Preservice Teacher’ Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Beliefs: the Role Played by Mathematics Attainment, Educational Level, Preparedness to Teach, and Gender. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(2), 601–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10259-5

Valsecchi, G., Iacoviello, V., Berent, J., Borinca, I., & Falomir-Pichastor, J. M. (2023). Men’s Gender Norms and Gender-Hierarchy-Legitimizing Ideologies: The Effect of Priming Traditional Masculinity Versus a Feminization of Men’s Norms. Gender Issues, 40(2–4), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-022-09308-8

Vecchione, F., Giancola, M., Palmiero, M., Boccia, M., D’Amico, S., & Piccardi, L. (2023). Field dependence-independence mediates the association between visual perception and mathematics. A cross-sectional study in children and preadolescents. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(5), 854–874. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2023.2224552

Wang, L. J., Wang, X., & Ren, M. Z. (2003). Field-dependent-independent cognitive style in solving dynamics problems. Psychological Reports, 92(3 I), 867–880. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2003.92.3.867

Wijaya, T. T., Yu, Q., Cao, Y., He, Y., & Leung, F. K. S. (2024). Latent Profile Analysis of AI Literacy and Trust in Mathematics Teacher and Their Relations with AI Dependency and 21st-Century Skills. Behavioral Sciences, 14(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14111008

Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications. In Review of Educational Research (Vol. 47, Issue 1, pp. 1–64). https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047001001

Xie, F., Yang, Y., & Xiao, C. (2023). Gender-math stereotypes and mathematical performance: the role of attitude toward mathematics and math self-concept. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38(2), 695–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00631-y

Zhang, K., Djonov, E., & Torr, J. (2016). Reading and Reinterpreting Picture Books on Children’s Television: Implications for Young Children’s Narrative Literacy. Children’s Literature in Education, 47(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-015-9259-x